Arkansas Just Funded Its Medicaid Expansion — but the Fight Isn’t Over

The state Legislature narrowly renewed the “private option” plan, but the program’s future remains uncertain.

National Journal
Sophie Novack
See more stories about...
Sophie Novack
March 4, 2014, 11:21 a.m.

Arkan­sas’s ver­sion of Medi­caid ex­pan­sion un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act is weakened, but safe … for now.

After sev­er­al weeks of un­cer­tainty, the Arkan­sas House and Sen­ate each ap­proved fund­ing for the state’s “private op­tion,” which takes fed­er­al dol­lars for Medi­caid ex­pan­sion and uses them to buy private in­sur­ance plans for low-in­come in­di­vidu­als on the ex­change.

The Sen­ate ap­proved the le­gis­la­tion first on a 27-8 vote Feb. 20. After four failed votes, the House passed the bill Tues­day on a 76-24 vote.

However, the ac­tion re­news the pro­gram for only a year, and op­pon­ents re­main com­mit­ted to con­tinu­ing the fight.

The re­place­ment of a Demo­crat­ic sen­at­or by a Re­pub­lic­an who op­posed the private op­tion in a spe­cial elec­tion earli­er this year, plus one or two oth­er mem­bers switch­ing their vote, brought the fu­ture of the pro­gram — which has to be reau­thor­ized an­nu­ally — in­to ques­tion.

The bill had been held up in the House for the past few weeks, a few votes shy of the su­per­ma­jor­ity re­quired to pass spend­ing bills in the Arkan­sas Le­gis­lature. The state re­quires three-quar­ters ap­prov­al for pas­sage, or 75 out of 100 votes in the House and 27 out of 35 in the Sen­ate.

To achieve the ne­ces­sary vote count, the ori­gin­al com­prom­ise plan was amended this time around to ap­pease op­pon­ents, and these changes tar­get the fu­ture of the plan, as well as the over­all health care law in the state.

One of the main amend­ments, writ­ten by Re­pub­lic­an state Rep. Nate Bell, pro­hib­its any state funds from go­ing to­ward pro­mo­tion or out­reach of the ACA in the state. This in­cludes en­roll­ment in the private op­tion, as well as the over­all ex­change. Bell — an un­abashed crit­ic of the private op­tion and the health care law — has said he ul­ti­mately wants the pro­gram to fail, and that this amend­ment is in­ten­ded to sty­mie en­roll­ment.

“I be­lieve it’s im­port­ant as a con­ser­vat­ive that we re­cog­nize the situ­ation we’re in,” he said on the House floor dur­ing an earli­er vote last month. “When we can de­feat bad policy, we should do so. When we can’t de­feat bad policy, it’s our re­spons­ib­il­ity to do everything we can to in­flu­ence it and make it as closely aligned with our philo­sophy and policy as we can.”

Fund­ing for the private op­tion is in­cluded in the lar­ger ap­pro­pri­ations bill for the state’s De­part­ment of Hu­man Ser­vices, which means that either way, a su­per­ma­jor­ity had to agree to pass the bill — with or without the private op­tion — by the end of the le­gis­lat­ive ses­sion.

The amend­ments were in­ten­ded to make fund­ing the private op­tion more pal­at­able to mem­bers who op­pose fur­ther spend­ing on a pro­gram they see as im­pli­citly linked to Obama­care, and avoid what Bell called the “im­passe” in the budget stan­doff.

Bell and oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans who sup­por­ted the bill but op­pose the private op­tion have already vowed to con­tin­ue the fight against the pro­gram next year.

Giv­en the ex­per­i­ment­al nature of the private op­tion in Arkan­sas, it will con­tin­ue to be eval­u­ated reg­u­larly. The amend­ments passed Tues­day are in­ten­ded to weak­en the fu­ture of the pro­gram while main­tain­ing it for cur­rent en­rollees, un­til op­pon­ents gain more lever­age against it.

“For those who feel like I’ve be­trayed you, we’ll be back next year,” Re­pub­lic­an state Rep. Kim Ham­mer said ahead of the fi­nal vote. “If the pro­gram doesn’t work, I’ll vote against it.” Ham­mer was one of three no votes to flip Tues­day, along with fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans Les Car­nine and Mary Lou Slink­ard.

For now, the bill will be sent to Demo­crat­ic Gov. Mike Beebe, who plans to sign it. The le­gis­la­tion’s pas­sage en­sures that the ap­prox­im­ately 100,000 Arkansans who have already en­rolled in the private op­tion will keep their in­sur­ance cov­er­age an­oth­er year. If the Le­gis­lature failed to re­new fund­ing for the pro­gram, these in­di­vidu­als would have been kicked off their plans after June 30.

We can ex­pect a po­ten­tially even big­ger fight next year, when the private op­tion will need to be re­newed once again.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×