You Don’t Need a Weatherman

What the seasonal and cyclical forces in American politics suggest about the coming elections.

Slow turning: What goes around comes around.
National Journal
Charlie Cook
March 13, 2014, 5 p.m.

The polit­ic­al chat­ter these days is about the spe­cial elec­tion in Flor­ida’s 13th Con­gres­sion­al Dis­trict, which was held to fill the va­cancy left by the late GOP Rep. Bill Young. The dis­trict is con­sidered to be in a very com­pet­it­ive area of the coun­try (in­deed, Pres­id­ent Obama won the 13th in 2012), and the seat was be­lieved to be held se­curely by Re­pub­lic­ans only by the strength of a long­time in­cum­bent. The GOP had long feared that, without Young, it would have a dif­fi­cult time hold­ing the dis­trict. Even go­ing in­to the cam­paign’s fi­nal days, most ob­serv­ers thought Demo­crat Alex Sink, who came with­in an eye­lash of be­ing elec­ted gov­ernor in 2010, would pre­vail over former Young aide Dav­id Jolly. This race was very im­port­ant to Demo­crats in their push to main­tain even the pos­sib­il­ity of cap­tur­ing the 17 seats needed for a House ma­jor­ity in 2014. To do so, they need to win com­pet­it­ive dis­tricts just like FL-13. While Sink was not con­sidered a fab­ulous can­did­ate, she was gen­er­ally cred­ited with be­ing a su­per­i­or can­did­ate to Jolly, who toted the bur­den­some “lob­by­ist” la­bel. Jolly’s win — he took 48.5 per­cent to Sink’s 46.7 — is a huge psy­cho­lo­gic­al blow to House Demo­crats and a sig­nal that Obama’s low poll num­bers and the Af­ford­able Care Act’s un­pop­ular­ity will very likely cost Demo­crats seats. Vir­tu­ally all of the most en­dangered Demo­crat­ic Sen­ate seats are in places a lot tough­er for the party to win than FL-13.

This state of af­fairs nat­ur­ally takes us in­to a con­ver­sa­tion about sea­sons and cycles.

It’s sur­pris­ing how many people who avidly fol­low Amer­ic­an polit­ics don’t seem to ap­pre­ci­ate that elec­tions are both sea­son­al and cyc­lic­al in nature.

The sea­son­al as­pect is the more ob­vi­ous one. Clearly in some years, or sea­sons, the wind is blow­ing in fa­vor of one party. In oth­er years, it ap­pears to blow in the op­pos­ite dir­ec­tion. In oth­ers still, as dur­ing the time between sea­sons, the par­tis­an winds do not seem to blow in any dir­ec­tion at all.

Un­for­tu­nately, the cyc­lic­al nature is lost on more people. In any giv­en even-numbered year, the House is on a cycle of its own, the Sen­ate an­oth­er, and the gov­ernor­ships yet an­oth­er. The easi­est to identi­fy is the House cycle; with its two-year terms, all you have to do is look at the pre­vi­ous elec­tion. If Demo­crats had a great year and picked up a large num­ber of Re­pub­lic­an seats, you know that Demo­crats are likely to be over­ex­posed and to suf­fer losses in the com­ing elec­tion cycle. If Re­pub­lic­ans had a ban­ner year in the pre­vi­ous elec­tion, they are more likely to lose than to gain seats. It’s all pretty straight­for­ward.

In the Sen­ate, with its six-year terms, it is ne­ces­sary to look back three elec­tions, to the last time that the cur­rent class was up for the voters’ con­sid­er­a­tion. If one side had a more suc­cess­ful elec­tion six years earli­er, that party likely will lose seats this time around. So, in 2014, we are look­ing at a group of seats last up in 2008. That was a year when Pres­id­ent Bush’s poll num­bers were de­pleted by the Ir­aq War and his hand­ling of Hur­ricane Kat­rina, and fur­ther de­pressed by the fin­an­cial crisis and the coun­try’s sub­sequent tumble in­to a deep re­ces­sion. The GOP suffered a net loss of eight seats that year. The Demo­crat­ic suc­cess back then ex­plains why the party has 21 seats up this year, in­clud­ing six in heav­ily Re­pub­lic­an states, com­pared with only 15 GOP seats, only one of which is in a Demo­crat­ic state.

