Get Ready for the Obamacare Ad Blitz

Everyone involved with the law is planning to flood the airwaves this year.

Tourists watch on a Jumbotron in Times Square in New York as US President Barack Obama takes the oath of office during the 57th Presidential Inauguration ceremonial swearing-in at the US Capitol on January 21, 2013 in Washington, DC
National Journal
Sam Baker
Jan. 3, 2014, 4 a.m.

If you think you’ve heard an aw­ful lot about Obama­care over the past three years, you ain’t seen noth­ing yet.

This year will see a massive surge in TV ad­vert­ising about the law — first from its sup­port­ers, and then from its crit­ics.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion and its al­lies are set to spend tens of mil­lions of dol­lars on ad­vert­ising as well as in-per­son out­reach, most of it tar­get­ing roughly 10 states where es­pe­cially large num­bers of people are un­in­sured. 

For the most part, these cam­paigns will en­cour­age people to en­roll, rather than try­ing to sell the law polit­ic­ally. Al­though Obama­care still polls poorly, sup­port­ers firmly be­lieve the an­swer is to show that it’s work­ing — and that means get­ting people in the door.

The Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment has re­portedly re­served at least $12 mil­lion worth of TV ad time for spots pro­mot­ing the health care law and en­cour­aging people to en­roll. Out­side groups will spend even more.

HHS didn’t use much of its TV time in 2013, in part be­cause it had al­ways planned to fo­cus most of its re­sources to­ward the end of the en­roll­ment win­dow, and also be­cause it didn’t want to dir­ect people to an en­roll­ment site that wasn’t work­ing. But now that Health­Care.gov is largely fixed, ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fii­cials say they’re ready to “ramp up” the en­roll­ment cam­paign over the first quarter of this year.

En­roll Amer­ica, an um­brella group with close ties to the White House that was formed solely to pro­mote en­roll­ment, has raised more than $27 mil­lion for ad­vert­ising and grass­roots out­reach over the next three months. In ad­di­tion, lib­er­al ad­vocacy groups such as Or­gan­iz­ing for Ac­tion and Amer­ic­ans United for Change are already gath­er­ing pos­it­ive an­ec­dotes from people who have gained cov­er­age, part of a co­ordin­ated push to pro­mote the law through March. 

The ad­min­is­tra­tion will also have some help from the in­sur­ance in­dustry. In­di­vidu­al in­surers have already star­ted ad­vert­ising the spe­cif­ic products they’re selling through the law’s new mar­ket­places, and large plans have also con­trib­uted to En­roll Amer­ica.

An ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial said the in­surers’ ad­vert­ising drive is not only a re­flec­tion of the fact that they want new cus­tom­ers, but also a sign that the in­dustry be­lieves early prob­lems with the en­roll­ment pro­cess have been worked out. “They have a sense of con­fid­ence now that’s be­ing re­flec­ted in ad­vert­ising,” the of­fi­cial said dur­ing a re­cent brief­ing for re­port­ers.

The White House and its al­lies will fo­cus most of their money on a hand­ful of mar­kets, tar­get­ing places with large num­bers of un­in­sured res­id­ents as well as un­co­oper­at­ive state gov­ern­ments.

Cali­for­ni­ans, for ex­ample, won’t see much En­roll Amer­ica ad­vert­ising, be­cause the state is spend­ing its own money to pro­mote its ex­change. But states like Texas and Flor­ida, with hard-line Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernors who have res­isted all things Obama­care, will see a de­luge of out­side in­flu­ence.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion and its al­lies have mil­lions of dol­lars to spend and not all that much time to spend it. Their ad cam­paigns will run through the end of March, the dead­line to pur­chase cov­er­age for this year. The biggest push will come close to the fi­nal dead­line, when the ad­min­is­tra­tion ex­pects a surge in en­roll­ment.

The 2014 cam­paign sea­son — and its ad­vert­ising — will be heat­ing up just a few months later. Re­pub­lic­ans and con­ser­vat­ives are con­fid­ent that the botched rol­lout of Health­Care.gov and the up­roar over can­celed in­sur­ance policies will make a po­tent at­tack against vul­ner­able Sen­ate Demo­crats.

Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity, the con­ser­vat­ive ad­vocacy group tied to the wealthy Koch broth­ers, launched a mul­ti­mil­lion-dol­lar round of anti-Obama­care ads just this week. The spots tar­get three po­ten­tially vul­ner­able Demo­crat­ic in­cum­bents — Sens. Kay Hagan of North Car­o­lina, Mary Landrieu of Louisi­ana, and Jeanne Shaheen of New Hamp­shire.

AFP alone spent some $16 mil­lion on anti-Obama­care ads in 2012, and there are no signs that con­ser­vat­ives and of­fi­cial Re­pub­lic­an com­mit­tees will fo­cus on health care any less this year as they fight for con­trol of the Sen­ate. Landrieu, Hagan, Shae­heen and Sens. Mark Pry­or, D-Ark. and Mark Be­gich, D-Alaska, are fa­cing voters this year for the first time since vot­ing for the health care law.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4628) }}

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×