EPA: We’re Wounding Coal, Not Killing It

The agency predicts new emissions rules will shutter some coal plants, but the fossil fuel will remain a big part of the nation’s energy mix.

The smoke stacks at American Electric Power's (AEP) Mountaineer coal power plant in New Haven, West Virginia, October 30, 2009. In cooperation with AEP, the French company Alstom unveiled the world's largest carbon capture facility at a coal plant, so called 'clean coal,' which will store around 100,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide a year 2.1 kilometers (7,200 feet) underground. 
National Journal
Ben Geman
June 2, 2014, 7:22 a.m.

The En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency’s pro­posed car­bon-emis­sions rules for power plants would close a num­ber of coal plants na­tion­wide, but it would hardly wipe out the fuel source en­tirely, the agency says.

EPA fore­casts that in 2030 — the year by which the rules would re­quire the full car­bon cuts to be achieved — 30 per­cent of the na­tion’s elec­tric power will come from coal. That’s down from 39 per­cent in 2013, ac­cord­ing to fed­er­al En­ergy In­form­a­tion Ad­min­is­tra­tion fig­ures.

The pro­posed rules, re­leased Monday, seek to cut power-plant car­bon emis­sions by 30 per­cent from their 2005 levels by 2030.

Coal’s mar­ket share has already de­clined in re­cent years due to com­pet­it­ive nat­ur­al-gas prices, sep­ar­ate EPA rules to cut oth­er pol­lut­ants, the growth of re­new­able-en­ergy sources, and oth­er factors.

Here’s a key para­graph from the agency’s reg­u­lat­ory ana­lys­is re­leased Monday along­side the rule: “Re­l­at­ive to the base case, about 30 to 49 GW of coal-fired ca­pa­city is pro­jec­ted to be un­eco­nom­ic to main­tain (about 12 per­cent to 19 per­cent of all coal-fired ca­pa­city pro­jec­ted to be in ser­vice in the base case) by 2020 un­der the range of scen­ari­os ana­lyzed.”

And here’s a key fore­cast in the rule it­self: “EPA pro­jects coal pro­duc­tion for use by the power sec­tor, a large com­pon­ent of total coal pro­duc­tion, will de­cline by roughly 25 to 27 per­cent in 2020 from base case levels. The use of coal by the power sec­tor will de­crease roughly 30 to 32 per­cent in 2030.”

(Wonky side note: EPA’s “base case” doesn’t in­clude a ma­jor Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion rule to cut soot- and smog-form­ing power-plant pol­lu­tion that blows across state lines. The Su­preme Court up­held that rule in late April, but too late for EPA’s mod­el­ing, so they’re mod­el­ing a less-ag­gress­ive, Bush-era ver­sion of that rule.)

Re­pub­lic­ans and some in­dustry groups have cast Obama’s cli­mate agenda as a “war on coal.” EPA’s reg­u­la­tion seeks to re­but those claims, say­ing es­sen­tially that plenty of oth­er factors are cre­at­ing head­winds for the fuel.

“The way that power is pro­duced, dis­trib­uted, and used is already chan­ging due to ad­vance­ments in in­nov­at­ive power-sec­tor tech­no­lo­gies and in the avail­ab­il­ity and cost of low car­bon fuel, re­new­able en­ergy, and en­ergy ef­fi­cient de­mand-side tech­no­lo­gies, as well as eco­nom­ic con­di­tions,” the rule states.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4991) }}

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×