Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Inspector: Syria Did 'Poor' Job of Blaming Chemical Strike on Rebels Inspector: Syria Did 'Poor' Job of Blaming Chemical Strike on Rebels

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation


Inspector: Syria Did 'Poor' Job of Blaming Chemical Strike on Rebels

A key U.N. arms inspector said Syria's regime made "poor" links between opponents and an August chemical strike that he investigated, CBRNE World reports.

Swedish arms expert Ake Sellstrom led an international team that confirmed the involvement of sarin nerve gas in the Aug. 21 incident, but was not authorized to assign blame for the assault against a rebel-occupied Damascus suburb. The United States has charged that Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime was responsible for the attack, but that view has faced challenges from Russia and some independent experts.


Sellstrom, though, said Assad officials "have quite poor theories" for how its enemies might have carried out the strike.

"They talk about smuggling through Turkey, labs in Iraq and I asked them, pointedly, what about your own stores, have your own stores been stripped of anything, have you dropped a bomb that has been claimed, bombs that can be recovered by the opposition? They denied that," he said in remarks published on Thursday.

He added: "To me it is strange. If they really want to blame the opposition they should have a good story as to how they got hold of the munitions, and they didn't take the chance to deliver that story."

This article was published in Global Security Newswire, which is produced independently by National Journal Group under contract with the Nuclear Threat Initiative. NTI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan group working to reduce global threats from nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.

comments powered by Disqus