The Fox, the Hedgehog, and the Millennials

President Obama’s student-debt proposal — and the reaction to it — reveal how Democrats and Republicans are courting young people.

US President Barack Obama speaks before signing a memorandum on reducing the burden of student loans on June 9, 2014 in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC. 
AFP/Getty Images
Ronald Brownstein
June 12, 2014, 5 p.m.

It was telling that when Pres­id­ent Obama un­veiled his latest pro­pos­al to re­strain stu­dent debt earli­er this week, Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans ini­tially fired back not with a cri­ti­cism of the plan it­self but with a re­lease that cata­logued an ar­ray of grim stat­ist­ics on young people’s ex­per­i­ences in the eco­nomy. The ex­change cap­tured the con­trast between the ap­proaches Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans are us­ing to court the massive mil­len­ni­al gen­er­a­tion, whose elect­or­al in­flu­ence is stead­ily ex­pand­ing.

Obama’s new ef­fort to cap stu­dent-loan debts il­lu­min­ated a Demo­crat­ic strategy of pur­su­ing the mil­len­ni­al gen­er­a­tion by of­fer­ing them pro­grams and policies that align with their views. The Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­an re­sponse shows a GOP that is court­ing mil­len­ni­als around a broad­er ar­gu­ment centered on the eco­nom­ic struggles many of them are fa­cing.

It’s the polit­ic­al equi­val­ent of philo­soph­er Isai­ah Ber­lin’s fam­ous dis­tinc­tion between the fox and the hedge­hog. Like the fox, Demo­crats say mil­len­ni­als agree with them on many things. Like the hedge­hog, Re­pub­lic­ans say Demo­crats are fail­ing mil­len­ni­als on the one big thing that mat­ters most: provid­ing them eco­nom­ic op­por­tun­ity.

So far, Demo­crats have got­ten the bet­ter of the ar­gu­ment. As the first mil­len­ni­als have moved in­to the elect­or­ate since 2000 (the gen­er­a­tion is best de­scribed as the 90 mil­lion-plus young people born from 1981 through 2002), Demo­crats have en­joyed a con­sist­ent ad­vant­age with young­er voters. In 2008, Obama won two-thirds of voters un­der 30. His ad­vant­age slipped in 2012, but he still car­ried three-fifths of them.

Look­ing for­ward, though, the gen­er­a­tion seems more con­flic­ted. Ana­lysts in both parties agree that mil­len­ni­als’ eco­nom­ic struggles have pre­ven­ted Demo­crats from so­lid­i­fy­ing their sup­port as much as ap­peared pos­sible after Obama’s first vic­tory.

The depth of their eco­nom­ic dis­con­tent rang through a re­cent poll con­duc­ted as part of a series of joint Na­tion­al Journ­al/At­lantic mil­len­ni­al town halls un­der­writ­ten by Mi­crosoft.

In the sur­vey, only a little more than one-third of mil­len­ni­als de­scribed cur­rent eco­nom­ic con­di­tions as either very good (8 per­cent) or even some­what good (27 per­cent). Few­er than one-fourth thought the eco­nomy was bet­ter than a year ago. Nor was there much op­tim­ism about the months ahead: In the poll, only 27 per­cent thought the eco­nomy would be bet­ter one year from now.

On all of these ques­tions, young whites without a col­lege de­gree were es­pe­cially pess­im­ist­ic. But the lar­ger story was the con­sist­ency of this eco­nom­ic dis­con­tent across the mil­len­ni­al gen­er­a­tion, even among groups that oth­er­wise have been the most sup­port­ive of Obama and Demo­crats. The share of non­white mil­len­ni­als who said the eco­nomy was good today or likely to im­prove over the next year was not mean­ing­fully lar­ger than the share of whites; wo­men were no more op­tim­ist­ic than men.

The March 14-18 sur­vey by the IC2 In­sti­tute at the Uni­versity of Texas (Aus­tin) was con­duc­ted on­line, so the res­ults may not be as stat­ist­ic­ally pre­cise as those from a ran­dom-di­git-dial tele­phone poll. But they’re con­sist­ent with oth­er polling — polling that paints a dis­tinctly gloomy pic­ture of mil­len­ni­als’ moods.

An­oth­er re­cent on­line poll of this group, this one con­duc­ted by Paul Harstad, a poll­ster for Obama in 2008, crys­tal­lized this dis­con­tent in­to a single an­swer when it asked re­spond­ents wheth­er they agreed that “my em­ploy­ment or edu­ca­tion op­por­tun­it­ies are a lot less than I thought they’d be.” Ex­actly three-fifths of mil­len­ni­als said yes.

All of that maps the op­por­tun­ity for the GOP’s hedge­hog ar­gu­ment that Obama and the Demo­crats have failed mil­len­ni­als on the one thing that mat­ters most. But the IC2, Harstad, and oth­er re­cent sur­veys all show the po­ten­tial power of the fox case from Demo­crats. Both the IC2 and Harstad sur­veys, for in­stance, in­dic­ate sig­ni­fic­ant mil­len­ni­al re­ceptiv­ity to Demo­crat­ic ar­gu­ments about in­equal­ity; fully two-thirds in the IC2 poll agreed that it is dif­fi­cult for av­er­age people to get ahead today.

Demo­crats also en­joy a con­sist­ent ad­vant­age with mil­len­ni­als on most cul­tur­al is­sues, as an ABC/Wash­ing­ton Post sur­vey last week re­minded. No Re­pub­lic­an 2016 con­tender is likely to fully sup­port gay mar­riage, but in the poll a head-turn­ing 77 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans un­der 30 said they backed it. And even as Re­pub­lic­ans erup­ted in op­pos­i­tion last week to Obama’s pro­pos­al to lim­it car­bon emis­sions from power plants, three-fourths of mil­len­ni­als in the same poll said they con­sidered cli­mate change a ser­i­ous prob­lem.

The most con­tested gen­er­a­tion­al ground may be the role of gov­ern­ment. Some sur­veys, like Harstad’s, show mil­len­ni­als more open than their eld­ers to gov­ern­ment act­iv­ism; but oth­er polls show them un­der­stand­ably un­con­vinced that any big in­sti­tu­tions — in­clud­ing gov­ern­ment and busi­ness — have worked very well for them. Kristen Solt­is An­der­son, a young GOP poll­ster who has ex­tens­ively stud­ied mil­len­ni­als, says the real duel un­der­way is between Demo­crats of­fer­ing pro­grams such as stu­dent-debt re­lief or a high­er min­im­um wage that ad­dress “the acute, im­me­di­ate pain” mil­len­ni­als face, and Re­pub­lic­ans try­ing in­stead to con­vince them “we’ve got to start over and re­think our ap­proach to these big sys­tems, wheth­er it’s high­er edu­ca­tion or health care.”

That de­bate isn’t settled, but An­der­son ac­know­ledges that Re­pub­lic­ans face a tough bur­den of proof “with a gen­er­a­tion that has nev­er really had a reas­on to trust [us]” after com­ing of age polit­ic­ally dur­ing George W. Bush’s con­ten­tious pres­id­ency. The Re­pub­lic­an hedge­hogs are dig­ging away, but must still bur­row past a thick tangle of ex­per­i­ences and at­ti­tudes be­fore reach­ing a mil­len­ni­al break­through.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×