Can Democrats Recover From the Obamacare Catastrophe?

If Republicans don’t flub the coming fiscal debates like they did in the fall, voters will focus squarely on the health care rollout.

US President Barack Obama pauses while speaking during an event on the grounds of the White House December 3, 2013 in Washington, DC. Obama spoke about the Affordable Care Act and the continuing efforts to recover from the failed rollout of the healthcare marketplace.
National Journal
Charlie Cook
Dec. 5, 2013, 4 p.m.

Most graphs of polling data show shifts that are very gradu­al. (Track­ing real-time changes in poll res­ults of­ten is about as ex­cit­ing as watch­ing paint dry.) Re­cently, however, the Huff­Post Poll­ster web­site pro­duced a graph of na­tion­al polling on Con­gress that showed one of the most dra­mat­ic shifts I’ve ever seen in 40 years of in­volve­ment in polit­ics. It charts re­sponses to the ques­tion of wheth­er voters would like Re­pub­lic­ans or Demo­crats to con­trol the House.

The year began with Demo­crats 8 points ahead of Re­pub­lic­ans on the gen­er­ic con­gres­sion­al bal­lot test, 46 per­cent to 38 per­cent. The GOP had come out of the 2012 elec­tions lick­ing its wounds, hav­ing lost a pres­id­en­tial elec­tion that, just a year earli­er, ap­peared highly win­nable. As the year pro­gressed, the Demo­crat­ic ad­vant­age gradu­ally but con­sist­ently de­clined, par­al­lel­ing a sim­il­ar erosion of Pres­id­ent Obama’s job-ap­prov­al rat­ing since his reelec­tion. The drop in Demo­crats’ num­bers leveled off in June, to a stat­ist­ic­ally in­sig­ni­fic­ant 1 per­cent­age point lead over Re­pub­lic­ans. It is im­port­ant to re­mem­ber that there is a his­tor­ic tend­ency for this poll ques­tion to skew by a couple of points in fa­vor of Demo­crats, mak­ing that mea­ger edge al­most cer­tainly an il­lu­sion.

Then, in Au­gust, state­ments star­ted com­ing from some of the more exot­ic Re­pub­lic­ans in the House and Sen­ate that per­haps it was a good idea to shut down the gov­ern­ment over the im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Af­ford­able Care Act. Not­with­stand­ing warn­ings from House and Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers and ex­per­i­enced (and wiser) mem­bers that such an ef­fort would be a dis­aster for the party, the Re­pub­lic­ans in the “kami­kaze caucus” barreled ahead, over the cliff, shut­ting down the gov­ern­ment.

Sure enough, the Demo­crat­ic num­bers in the gen­er­ic bal­lot began to pull dra­mat­ic­ally ahead, re­sem­bling a steep as­cent up the side of a moun­tain, end­ing about 7 points ahead of Re­pub­lic­ans, 45 per­cent to 38 per­cent — an ad­vant­age that, were it to last un­til the elec­tion, would give Demo­crats a chance to re­cap­ture the House.

Then, in mid-Oc­to­ber, the fo­cus shif­ted from the gov­ern­ment-shut­down fiasco to a dif­fer­ent de­bacle, this time a Demo­crat­ic dis­aster: the botched launch of the Obama­care web­site and sub­sequent im­ple­ment­a­tion prob­lems of the health care law, in­clud­ing ter­min­a­tion no­tices go­ing out to many people who had in­sur­ance cov­er­age. The Demo­crat­ic num­bers from the gen­er­ic-bal­lot test dropped from 45 per­cent to 37 per­cent, and Re­pub­lic­ans moved up to 40 per­cent. This 10-point net shift from a Demo­crat­ic ad­vant­age of 7 points to a GOP edge of 3 points in just over a month is breath­tak­ing, per­haps an un­pre­ced­en­ted swing in such a short peri­od. Oc­cur­ring around Elec­tion Day, such a shift would prob­ably amount to the dif­fer­ence between Demo­crats pick­ing up at least 10 House seats, pos­sibly even the 17 needed for a ma­jor­ity, and in­stead los­ing a half-dozen or so seats.

Of course, with the elec­tion 11 months away, it’s too early to get really ex­cited about this turn­about, but it demon­strates the volat­il­ity we are see­ing these days in Amer­ic­an polit­ics. It must also give Demo­crats a sense of déjà vu, back to when the bot­tom fell out for them dur­ing the 2009-10 fight over pas­sage of the Af­ford­able Care Act. In that case, though, they suffered a gradu­al de­cline in party for­tunes, start­ing in the sum­mer of 2009 and cul­min­at­ing in the loss of 63 seats and the House ma­jor­ity in Novem­ber 2010 — the biggest drop in House seats for either party since 1948 and the largest in a midterm elec­tion since 1938. Demo­crats didn’t fare much bet­ter in the Sen­ate, los­ing six seats.

No one knows for sure how the next few phases of ACA im­ple­ment­a­tion will go. Demo­crats’ hopes that their for­tunes will im­prove as a res­ult of up­com­ing fisc­al de­bates are start­ing to look pretty shaky, however. Demo­crats may be count­ing on Re­pub­lic­ans to en­gage in more self-de­struct­ive be­ha­vi­or when gov­ern­ment fund­ing ex­pires in mid-Janu­ary and the debt ceil­ing ex­pires in Feb­ru­ary.

But it looks in­creas­ingly likely that Re­pub­lic­ans will go along with a deal, avert­ing a spend­ing/debt-ceil­ing crisis, and not re­peat the dis­aster of this fall. Avoid­ing such a fight would keep most of the pub­lic’s fo­cus on Obama­care, and, in Re­pub­lic­ans’ eyes, give them the gift that will keep on giv­ing. At this point, that doesn’t ap­pear to be an un­real­ist­ic ex­pect­a­tion.

But what will hap­pen next? A jaded ob­serv­er might sug­gest that cer­tain Sen­ate Demo­crats may try to move the goal­posts of a budget deal, push­ing for ad­di­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an con­ces­sions to the point that House Speak­er John Boehner can’t de­liv­er enough of the hard-liners in his caucus, thus cre­at­ing a re­peat of last fall’s show­down. Of course, that is a highly cyn­ic­al view, but it does not seem im­plaus­ible that Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id might try such a strategy. The catch is wheth­er Demo­crats could po­ten­tially sab­ot­age a budget deal without leav­ing any in­crim­in­at­ing fin­ger­prints. The cyn­ics might be wrong but, then again, Re­id has six Sen­ate seats up next year in states that Mitt Rom­ney car­ried by double-di­git mar­gins. We’ll see.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×