Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Boston Debates Banning Deadliest Pathogens From New Biolab Boston Debates Banning Deadliest Pathogens From New Biolab

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation


Boston Debates Banning Deadliest Pathogens From New Biolab


U.S. military biological laboratory personnel undergo decontamination during a 2007 exercise in California. Boston is set to convene a hearing this week on whether to ban the study of highly sensitive disease agents at a recently completed Boston University laboratory.(U.S. Air Force photo)

Boston is set this week to debate whether to ban a new, downtown biodefense laboratory from studying some of the world's deadliest disease agents.

A Wednesday city council hearing is expected to consider a proposed citywide prohibition on so-called "Biosafety Level 4" research, which can involve diseases for which there are no known cures. The initiative marks the latest local pushback against Boston University's effort to pursue the sensitive pathogen studies at its recently completed National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories.


In his draft ordinance, Councilor Charles Yancey said conducting such research at the site could enable an agent such as Ebola or Marburg to escape into the city, either by accident or deliberate action.

"I am not convinced we really need to invite that possibility to the city of Boston," Yancey told the Boston Globe in remarks published in a Sunday editorial.

Boston University has criticized the rationale behind the council measure, arguing that the laboratory's security is stringent and any sensitive research justified by the need to prepare against lethal disease agents.


A four-year risk study "considered hundreds of possible scenarios that could potentially result in an exposure of a worker to a pathogen, or the release of a biological agent [and] demonstrated conclusively that BSL-4 laboratories -- built with multiple backup redundancies for its operations systems -- are extremely safe," the university said in a statement last month.

Sunday's Globe editorial sides with the school, and argues that the site's location would facilitate collaboration with experts throughout the region.

"It's understandable why critics of the biolab might prefer that the research take place in an isolated facility ... [but that] would impede scientists' ability to learn from one another," the newspaper said.

This article was published in Global Security Newswire, which is produced independently by National Journal Group under contract with the Nuclear Threat Initiative. NTI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan group working to reduce global threats from nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.

comments powered by Disqus