U.N. Climate Report: Be Afraid Globally, Prepare Locally


Cracked mud dries on the shores of the 'Lac de Joux' lake, in Le Pont, on April 19, 2011. 
National Journal
Ben Geman
March 31, 2014, 3:48 a.m.

Cli­mate change has already be­gun tak­ing a toll on the nat­ur­al world and hu­man so­ci­ety “on all con­tin­ents and across the oceans,” ac­cord­ing to a sweep­ing new re­port from the U.N. cli­mate pan­el that warns of greatly in­creas­ing risks this cen­tury as glob­al emis­sions rise.

Poor and low-ly­ing re­gions are es­pe­cially vul­ner­able, but cli­mate-borne risks ex­tend across the globe in a world that re­mains ill-pre­pared des­pite in­creased ad­apt­a­tion plan­ning, ac­cord­ing to the U.N.’s In­ter­gov­ern­ment­al Pan­el on Cli­mate Change.

The re­port cata­logs changes un­der­way, such as lower crop pro­duc­tion in some re­gions, mar­ine spe­cies shift­ing their range, melt­ing gla­ciers, coastal erosion, and more.

“Im­pacts from re­cent cli­mate-re­lated ex­tremes, such as heat waves, droughts, floods, cyc­lones, and wild­fires, re­veal sig­ni­fic­ant vul­ner­ab­il­ity and ex­pos­ure of some eco­sys­tems and many hu­man sys­tems to cur­rent cli­mate vari­ab­il­ity,” the re­port finds.

The re­port also warns that risks will get much tough­er to man­age as emis­sions rise the plan­et con­tin­ues heat­ing up.

It drew a quick re­sponse from the White House, which is push­ing a second-term cli­mate agenda that’s fo­cused on both new emis­sions rules and ad­apt­a­tion plan­ning.

“The re­port high­lights the wide­spread and sub­stan­tial ob­served im­pacts of cli­mate change, and its grow­ing ad­verse ef­fects on live­li­hoods, eco­sys­tems, eco­nom­ies, and hu­man health. Im­port­antly, it also con­cludes that ef­fect­ive ad­apt­a­tion meas­ures can help build a more re­si­li­ent glob­al so­ci­ety in the near term and bey­ond,” said John Hold­ren, Pres­id­ent Obama’s sci­ence ad­viser.

Mash­able’s An­drew Freed­man has a com­pre­hens­ive look at the re­port here, while The New York Times un­wraps the big re­port on cli­mate ef­fects, ad­apt­a­tion, and vul­ner­ab­il­ity here.

Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry seized on the re­port to pro­mote the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s cli­mate agenda and said, “Deni­al of the sci­ence is mal­prac­tice.”

He’s also try­ing to cre­ate mo­mentum for rocky glob­al cli­mate ne­go­ti­ations that are aimed at craft­ing a sweep­ing in­ter­na­tion­al ac­cord in late 2015.

“We’re com­mit­ted to reach­ing an am­bi­tious agree­ment to re­duce glob­al green­house-gas emis­sions with oth­er coun­tries in the United Na­tions Frame­work Con­ven­tion on Cli­mate Change,” Kerry said in a state­ment Monday.

The goal of glob­al cli­mate ne­go­ti­ations is to help lim­it warm­ing to 2 de­grees Celsi­us above prein­dus­tri­al levels. That may be slip­ping out of reach as emis­sions rise, but the au­thors say that some of the high­er tem­per­at­ure pro­jec­tions will bring daunt­ing prob­lems.

“Glob­al cli­mate-change risks are high to very high with glob­al mean tem­per­at­ure in­crease of 4°C or more above prein­dus­tri­al levels … and in­clude severe and wide­spread im­pacts on unique and threatened sys­tems, sub­stan­tial spe­cies ex­tinc­tion, large risks to glob­al and re­gion­al food se­cur­ity, and the com­bin­a­tion of high tem­per­at­ure and hu­mid­ity com­prom­ising nor­mal hu­man activ­it­ies, in­clud­ing grow­ing food or work­ing out­doors in some areas for parts of the year,” the new re­port warns.

The re­port is chock-full of warn­ings but finds some bright spots, not­ing that gov­ern­ments are be­gin­ning to craft ad­apt­a­tion plans and in­teg­rate cli­mate change in­to de­vel­op­ment plans. But more is needed, au­thors say.

“Cli­mate-change ad­apt­a­tion is not an exot­ic agenda that has nev­er been tried. Gov­ern­ments, firms, and com­munit­ies around the world are build­ing ex­per­i­ence with ad­apt­a­tion,” said Chris Field, a Stan­ford Uni­versity pro­fess­or who helped lead the study. “This ex­per­i­ence forms a start­ing point for bolder, more am­bi­tious ad­apt­a­tions that will be im­port­ant as cli­mate and so­ci­ety con­tin­ue to change.”

The IP­CC study provides ad­voc­ates of emis­sions curbs plenty of am­muni­tion as they seek a mean­ing­ful pact while glob­al emis­sions con­tin­ue to soar.

Cli­mate change can in­dir­ectly boost the risk of vi­ol­ent con­flict by “amp­li­fy­ing well-doc­u­mented drivers of these con­flicts such as poverty and eco­nom­ic shocks,” the IP­CC au­thors state.

Else­where, the study notes that today the ef­fect of cli­mate change on hu­man health is small com­pared with oth­er stressors. But the risks will grow.

“Un­til mid-cen­tury, pro­jec­ted cli­mate change will im­pact hu­man health mainly by ex­acer­bat­ing health prob­lems that already ex­ist,” the re­port states, but adds: “Throughout the 21st cen­tury, cli­mate change is ex­pec­ted to lead to in­creases in ill-health in many re­gions and es­pe­cially in de­vel­op­ing coun­tries with low in­come, as com­pared to a baseline without cli­mate change.”

Mean­while, As­so­ci­ated Press cli­mate cor­res­pond­ent Seth Boren­stein zer­oes in on a shift from the IP­CC’s 2007 fore­cast:

The last time the pan­el re­por­ted on the ef­fects of warm­ing in 2007, it said it was too early to tell wheth­er cli­mate change would in­crease or de­crease food pro­duc­tion, and many skep­tics talked of a green­ing world. But in the past sev­er­al years the sci­entif­ic lit­er­at­ure has been over­whelm­ing in show­ing that cli­mate change hurts food pro­duc­tion, said Chris Field of the Carne­gie In­sti­tu­tion of Sci­ence and lead au­thor of the cli­mate re­port.

The re­port is the second phase of the latest big as­sess­ment of cli­mate change from the IP­CC, which pro­duces a sweep­ing re­view about once every five years.

The first phase was re­leased late last year and found that hu­mans have been the main driver of glob­al warm­ing since the mid-20th cen­tury, while a third up­com­ing phase will look at op­tions for stem­ming cli­mate change.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4696) }}

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
22 hours ago

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.