What Comes Next for Obamacare

The law survived attempts to kill it in the crib, but it’s about to enter a turbulent childhood.

National Journal
Sam Baker
March 31, 2014, 1 a.m.

Obama­care’s first en­roll­ment peri­od is end­ing — and with it, a half-dec­ade of de­bat­ing the law solely as a vague polit­ic­al ab­strac­tion.

How the Af­ford­able Care Act would play out has been mostly a the­or­et­ic­al ques­tion un­til now; Re­pub­lic­ans pre­dicted it would col­lapse in on it­self (didn’t hap­pen), while Demo­crats swore the pub­lic would em­brace it as time went on (also didn’t hap­pen).

The end of the first open-en­roll­ment peri­od provides real-world data to meas­ure the law’s pro­gress — and those res­ults will help define the chal­lenges the law faces as it grows out of its in­fancy.

We won’t know for a few more weeks ex­actly how many people picked a plan dur­ing the six-month en­roll­ment win­dow, but it’s some­where north of 6 mil­lion. And we won’t know un­til much later — if ever — how many people paid their first premi­um, or how many en­rollees were pre­vi­ously un­in­sured.

Both of those are crit­ic­al met­rics for eval­u­at­ing the law’s per­form­ance. Neither an­swer, however, is likely to move the law back to the oth­er side of the key threshold it has already crossed: sign­ing up enough people to push ahead in­to 2015 and 2016.

“The ACA has sur­vived an elec­tion and a Su­preme Court chal­lenge and a gov­ern­ment shut­down and a web­site de­bacle, and now doubts about its en­roll­ment totals,” said Drew Alt­man, pres­id­ent of the Kais­er Fam­ily Found­a­tion.

With mil­lions of people sign­ing up, the law has cleared one long, dif­fi­cult set of hurdles and has de­fied the darkest pre­dic­tions of its crit­ics. But that doesn’t mean it’s out of the woods en­tirely — it’s just on to the next long, dif­fi­cult set of hurdles.

What will hap­pen to premi­ums?

It’s too flip to say the na­tion­al en­roll­ment data “doesn’t mat­ter” — the whole point of the law was to cov­er mil­lions of un­in­sured Amer­ic­ans, and wheth­er that’s hap­pen­ing mat­ters very much. But the na­tion­al total doesn’t say much about of the law’s sus­tain­ab­il­ity or what hap­pens to premi­ums next year.

Premi­ums will go up, be­cause premi­ums go up every year. The size of next year’s premi­um in­creases de­pends on en­roll­ment and demo­graph­ics in each state, and even with­in spe­cif­ic re­gions of each state.

Some states are faring bet­ter than oth­ers: Cali­for­nia is well-po­si­tioned for 2015, with en­roll­ment above ex­pect­a­tions and a com­pet­it­ive mar­ket. On the oth­er end of the spec­trum are states like Mis­sis­sippi, where there’s only one in­sur­ance com­pany in the state’s ex­change and the pop­u­la­tion is re­l­at­ively un­healthy to be­gin with.

The demo­graph­ic mix is pretty steady across all 50 states. Na­tion­ally, young adults — the most coveted en­rollees — made up 25 per­cent of all sign-ups through the end of Feb­ru­ary. The per­cent­age will prob­ably im­prove in the fi­nal ana­lys­is; young people were al­ways ex­pec­ted to sign up at the last minute.

Gen­er­ally, if the risk pool in a par­tic­u­lar mar­ket turns out older and sick­er than ex­pec­ted, in­surers are more likely to raise their premi­ums. We don’t know pre­cisely what in­surers ex­pec­ted — they all priced their plans in­de­pend­ently, and the law in­cludes sev­er­al pro­grams de­signed to ab­sorb any sur­prises and keep premi­ums as steady as pos­sible. In com­pet­it­ive mar­kets, in­surers likely will try to keep in­creases to a min­im­um, but in­dustry in­siders cau­tion that hikes are look­ing likely, at least in some parts of the coun­try.

Will people like their plans?

So, en­roll­ment in the first is de­cent, and there are tools to try to keep premi­ums in check, which will help en­roll­ment con­tin­ue to grow. The ad­min­is­tra­tion will prob­ably do pretty well at get­ting people in­to the sys­tem. The biggest chal­lenge for the Af­ford­able Care Act, health care ex­perts say, is wheth­er people like what they find.

“The biggest ques­tion by far is how people feel about that cov­er­age, and wheth­er they think it’s a good deal “¦ and what is the pro­por­tion of win­ners to losers,” Alt­man said.

The “losers” — people who had their plans can­celed and must pay more for an equi­val­ent policy that might not in­clude their doc­tor — have got­ten more at­ten­tion so far. The “win­ners” — people with preex­ist­ing con­di­tions who were denied or priced out of health in­sur­ance un­til now — will likely get more at­ten­tion as more of them ac­tu­ally gain cov­er­age.

But what if even the “win­ners” start to sour on their cov­er­age?

If the people who were sup­posed to be­ne­fit the most from Obama­care find them­selves stuck in their de­duct­ibles, pay­ing out of pock­et even though they have in­sur­ance, they could “start to be very pub­licly un­happy,” said Car­oline Pear­son, seni­or vice pres­id­ent at the con­sult­ing firm Avalere Health.

The risk, Pear­son said, is that “you’ve got the chron­ic­ally ill people who … came in with the prom­ise of good cov­er­age and they don’t find their cov­er­age to be mean­ing­ful.”

The Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment is already “wor­ry­ing about that and try­ing to fig­ure out, ‘How do we give people some good­ies?’ ” she said.

There’s also a risk of con­sumer back­lash against nar­row net­works of doc­tors and oth­er pro­viders. Many ex­change plans have ex­cluded ex­pens­ive pro­viders as a way to keep premi­ums low. That’s a big­ger is­sue for people who had cov­er­age be­fore than people who are gain­ing it for the first time, but HHS is also on guard on that front, hint­ing that it might re­quire broad­er net­works.

Even if people like their be­ne­fits, will they like ‘Obama­care’?

Re­pub­lic­ans are con­fid­ent the is­sue will buoy them in Novem­ber, and Demo­crat­ic strategists ac­know­ledge that health care isn’t likely to turn in their fa­vor between now and then. The best they can do is neut­ral­ize it.

The turn­around in en­roll­ment from Oc­to­ber to March is un­deni­able, and it’s a big win for the White House. But even as the law has found its foot­ing and en­roll­ment has surged, pub­lic ap­prov­al hasn’t budged.

In the Kais­er Fam­ily Found­a­tion’s latest track­ing poll, pub­lic opin­ion of the Af­ford­able Care Act was deeply di­vided, as al­ways. Forty-six per­cent of voters said they have an un­fa­vor­able view of the law, com­pared with 38 per­cent who rate it fa­vor­ably — ba­sic­ally the same break­down the poll found in Septem­ber, be­fore the dis­astrous Health­Care.gov launch.

“We could ask, Will the ACA cure Amer­ica’s en­ergy prob­lems or take us to Mars, and we will get an al­most per­fect par­tis­an split in the re­sponses,” Alt­man said.

If the pub­lic is go­ing to re­think Obama­care, it’s go­ing to take a while.

“I think over time, as the law be­comes more real for the Amer­ic­an people, a judg­ment based on the real­ity of the law will be­gin to sup­plant the role the law has played as a sym­bol­ic di­vid­ing line between Left and Right,” Alt­man said.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4850) }}

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×