Interest Groups Call on EPA to Write Energy Efficiency Into Upcoming Regs

None

The smoke stacks at American Electric Power's (AEP) Mountaineer coal power plant in New Haven, West Virginia, October 30, 2009. In cooperation with AEP, the French company Alstom unveiled the world's largest carbon capture facility at a coal plant, so called 'clean coal,' which will store around 100,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide a year 2.1 kilometers (7,200 feet) underground. 
National Journal
Clare Foran
Dec. 6, 2013, 9:37 a.m.

En­ergy-con­ser­va­tion in­terest groups are call­ing on the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency to make en­ergy ef­fi­ciency a cent­ral part of its new green­house-gas reg­u­la­tions for ex­ist­ing power plants.

The Al­li­ance to Save En­ergy and the Amer­ic­an Coun­cil for an En­ergy-Ef­fi­cient Eco­nomy jointly sub­mit­ted com­ments to EPA on Thursday high­light­ing the role they be­lieve en­ergy-sav­ing meas­ures can play in up­com­ing reg­u­la­tions to lim­it power-plant car­bon emis­sions.

“The Al­li­ance and ACEEE strongly sup­port the re­cog­ni­tion and en­cour­age­ment of en­ergy ef­fi­ciency as an emis­sions re­duc­tion strategy and a means to help achieve com­pli­ance with air qual­ity reg­u­la­tions,” the com­ments state. The Al­li­ance and ACEEE fur­ther con­tend that en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency meas­ures could serve as a cost-ef­fect­ive way for states to meet the forth­com­ing stand­ards.

The com­ments re­com­mend that the agency in­cor­por­ate a num­ber of pro­vi­sions in­to the reg­u­la­tions, which are due to be re­leased in June 2014 and fi­nal­ized the fol­low­ing year.

Among the pro­vi­sions sug­ges­ted, the or­gan­iz­a­tions say the agency should im­ple­ment end-use en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency meas­ures to achieve com­pli­ance. EPA should also provide guid­ance to states as to what kinds of en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency pro­grams may be used to achieve the emis­sions-re­duc­tion tar­get, the com­ments state. The Al­li­ance and ACEEE are quick to note, however, that EPA should al­low states flex­ib­il­ity in de­term­in­ing which pro­grams and meas­ures should be ap­plied.

The com­ments ar­rive as part of a lar­ger push by vari­ous stake­hold­ers to in­flu­ence the agency’s de­cision-mak­ing pro­cess ahead of the draft reg­u­la­tions re­lease.

At the be­gin­ning of the week, Na­tion­al Journ­al re­por­ted that the Re­gion­al Green­house Gas Ini­ti­at­ive, a co­ali­tion of North­east­ern states, is call­ing on EPA to al­low states with ex­ist­ing power-plant emis­sions caps to use already-ex­ist­ing lim­its as a way of com­ply­ing with the stand­ard.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×