Obamacare Website Has Cost $840 Million

A slew of management failures led to the site’s disastrous launch, according to a new GAO report.

Mercy Cabrera, an insurance agent with Sunshine Life and Health Advisors, speaks on the phone as she helps a person with information about an insurance policy under the Affordable Care Act at the store setup in the Westland Mall on November 14, 2013 in Hialeah, Florida.
National Journal
Sam Baker
July 30, 2014, 5 p.m.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has spent roughly $840 mil­lion on Health­Care.gov, in­clud­ing more than $150 mil­lion just in cost over­runs for the ver­sion that failed so badly when it launched last year.

The Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice says cost over­runs went hand-in-hand with the man­age­ment fail­ures that led to the dis­astrous launch of Health­Care.gov and the 36 state in­sur­ance ex­changes it serves.

GAO’s re­port, pre­pared for a House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee hear­ing Thursday, de­tails a long series of man­age­ment, over­sight, and con­tract­ing prob­lems that plagued the en­tire pro­cess, from risky con­tract­ing prac­tices in 2011 through the botched launch last Oc­to­ber.

A massive re­pair ef­fort got the site sta­bil­ized by Janu­ary, and des­pite the early fail­ures, the ad­min­is­tra­tion ended up ex­ceed­ing its en­roll­ment tar­get for this year. More than 8 mil­lion people chose plans through Obama­care, in­clud­ing the 36 states whose mar­ket­places run through Health­Care.gov.

All the same, GAO says, sim­il­ar prob­lems could arise again without struc­tur­al changes in the way the gov­ern­ment man­ages its con­tracts and spend­ing.

Here are the key find­ings from GAO’s pre­pared testi­mony:

  • The Cen­ters for Medi­care and Medi­caid Ser­vices, the agency re­spons­ible for build­ing the fed­er­ally run in­sur­ance mar­ket­places, “is­sued task or­ders “¦ when key tech­nic­al re­quire­ments were still un­known.”
  • When the pro­cess began in 2011, CMS ob­lig­ated $56 mil­lion for the fed­er­ally run ex­changes, in­clud­ing Health­Care.gov. Those costs swelled to $209 mil­lion.
  • Costs for the fed­er­al data hub, which co­ordin­ates re­cords and per­son­al in­form­a­tion from sev­er­al state and fed­er­al agen­cies to help the ex­changes pro­cess ap­plic­a­tions, rose from $30 mil­lion to $80 mil­lion.
  • “New and chan­ging re­quire­ments drove cost in­creases dur­ing the first year of de­vel­op­ment, while the com­plex­ity of the sys­tem and re­work res­ult­ing from chan­ging CMS de­cisions ad­ded to “¦ costs in the second year,” GAO states.
  • CMS has paid $12.5 mil­lion to CGI Fed­er­al, the primary con­tract­or for the site. CMS of­fi­cials had prob­lems with CGI’s work throughout the pro­cess, but the agency only with­held about 2 per­cent of its pay­ments to the com­pany.
  • CMS fired CGI in Janu­ary and signed a new con­tract with Ac­cen­ture. That con­tract has also seen ma­jor cost over­runs””from an ini­tial ob­lig­a­tion of $95 mil­lion to more than $175 mil­lion.
  • Be­cause CMS’s over­sight of the con­tract with CGI was so poor, CMS of­fi­cials in­ap­pro­pri­ately au­thor­ized more than $30 mil­lion in ex­pendit­ures. GAO found 40 sep­ar­ate oc­ca­sions on which work was ap­proved in­cor­rectly.
  • “CMS launched Health­Care.gov without veri­fic­a­tion that it met per­form­ance re­quire­ments,” GAO said, be­cause the agency pushed back re­views of the site’s per­form­ance to just weeks be­fore the Oct. 1 launch.

Rep. Fred Up­ton, the chair­man of the En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee, noted that key pieces of the Health­Care.gov sys­tem””in­clud­ing the part that pays in­sur­ance com­pan­ies””still haven’t been built.

“The dis­astrous im­ple­ment­a­tion of the pres­id­ent’s health care law has already led to can­celed plans, lost ac­cess to doc­tors, and high­er premi­ums,” Up­ton said in a state­ment. “Now add to that hun­dreds of mil­lions of tax­pay­er dol­lars wasted on an ex­change that is still not ready for prime time.”

CMS spokes­man Aaron Al­bright said the agency has already taken con­crete steps to im­prove its man­age­ment of Health­Care.gov.

“CMS takes its re­spons­ib­il­ity for con­tract­ing over­sight ser­i­ously and has already im­ple­men­ted con­tract­ing re­forms that are more ex­tens­ive than the re­com­mend­a­tions in the re­port, in­clud­ing end­ing our con­tract with CGI and mov­ing to a new type of con­tract with Ac­cen­ture that re­wards per­form­ance,” he said.

CMS brought in an­oth­er con­tract­or, QSSI, to co­ordin­ate the Health­Care.gov re­pair ef­fort and has now dir­ectly hired Andy Slavitt, who spear­headed the pro­ject for QSSI. Sylvia Math­ews Bur­well, the new Health and Hu­man Ser­vices sec­ret­ary, has also cre­ated new po­s­i­tions with dir­ect re­spons­ib­il­ity for Health­Care.gov and the fed­er­ally run ex­changes.

The agency is also in the pro­cess of form­al­iz­ing in­tern­al guidelines that aim to pre­vent un­au­thor­ized work or­ders like the ones GAO dis­covered.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×