West Virginia Chemical Crisis: The Latest

None

West Virginia American Water customers line up for water at the Gestamp Plant after waiting hours for a water truck, only to have it empited in about 20 minutes on January 10, 2014 in South Charleston, West Virginia. West Virginia American Water determined Thursday MCHM chemical had 'overwhelmed' the plant's capacity to keep it out of the water from a spill at Freedom Industries in Charleston. An unknown amount of the hazardous chemical contaminated the public water system for potentially 300,000 people in West Virginia.
National Journal
Ben Geman
Jan. 13, 2014, 1:35 a.m.

Three hun­dred thou­sand people in West Vir­gin­ia face a fifth day without drink­ing wa­ter from their taps after the leak of a coal-treat­ment chem­ic­al con­tam­in­ated sup­plies in the Char­le­ston re­gion, Bloomberg re­ports.

But Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin said Sunday there’s a “light at the end of the tun­nel” and things are “trend­ing in the right dir­ec­tion” after tests showed low levels of con­tam­in­a­tion from 4-methyl­cyc­lo­hex­ane meth­an­ol, the news ser­vice re­ports.

The ac­ci­dent has promp­ted bottled-wa­ter dis­tri­bu­tion be­cause res­id­ents can­not use tap wa­ter for drink­ing, bathing, and oth­er needs.

The Char­le­ston Gaz­ette, which has ex­tens­ive cov­er­age of the dis­aster, re­ports that state reg­u­lat­ors have for years ig­nored calls for tough­er over­sight of chem­ic­al fa­cil­it­ies.

The Wall Street Journ­al has a front-page story that says the Free­dom In­dus­tries chem­ic­al-stor­age site that leaked op­er­ated with al­most no state and loc­al mon­it­or­ing.

And the chem­ic­al that spilled in­to the Elk River from the com­pany’s Char­le­ston fa­cil­ity “isn’t closely tracked by fed­er­al pro­grams,” the pa­per re­ports.

The ac­ci­dent is also re­ignit­ing calls for Con­gress to toughen fed­er­al reg­u­la­tion of chem­ic­als and in­dustry test­ing re­quire­ments.

Le­gis­la­tion to strengthen the Tox­ic Sub­stances Con­trol Act has lan­guished for years on Cap­it­ol Hill.

En­vir­on­ment­al De­fense Fund sci­ent­ists, in a week­end blog post, said the spill re­veals the “epic fail­ure” of the law passed in the mid-1970s.

“What is par­tic­u­larly mad­den­ing and out­rageous is that no one — not loc­al or state of­fi­cials, not the com­pany that owns the stor­age tank, not the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment — can say any­thing even close to defin­it­ive about what risk the chem­ic­al poses to people, even in the short term, let alone over time,” EDF’s Richard Den­ison and Jen­nifer Mc­Part­land write.

“And that’s where the fail­ures of TSCA come in­to sharp fo­cus,” their post states.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×