Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Canadian Envoy: Railways Aren’t the Answer, Keystone XL Is Canadian Envoy: Railways Aren’t the Answer, Keystone XL Is

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation


Canadian Envoy: Railways Aren’t the Answer, Keystone XL Is


Canada's ambassador said the Keystone XL pipeline would be better for the environment than moving oil from Alberta by rail.(Photo by Tom Pennington/Getty Images)

Canada's ambassador to the United States says the growing use of rail cars to transport Canadian crude oil underscores the need for White House approval of the Keystone XL pipeline.

"The facts basically speak for themselves," Gary Doer told Bloomberg in an interview. Pipelines are safer, cheaper, and emit less carbon dioxide pollution than moving crude oil by rail, he told the news service.


His comments to Bloomberg are part of the big PR and lobbying battle over TransCanada's proposed pipeline, which would bring hundreds of thousands of barrels per day from Alberta's oil sands to Gulf Coast refineries.

Environmentalists battling the pipeline say the project would worsen climate change by fueling expansion of carbon-intensive oil sands development.

They also allege that the consulting firm the State Department contracted to craft a pivotal environmental analysis of the proposal is too close to the oil industry.


Politico explores those ties here.

comments powered by Disqus