One Thing Congress Can Agree on: Shielding Seniors From Medicare Fraud


An auxiliary nurse assists a patient in a geriatric unit at the hospital in Angers, western France, on October 23, 2013. The Angers hospital employs 6,000 people including 980 doctors.
National Journal
Clara Ritger
See more stories about...
Clara Ritger
May 1, 2014, 6:21 a.m.

There is one solu­tion to fight­ing Medi­care fraud that most law­makers can agree on: Re­move seni­ors’ So­cial Se­cur­ity num­bers from their Medi­care cards to stop iden­tity theft.

But they can’t agree with fed­er­al agen­cies on how to pay for it.

The House Ways and Means Com­mit­tee held a meet­ing Wed­nes­day to dis­cuss the best way to pro­tect seni­ors from theft and ab­use. Two dif­fer­ent solu­tions have been pro­posed: an out­right re­quire­ment that the Cen­ters for Medi­care and Medi­caid Ser­vices take the num­bers off of the cards, and an al­tern­at­ive to the cur­rent cards — a “smart card,” if you will — that con­tains the data se­curely.

Yet neither has been en­acted. Why?

Money. To change the cur­rent sys­tem, which ser­vices roughly 50 mil­lion seni­ors, CMS would need a hefty sum. There’s the over­head of pro­du­cing new cards and, if the smart cards were ad­op­ted, edu­cat­ing seni­ors and phys­i­cians about how to use their new pieces of plastic.

“While [CMS] agrees that re­mov­ing the So­cial Se­cur­ity num­bers from the Medi­care card is an ap­pro­pri­ate step to re­du­cing the risk of iden­tity theft, CMS can­not make a de­cision to pro­ceed uni­lat­er­ally,” a CMS of­fi­cial said in an email. “CMS, the So­cial Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion, and the Rail­road Re­tire­ment Board must all agree to pro­ceed with the ini­ti­at­ive, and to con­sider all ex­ist­ing work­loads and pri­or­it­ies in light of the fund­ing that is avail­able for such a ma­jor pro­ject.”

The Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice is re­view­ing the smart-card pro­pos­al — re­tir­ing Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Jim Ger­lach’s Medi­care Com­mon Ac­cess Card Act — and is ex­pec­ted to com­plete its ana­lys­is of the ad­min­is­trat­ive and cost bur­den to en­act the pro­gram by the end of the year.

It’s not clear the GAO re­port will re­solve the dis­agree­ment over fund­ing for re­mov­ing So­cial Se­cur­ity num­bers from cards, though. Ac­cord­ing to an aide for Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Sam John­son, who is co­spon­sor­ing the bi­par­tis­an bill to re­move So­cial Se­cur­ity num­bers from the cur­rent cards, CMS wants an ap­pro­pri­ation but Con­gress thinks the agency can carry out the change in a fisc­ally re­spons­ible fash­ion us­ing its own re­sources.

“CMS has been work­ing with the com­mit­tee to find a mu­tu­ally ac­cept­able solu­tion,” a spokes­man said in an email.

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.