Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Auditors Defend Pentagon for Skipping Bids on B-2 Upgrades Auditors Defend Pentagon for Skipping Bids on B-2 Upgrades

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation


Auditors Defend Pentagon for Skipping Bids on B-2 Upgrades


A U.S. B-2 strategic bomber taxis down a runway in 2005 at Andersen Air Force Base in Guam. The Government Accountability office backed a Pentagon decision not to pursue a competitive process for planned updates to B-2 bombers.(U.S. Air Force/Getty Images)

Congressional investigators said the Defense Department was right to skip a competitive process for planned updates to B-2 strategic bombers.

Technologies to update the nuclear-capable aircraft were already far along in their development, and Pentagon data reveals little room to save money by soliciting more proposals from companies, universities or agencies, according to a Government Accountability Office analysis issued on Tuesday.


The planned upgrades focus on the airplane's "defensive management system," designed to track enemy radar and alert crew members to possible threats, according to the GAO assessment.

The Defense Department informed legislative auditors in December of its intention not to pursue "competitive prototyping" for certain upgrades planned for the B-2 system, the report indicates. A 2009 law requires legislative auditors to scrutinize any Defense Department decision to skip the process, which can sometimes reduce expenses and the likelihood of technical problems, the document indicates.

The findings note that prime contractor Northrop Grumman accepted bids from other firms as it hired subcontractors for the B-2 project.


Developers would make use of "existing, technically mature subsystems" for two of the upgrade project's three main components, and Northrop Grumman used a competitive prototyping process to develop new antennas for the airplane, authors of the GAO study said.

The Air Force reviewed four "prototyping options" and determined they "would increase the program's development costs by between $28.2 million and $524.8 million [in base year 2011 dollars] depending on the type and number of prototypes," the report states.

This article was published in Global Security Newswire, which is produced independently by National Journal Group under contract with the Nuclear Threat Initiative. NTI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan group working to reduce global threats from nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.

comments powered by Disqus