Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Are Your Menstrual Products Poisoning You? Are Your Menstrual Products Poisoning You?

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation


Health Care

Are Your Menstrual Products Poisoning You?

Legislation introduced this week would increase research and regulation of potentially harmful ingredients in feminine-hygiene products.

(Chris Hondros/Getty Images)

There may be even more reason for women to dread that time of the month.

Feminine-hygiene products like tampons and pads have been found to contain certain ingredients that could be harmful to women's health, but consumers are left largely in the dark about potential risks of the products they are using.

Many menstrual-hygiene products contain dioxin, synthetic fibers, chlorine, and fragrances, but the amount of these ingredients—and the health risk they pose when used in these products—remains a bit of a question mark.


A report from Women's Voices for the Earth—a nonprofit that seeks to eliminate toxic chemicals—links these ingredients to health problems like endocrine disruption, cancer, and reproductive harm. The extent of the risks associated with feminine-hygiene products are woefully under-researched, women's health advocates say, but the fact that they are used on an extremely absorbent and permeable area of the body raises the level of concern.

Rep. Carolyn Maloney introduced legislation Wednesday that aims to clarify these unknowns. The Robin Danielson Act—named after a victim of Toxic Shock Syndrome from tampon use—would require the National Institutes of Health to conduct or support research into these ingredients, encourage the Food and Drug Administration to look more heavily into the risks of a variety of menstrual products, increase oversight of company data submitted to NIH and FDA, and require public disclosure of the information.

The degree to which these products are monitored by the FDA depends on their classification and level of risk, according to an industry spokesperson. Tampons and pads are classified as medical devices and subject to more regulation—particularly tampons because of the threat of Toxic Shock Syndrome. Other feminine-hygiene products like douche solutions and deodorizers are classified as over-the-counter drugs or as cosmetics, depending on the claims being made, and they are subject to less regulation. These are not generally reviewed by the FDA prior to marketing.

The FDA does routinely monitor dioxin levels in tampons, and the agency says concerns are largely unfounded. While the agency has found trace dioxin levels in these products, the risk of negative health impacts is "negligible," it says.

Manufacturers also maintain that their products are secure. "The safety of women is the foundation of everything we do," Mandy Ciccarella, a representative for Procter and Gamble—which owns Tampax and Always brands—wrote in an email. "We share our feminine care product information with independent experts—including medical consultants, university scientists, and the FDA—so that women can use our feminine-hygiene products with confidence."

But advocates worry that even these small amounts of chemicals could have a cumulative adverse effect, with thousands used over a lifetime on an extremely permeable part of the body.

This is not the first time Rep. Maloney has introduced this kind of legislation; she's been trying to pass it for more than a decade. The New York Democrat first introduced tampon-safety legislation in 1997, introduced the first version of the Robin Danielson Act in 1999, and pushed subsequent versions of the bill again in 2003, 2005, 2008, and 2011. The 2014 bill is different in that it focuses more on the regulation of other types of feminine-hygiene products besides tampons, said Rep. Maloney's office.

The biggest hurdle has been the unwillingness of lawmakers to broach what could be considered an uncomfortable subject, according to her office.

"This is not exactly something congresspeople want go to the floor and talk about," a spokesperson said.

This article appears in the May 29, 2014 edition of NJ Daily.

LIKE THIS STORY? Sign up for Health Care Edge

Get your daily dose of National Journal's health care coverage.

Sign up form for Health Care Edge
Job Board
Search Jobs
Biomedical Service Internship Position
American Society of Civil Engineers | Flint, MI
Fire Sprinkler Inspector
American Society of Civil Engineers | Charlotte, NC
Professional Development Program Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Farmington Hills, MI
Deputy Director of Transit Operations
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Jose, CA
Transportation Planner
American Society of Civil Engineers | Salinas, CA
Assistant Professor - Water Resources/Ecological Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Auburn, AL
Product Manager - Chemical Development and Supply - Tulsa, OK
American Society of Civil Engineers | Tulsa, OK
Commissioning Intern
American Society of Civil Engineers | Chicago, IL
Assessment and Remediation Team Lead
American Society of Civil Engineers | Regina, SK
Business Development Manager
American Society of Civil Engineers
Sr. Controls Systems Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Grand Island, NE
Senior Project Manager- Transportation
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Antonio, TX
Materials Engineer 2
American Society of Civil Engineers | IL
Land Surveyor
American Society of Civil Engineers
Quality Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Attica, IN
comments powered by Disqus