A Court Ruling Just Blew a Huge Hole in Obamacare

Opposite court rulings leave the future of Obamacare subsidies in 36 states unknown.

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 30: U.S. President Barack Obama delivers remarks about the faltering immigration reform agenda to the news media with in the Rose Garden at the White House June 30, 2014 in Washington, DC. Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) said today that the House of Representatives would not take up immigration reform legislation this year and Obama said he would continue to use his executive power to bolster enforcement on the southern border. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
National Journal
Sophie Novack Sam Baker
July 22, 2014, 6:25 a.m.

Obama­care was just dealt a ma­jor loss in court.

The U.S. Court of Ap­peals for the D.C. Cir­cuit ruled Tues­day that more than half the coun­try shouldn’t be re­ceiv­ing tax sub­sidies un­der Obama­care””a rul­ing that could cripple the health care law if it’s ul­ti­mately up­held.

The 2-1 de­cision in Hal­big v. Se­beli­us is the first vic­tory, in any court, for a leg­al chal­lenge that says the tax sub­sidies should be avail­able only in states that set up their own in­sur­ance ex­changes.

Just a few hours later, a three-judge pan­el of the 4th Cir­cuit Court of Ap­peals ruled the op­pos­ite way in King v. Bur­well, re­ject­ing a sim­il­ar law­suit that aimed to block the very same in­sur­ance sub­sidies.

The health care law spe­cific­ally au­thor­izes sub­sidies in “an ex­change es­tab­lished by the state,” and the plaintiffs in both cases said the ad­min­is­tra­tion vi­ol­ated the law by also ex­tend­ing sub­sidies to the 36 states us­ing the fed­er­al sys­tem. They said Con­gress meant for the tax cred­its to serve as an in­cent­ive for states to es­tab­lish their own ex­changes.

De­fend­ers of the health care law said that read­ing of the Af­ford­able Care Act is too nar­row, and that Con­gress clearly in­ten­ded for the fin­an­cial as­sist­ance to be provided equally on all ex­changes.

The 4th Cir­cuit pan­el agreed, say­ing the stat­ute it­self was un­clear. It al­lowed the IRS to con­tin­ue provid­ing fin­an­cial as­sist­ance in all 50 states, say­ing the agency’s in­ter­pret­a­tion of the law was en­titled to de­fer­ence in the courts.

The D.C. Cir­cuit, mean­while, ruled against the ad­min­is­tra­tion.

Two fed­er­al courts have pre­vi­ously dis­missed sim­il­ar chal­lenges, mak­ing Tues­day’s Hal­big vic­tory es­pe­cially im­port­ant for the chal­lengers.

The D.C. Cir­cuit rul­ing guar­an­tees that the is­sue will move for­ward””something that should ser­i­ously scare the ad­min­is­tra­tion. An ul­ti­mate win would deal a dev­ast­at­ing blow to the health care law.

A re­cent re­port from Urb­an In­sti­tute re­search­ers es­tim­ated that a rul­ing against the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion could cause 7.3 mil­lion people””about 62 per­cent of the 11.8 mil­lion people ex­pec­ted to en­roll in fed­er­ally fa­cil­it­ated mar­ket­places by 2016””to lose out on $36.1 bil­lion in in­sur­ance sub­sidies.

Con­sumers in Texas and Flor­ida could be hard­est hit, ac­cord­ing to the re­port, with $5.6 bil­lion and $4.8 bil­lion re­spect­ively at risk.

The fed­er­al gov­ern­ment plans to ap­peal the three-judge pan­el’s rul­ing to the full D.C. Cir­cuit, where Obama­care al­lies be­lieve they’re more likely to win. The split rul­ings have opened the pos­sib­il­ity that the is­sue could make it to the Su­preme Court next year, but this will re­main un­cer­tain at least un­til after the Hal­big de­cision is ap­pealed. 

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5113) }}

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×