Be­cause 2010 was a ter­rif­ic year for Re­pub­lic­ans, the GOP will have 24 seats up in 2016, sev­en of which are in states car­ried by Obama in 2012. Demo­crats will have only 10 seats up that year, none in a state Obama car­ried by few­er than 5 points.

These cycles are very im­port­ant but not en­tirely de­term­in­at­ive. For ex­ample, 2006 was a ter­rif­ic year for Demo­crats, so the 2012 elec­tion cycle — with 23 Demo­crat­ic and only 10 Re­pub­lic­an seats up — the­or­et­ic­ally should have been a good year for the GOP. However, 2012 was a prime ex­ample of the sea­son­al­ity of elec­tions. Obama got reelec­ted by nearly 4 per­cent­age points; his state-of-the-art cam­paign op­er­a­tion max­im­ized Demo­crat­ic turnout in a pres­id­en­tial year, which nor­mally fa­vors Demo­crats more than do midterm elec­tions, when the elect­or­ate tends to be older, whiter, and more Re­pub­lic­an. Plus, Mitt Rom­ney was no prize can­did­ate for the top of the tick­et. Mak­ing mat­ters worse, Re­pub­lic­ans nom­in­ated some rather exot­ic can­did­ates in In­di­ana and Mis­souri, seiz­ing de­feat from the jaws of vic­tory, and Re­pub­lic­ans else­where sus­tained col­lat­er­al dam­age. As a res­ult, an elec­tion that once looked like an op­por­tun­ity for Re­pub­lic­ans to gain three seats and a Sen­ate ma­jor­ity res­ul­ted in a net GOP loss of three seats, drop­ping the party’s Sen­ate roster to 45, six short of a ma­jor­ity.

Gov­ernors, most of whom serve four-year terms, are on yet a third cycle. The 2010 cycle was a hor­rif­ic one for Demo­crats, who lost six gov­ernor­ships. This year, Re­pub­lic­ans are gen­er­ally over­ex­posed in gubernat­ori­al races, de­fend­ing 22 seats to just 14 for Demo­crats. Nine of the Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernor­ships (al­most half) are in states Obama car­ried. Only one of the Demo­crat­ic seats, Arkan­sas, is in a state where Rom­ney pre­vailed in 2012.

Look­ing at this Novem­ber’s midterms, then, the wind cer­tainly ap­pears to be blow­ing in fa­vor of Re­pub­lic­ans. The main ques­tion is wheth­er it is a light, mod­er­ate, strong, or hur­ricane-force wind. In terms of cycles, on the oth­er hand, Demo­crats picked up just eight House seats in 2012, after hav­ing lost 63 seats in 2010 and hav­ing gained 52 seats in the sol­id Demo­crat­ic years of 2006 and 2008 com­bined. The House is pretty much sor­ted out, and min­im­al change can be ex­pec­ted. Re­pub­lic­ans look likely to pick up a hand­ful of seats.

But be­cause Re­pub­lic­ans won so many gov­ernor­ships — 23 — in 2010, they should be pre­pared to lose seats this year. The only ques­tion that re­mains is to what ex­tent the sea­son­al par­tis­an winds and the GOP’s midterm-elec­tion-turnout edge will off­set a scen­ario oth­er­wise fa­vor­able to Demo­crats. Right now, Cook Polit­ic­al Re­port Seni­or Ed­it­or Jen­nifer Duffy (who over­sees both gubernat­ori­al and sen­at­ori­al cov­er­age) pre­dicts Demo­crats will net two to four gov­ernor­ships.

Both sea­son­al and cyc­lic­al forces are work­ing against Sen­ate Demo­crats, sug­gest­ing a really bad year for the party in the up­per cham­ber. Duffy cur­rently sees Re­pub­lic­ans pick­ing up four to six Sen­ate seats. A big­ger gain of sev­en or more seats is more likely for Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans this elec­tion than a smal­ler gain of three or few­er.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4814) }}

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×