Senators: Spending Bill Would Boost Efforts to Secure Nuclear Material

None

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) speaks on Capitol Hill on June 4. On Tuesday, Feinstein's Senate Appropriations Energy and Water Subcommittee approved a fiscal 2015 spending bill.
National Journal
Douglas P. Guarino
June 17, 2014, 9:41 a.m.

Sen­ate ap­pro­pri­at­ors said Tues­day that their spend­ing bill for fisc­al 2015 in­cludes sev­er­al meas­ures meant to aid ef­forts to shield nuc­le­ar and ra­di­olo­gic­al ma­ter­i­als from ter­ror­ists.

The bill, which the Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations Sub­com­mit­tee on En­ergy and Wa­ter ap­proved un­an­im­ously, in­cludes a pro­vi­sion that would re­quire the U.S. Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion “to es­tab­lish min­im­um se­cur­ity stand­ards for ra­di­olo­gic­al sources at med­ic­al and in­dus­tri­al fa­cil­it­ies,” ac­cord­ing to a sum­mary of the le­gis­la­tion.

The doc­u­ment notes that “re­cent in­vest­ig­a­tions found that these sources are vul­ner­able to theft, and cur­rent reg­u­la­tions are not suf­fi­cient to pro­tect the pub­lic against ra­di­olo­gic­al ter­ror­ism.”

NRC of­fi­cials said in 2012 that they had is­sued new rules meant to ad­dress any short­com­ings, but a seni­or in­vest­ig­at­or at the non­par­tis­an Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice told Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire at the time that the reg­u­la­tions would not do enough.

While full de­tails of the Sen­ate bill are not ex­pec­ted to be avail­able un­til later this week, the le­gis­la­tion re­com­mends $1.9 bil­lion — $24 mil­lion above the fisc­al year 2014 level and $423 mil­lion above the budget re­quest — “for non­pro­lif­er­a­tion activ­it­ies that re­duce the threat of ter­ror­ism.”

The funds, which would go to the En­ergy De­part­ment’s Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion, “will ac­cel­er­ate ef­forts to se­cure and per­man­ently elim­in­ate re­main­ing stock­piles of dan­ger­ous nuc­le­ar and ra­di­olo­gic­al ma­ter­i­als around the world,” ac­cord­ing to the an­nounce­ment.

Part of this fund­ing in­crease would go to­ward con­tro­ver­sial ef­forts to con­vert Cold-War era weapons ma­ter­i­al in­to re­act­or fuel — an ef­fort that has been cri­ti­cized by many non­pro­lif­er­a­tion ad­voc­ates. The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is look­ing to put an un­fin­ished plant ded­ic­ated to the con­ver­sion on “cold standby” while it pur­sues oth­er, pos­sibly cheap­er, ways to dis­pose of the ma­ter­i­al.

Sen­at­or Lind­sey Gra­ham (R-S.C.) said dur­ing Tues­day’s markup ses­sion that the bill would “re­store fund­ing to get out of cold standby.” He said the le­gis­la­tion would “al­low the pro­gram to go for­ward, and we’ll have some time to fig­ure out how to make it cost ef­fect­ive.”

Last week, House ap­pro­pri­at­ors ap­proved a bill that would provide $350 mil­lion to con­tin­ue the MOX pro­gram.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×