Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

White House to Keystone Advocates: Not So Fast White House to Keystone Advocates: Not So Fast

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member or subscriber? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

White House to Keystone Advocates: Not So Fast

The administration's response to a key State Department finding on the pipeline left Obama plenty of room to keep the project on ice.

+

President Obama is keeping his options open on the Keystone pipeline.(MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)

Keystone XL pipeline advocates were quick to say that Friday's State Department report gives President Obama all the evidence he needs to approve the project.

They'll be disappointed after hearing from the White House. On Friday night the White House left itself plenty of breathing room on making the final decision.

 

"The President has clearly stated that the project will be in the national interest only if it does not significantly exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution. The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement includes a range of estimates of the project's climate impacts, and that information will now need to be closely evaluated by Secretary [of State John] Kerry and other relevant agency heads in the weeks ahead," said Matt Lehrich, a White House spokesman.

"A decision on whether the project is in the national interest will be made only after careful consideration of the SEIS and other pertinent information, comments from the public, and views of other agency heads," Lehrich added.

The key finding in the long-awaited State Department study is that Keystone would likely have little effect on the rate of expansion of carbon-intensive oil sands projects.

 

That major finding is a boost for TransCanada's proposed pipeline and a blow to environmentalists, who say building Keystone XL would drive up emissions by serving as a catalyst for expanded oil sands production.

But the report—available here—also examines alternative oil price and pipeline-constraint scenarios that dampen oil sands production, giving project opponents something to hang their hat on.

Don't Miss Today's Top Stories

Exactly what I need as a busy college student."

Samantha, Student

Sign up form for the newsletter
Comments
comments powered by Disqus
 
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL
 
 
 
 
Make your Election Night headquarters.
See more ▲
 
Hide