Why an ‘Anti-Incumbent’ Election Might Be Impossible

Fewer people than ever think their member of Congress deserves reelection — but more still want them back in 2015 than not.

The early morning sun begins to rise behind the U.S. Capitol on December 17, 2010 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Scott Bland
See more stories about...
Scott Bland
Jan. 24, 2014, 8:17 a.m.

Amer­ic­ans really dis­ap­prove of Con­gress. By sev­er­al dif­fer­ent met­rics, they dis­ap­prove more than ever. But new data from Gal­lup show that more people still want to keep their own mem­ber of Con­gress in of­fice, demon­strat­ing just how dif­fi­cult it might be to have a true cross-party, anti-in­cum­bent wave elec­tion.

Ap­prov­al of Con­gress is down to 13 per­cent in Janu­ary, near its low­est point ever. And al­though a re­cord-low 17 per­cent of voters say “most mem­bers of Con­gress de­serve reeelec­tion,” 46 per­cent still be­lieve their own mem­ber of Con­gress de­serves an­oth­er term in Wash­ing­ton.

That is the low­est level Gal­lup has found in 22 years of ask­ing that ques­tion. But “re­cord low” does not mean “dis­astrous.” If this is what a bad en­vir­on­ment looks like, law­makers have it aw­fully good.

It is still 8 points clear of the 38 per­cent of voters who say their mem­ber doesn’t de­serve an­oth­er two years.

Mean­while, the “reelect your mem­ber” num­ber syncs with the ups and downs of people’s will­ing­ness to reelect most num­bers — but at 17 per­cent, that fig­ure can’t go much lower. (Neither can con­gres­sion­al ap­prov­al, an­oth­er meas­ure that moves up and down at a sim­il­ar pace.) Un­less that re­la­tion­ship frays, 46 per­cent of people want­ing to reelect their mem­ber may be as low as Amer­ica goes. Plus, meas­ur­ing gen­er­ic sup­port like this typ­ic­ally un­der­states how well in­cum­bents do when matched against chal­lengers who in­ev­it­ably have some flaws.

As Gal­lup notes, “Res­ults like these have pres­aged sig­ni­fic­ant turnover in Con­gress, such as in 1994, 2006, and 2010,” and we could well be in for an­oth­er year like those. But those years were more anti-ma­jor­ity than anti-in­cum­bent: In all three of those midterm elec­tions, voters re­belled against the party con­trolling Con­gress and flipped scores of House seats in the oth­er dir­ec­tion. This year, Con­gress is di­vided, and House dis­tricts are sor­ted to the point where there isn’t too much room for the parties to take new dis­tricts. And even in those tu­mul­tu­ous years, or at the height of the wide­spread House bank­ing scan­dal in 1992, reelec­tion rates nev­er dipped be­low 85 per­cent, ac­cord­ing to the Cen­ter for Re­spons­ive Polit­ics.

And on top of that, des­pite a very rough year for con­gres­sion­al rat­ings, more people than not still want their mem­ber back in 2015.

It’s al­most im­possible for polls to show more un­hap­pi­ness with Con­gress, but nearly half of Amer­ic­ans want to re­hire their rep­res­ent­at­ive later this year. It’s one key reas­on why an anti-in­cum­bent elec­tion hit­ting both parties is so un­likely.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×