Why Hillary Clinton Was Not a Fan of the Individual Mandate

As she pushed her health reform plan in 1993, the former first lady warned Democrats the mandate would send “shock waves” through insured America.

National Journal
Alex Seitz-Wald
Feb. 28, 2014, 9:43 a.m.

In the fall of 1993, as then-first lady Hil­lary Clin­ton was push­ing her health care re­form pack­age, she warned Demo­crat­ic law­makers that the in­di­vidu­al man­date was a polit­ic­al loser, ac­cord­ing to new doc­u­ments re­leased Fri­day.

The doc­u­ments, made pub­lic for the first time by her hus­band’s pres­id­en­tial lib­rary and the Na­tion­al Archives and Re­cords Ad­min­is­tra­tion, shed light on how Clin­ton ap­proached the dif­fi­cult task of over­haul­ing the na­tion’s health care sys­tem, and where she differed from the ap­proach Pres­id­ent Obama would take on the same is­sue years later.

Hil­lary Clin­ton spear­headed the White House’s 1993 re­form ef­fort, which ul­ti­mately failed, and went to Cap­it­ol Hill in early Septem­ber that year to brief Demo­crat­ic House and Sen­ate lead­ers and com­mit­tee chairs and to try to con­vince them to sup­port her plan. The White House pro­pos­al re­lied more heav­ily on an em­ploy­er man­date to pay for health in­sur­ance, while the Re­pub­lic­an al­tern­at­ive at the time pro­posed a man­date on in­di­vidu­als to pur­chase cov­er­age.

“We have looked at that in every way we know how to,” Clin­ton told the law­makers of the in­di­vidu­al man­date. “That is polit­ic­ally and sub­stant­ively a much harder sell than the one we’ve got — a much harder sell.”

“Not only will you be say­ing that the in­di­vidu­al bears the full re­spons­ib­il­ity; you will be send­ing shock waves through the cur­rently in­sured pop­u­la­tion that if there is no re­quire­ment that em­ploy­ers con­tin­ue to in­sure, then they, too, may bear the in­di­vidu­al re­spons­ib­il­ity,” Clin­ton ad­ded.

It’s an ar­ti­fact of how much of a polit­ic­al ping-pong ball the in­di­vidu­al man­date has be­come over the in­ter­ven­ing two dec­ades, boun­cing back and forth between and in­side the two parties. The man­date star­ted at the con­ser­vat­ive Her­it­age Found­a­tion as an al­tern­at­ive to Clin­ton’s plan.

But in 2008, when she was run­ning for pres­id­ent, Clin­ton had come to sup­port the man­date — draw­ing the ire from her then-primary chal­lenger Barack Obama, who warned Clin­ton would “force un­in­sured people to buy in­sur­ance, even if they can’t af­ford it.” He too, of course, switched po­s­i­tions on the man­date, mak­ing it a key part of his sig­na­ture health care law once he came in­to of­fice. His law also in­cludes an em­ploy­er man­date like Clin­ton’s 1993 plan.

Her lengthy ex­change with the Demo­crat­ic lead­ers, in­clud­ing dif­fi­cult ques­tions and com­plaints about law­makers be­ing kept in the dark, sug­gest Clin­ton had a deep com­mand of the both policy and polit­ics of health care re­form, and clear-eyed view of the chal­lenges she faced. That in­cludes many of the same chal­lenges Obama faced and cur­rently faces with his own health plan. 

“I think that there will be, very hon­estly, a peri­od of ad­just­ment, a peri­od of set­ting, be­fore any of you will feel com­fort­able with all the fea­tures of this, be­cause we are really ap­proach­ing the health care sys­tem in a dif­fer­ent way,” she told the law­makers.

For in­stance, she counseled Demo­crats to fo­cus not on ex­pand­ing cov­er­age when speak­ing with con­stitu­ents — though that was the cent­ral goal of the plan — since the mes­sage doesn’t sell as well. “It may be an un­pleas­ant fact for some of us Demo­crats to face, but the ar­gu­ment is not go­ing to be won on bring­ing in the un­in­sured. The ar­gu­ment is go­ing to be won on keep­ing [cov­er­age] for every­body, in­clud­ing those who are in­sured, but may not be next year or the year after,” she said.

It’s ad­vice that rings as true in 2014 as it was in 1993. Of course, Clin­ton wasn’t suc­cess­ful then and Obama has yet to con­vince the coun­try today. 

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×