Why Elizabeth Warren Isn’t the Most Liberal Senator

She broke with her party over a key element of Obamacare, and opposed the estate tax. Plus, she has many very liberal colleagues.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) speaks during a briefing on a Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rule October 30, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Peter Bell
Feb. 6, 2014, 7:13 a.m.

Ten years ago, Na­tion­al Journ­als vote rat­ings showed John Kerry to be the Sen­ate’s most lib­er­al mem­ber. Some called the rat­ing un­fair, but con­ser­vat­ives were glee­ful that someone else had so labeled the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­ee for pres­id­ent. Pres­id­ent Bush even men­tioned Kerry’s rat­ing dur­ing their second 2004 pres­id­en­tial de­bate, de­scrib­ing it as “the award he won from the Na­tion­al Journ­al.”

This year, the vote rat­ings of an­oth­er Mas­sachu­setts Demo­crat are eye-catch­ing, but for the op­pos­ite reas­on. Eliza­beth War­ren, the new­est lib­er­al icon, is not the most lib­er­al mem­ber of the Sen­ate, ac­cord­ing to this year’s Na­tion­al Journ­al vote rat­ings. War­ren’s com­pos­ite lib­er­al score of 73.2 places her as the 31st-most-lib­er­al sen­at­or. How could that be?

For starters, she broke with Pres­id­ent Obama on a very sig­ni­fic­ant piece of le­gis­la­tion, vot­ing to re­peal Obama­care’s med­ic­al-device tax — a core ele­ment to the fund­ing of the Af­ford­able Care Act. Many man­u­fac­tur­ers are based in Mas­sachu­setts, so this is an in­stance of her vot­ing her con­stitu­ency over her party. She didn’t stop there, join­ing with many Re­pub­lic­ans to “re­peal or re­duce the es­tate tax” if done in a fisc­ally re­spons­ible way. War­ren even irked con­sumer ad­voc­ates by op­pos­ing a meas­ure that would have al­lowed states to man­date la­beling of foods that con­tain ge­net­ic­ally mod­i­fied in­gredi­ents. Those dif­fer­ences gave her a lib­er­al per­cent­ile score of 75 on eco­nom­ic policy.

An­oth­er reas­on that War­ren didn’t stand out is that many of her less­er-known col­leagues are also very lib­er­al — part of the very po­lar­iz­a­tion that we write about in this week’s Na­tion­al Journ­al cov­er story. By tak­ing one small vote against her lead­er­ship, her rank­ing drops con­sid­er­ably be­cause so many Sen­ate Demo­crats have held a lib­er­al line.

On for­eign policy, War­ren re­ceived a lib­er­al per­cent­ile score of 54. In that area, War­ren took the con­ser­vat­ive po­s­i­tion on just one vote, vot­ing with al­most every Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­an against an amend­ment to lim­it the leg­al rights of Guantanamo de­tain­ees brought to the United States (vote num­ber 238). How could War­ren get such a mod­er­ate score when she voted with Re­pub­lic­ans just once? An­swer: When Sen­at­ors vote in lock­step, small dif­fer­ences in vot­ing re­cords can have a large im­pact on per­cent­ile scores. And with nearly 30 sen­at­ors rack­ing up per­fect lib­er­al vot­ing re­cords on for­eign policy, the highest lib­er­al per­cent­ile score any of them re­ceived was a 71.

On so­cial is­sues, War­ren lived up to her repu­ta­tion, ty­ing with 26 oth­er Demo­crat­ic sen­at­ors as the most lib­er­al. War­ren and well-known lib­er­als such as Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Tammy Bald­win, D-Wis., all re­ceived a score of 73 — the most lib­er­al score any sen­at­or got in that cat­egory.

Josh Kraush­aar con­trib­uted

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×