Here’s What it Looks Like When a Tobacco Company Says ‘I’m Sorry’

Get ready for a full-page New York Times ad-apology from tobacco companies.

National Journal
Clara Ritger
See more stories about...
Clara Ritger
Jan. 13, 2014, 8:11 a.m.

After 15 years of fight­ing the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment over lies to the pub­lic about the health risks of smoking, the na­tion’s biggest to­bacco com­pan­ies are ready to apo­lo­gize.

Philip Mor­ris USA, R.J. Reyn­olds, Lor­il­lard, and Al­tria are pre­par­ing full-page ads to run in the Sunday edi­tions of the coun­try’s top 35 news­pa­pers, as well as on­line ads for those pa­pers’ web­sites and prime-time tele­vi­sion spots to run for a full year on CBS, ABC, and NBC. The cor­por­a­tions are also re­quired to run cor­rect­ive state­ments on their web­sites and ci­gar­ette pack­ages.

The self-fla­gel­la­tion stems from a 2006 fed­er­al court de­cision or­der­ing the to­bacco com­pan­ies to cor­rect the re­cord on state­ments they made about the health ef­fects of smoking. On Fri­day, the com­pan­ies’ law­yers and the Justice De­part­ment struck a deal on how they will is­sue the apo­logy.

A mock-up of an ad­vert­ise­ment that could pub­lish as a full-page ad in The New York Times reads, “A Fed­er­al Court has ruled that Philip Mor­ris USA, R.J. Reyn­olds To­bacco, Lor­il­lard, and Al­tria de­lib­er­ately de­ceived the Amer­ic­an pub­lic about design­ing ci­gar­ettes to en­hance the de­liv­ery of nicot­ine and has ordered those com­pan­ies to make this state­ment.”

It goes on to say that the in­dustry “in­ten­tion­ally de­signed ci­gar­ettes to make them more ad­dict­ive,” and that nicot­ine “changes the brain,” mak­ing it harder to quit.

The to­bacco com­pan­ies could ap­peal the lan­guage of the ads. But first, U.S. Dis­trict Judge Gladys Kessler is sched­uled to re­view the agree­ment about how to is­sue the cor­rect­ive state­ments on Wed­nes­day, Jan. 22, at 10 a.m. in Courtroom 26A of the U.S. Dis­trict Court of D.C.

The Justice De­part­ment first brought the case against the to­bacco in­dustry in 1999, ar­guing that they know­ingly and in­ten­tion­ally mis­in­formed the pub­lic about the neg­at­ive health con­sequences of smoking.

Kessler ordered the in­dustry in 2006 to is­sue the state­ments after she found them guilty of vi­ol­at­ing civil rack­et­eer­ing laws and ly­ing to the pub­lic about the dangers of smoking.

The judge re­quired the state­ments to ap­pear on tele­vi­sion and in news­pa­pers, as well as on the com­pan­ies’ web­sites and ci­gar­ette pack­ages, and to con­tain lan­guage that the court had ruled that the com­pan­ies “de­lib­er­ately de­ceived the Amer­ic­an pub­lic.”

In find­ing the in­dustry guilty, Kessler wrote, “[This case] is about an in­dustry, and in par­tic­u­lar these De­fend­ants, that sur­vives, and profits, from selling a highly ad­dict­ive product which causes dis­eases that lead to a stag­ger­ing num­ber of deaths per year, an im­meas­ur­able amount of hu­man suf­fer­ing and eco­nom­ic loss, and a pro­found bur­den on our na­tion­al health care sys­tem. De­fend­ants have known many of these facts for at least 50 years or more. Des­pite that know­ledge, they have con­sist­ently, re­peatedly and with enorm­ous skill and soph­ist­ic­a­tion, denied these facts to the pub­lic, the Gov­ern­ment, and to the pub­lic health com­munity.”

Philip Mor­ris de­clined to of­fer a com­ment for the story.

The state­ments would cor­rect mis­in­form­a­tion about “the health ef­fects of smoking, the ad­dict­ive­ness of smoking and nicot­ine, the false ad­vert­ising of low-tar and light ci­gar­ettes as less harm­ful than reg­u­lar ci­gar­ettes, the design­ing of ci­gar­ettes to en­hance the de­liv­ery of nicot­ine and the health ef­fects of second­hand smoke,” ac­cord­ing to a press re­lease from the Amer­ic­an Can­cer So­ci­ety Ac­tion Net­work, one of the pub­lic in­ter­ven­ors that joined the case in 2005. The oth­er na­tion­al med­ic­al and ad­vocacy or­gan­iz­a­tions that joined the case are the Amer­ic­an Heart As­so­ci­ation, the Amer­ic­an Lung As­so­ci­ation, Amer­ic­ans for Nonsmokers’ Rights, the Na­tion­al Afric­an Amer­ic­an To­bacco Pre­ven­tion Net­work and the To­bacco-Free Kids Ac­tion Fund.

AC­SCAN’s as­so­ci­ate dir­ect­or of fed­er­al re­la­tions, Gregg Haif­ley, called the case “a long leg­al battle” that has been “dragged out” by the in­dustry.

“Mil­lions of people who oth­er­wise might have quit con­tin­ued smoking be­cause of blatant mis­rep­res­ent­a­tions of the harm to their health,” Haif­ley said. “The to­bacco in­dustry is an in­dustry that nev­er gives up. But we’re one step closer to a fi­nal con­clu­sion.”

The agree­ment falls on the 50th an­niversary of the sur­geon gen­er­al’s first re­port de­tail­ing the pub­lic-health con­sequences of smoking. The land­mark study promp­ted an­t­i­s­moking groups to pur­sue more-strin­gent pub­lic policy meas­ures reg­u­lat­ing the use of to­bacco, which res­ul­ted in 8 mil­lion lives saved since 1964, ac­cord­ing to a study pub­lished last week in the Journ­al of the Amer­ic­an Med­ic­al As­so­ci­ation.

Roughly 44 mil­lion adults and 3.6 mil­lion chil­dren in the United States smoke, ac­cord­ing to num­bers from the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Pre­ven­tion. Smoking costs the U.S. roughly $193 bil­lion an­nu­ally in health care ex­pendit­ures and lost pro­ductiv­ity, the CDC re­ports. Each year, an es­tim­ated 443,000 people die pre­ma­turely from a smoking-re­lated dis­ease.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×