Experts Press for New Forensic Methods to Spot Bioweapon Attacks


A laboratory at the Beijing Center of Disease Control, seen last year. A new National Research Council report calls for the development of new, "high-confidence" techniques for distinguishing potential biological strikes from other disease threats.
National Journal
Diane Barnes
June 10, 2014, 8:54 a.m.

A Na­tion­al Re­search Coun­cil ex­pert pan­el is ur­ging sci­ent­ists to pur­sue new, re­li­able meth­ods for dis­tin­guish­ing bio­lo­gic­al at­tacks from oth­er out­breaks.

“In the event of a sus­pec­ted bio­lo­gic­al at­tack, lead­ers would have ques­tions about the iden­tity and source of the bio­lo­gic­al threat,” says a re­port re­leased on Fri­day by the in­flu­en­tial fed­er­al ad­vis­ory body. “Forensic sci­ence can help an­swer these ques­tions, and it is es­sen­tial that the an­swers be re­li­able.”

Mi­cro­bi­al forensics” is still a young field, though, and any ef­fort to de­vel­op re­li­able ana­lyt­ic­al tech­niques may de­pend on new gene-se­quen­cing tech­no­lo­gies to as­sess vast num­bers of mi­croor­gan­isms in ad­vance, ac­cord­ing to the au­thors.

“Un­til re­cently there have been few sys­tem­at­ic ef­forts to col­lect and de­scribe the mi­crobes liv­ing in soil, sea­wa­ter, fresh­wa­ter lakes and streams, on plants, and even com­mens­ally in the guts or oth­er sur­faces of hu­mans and oth­er an­im­als,” they wrote in the re­port.

The pan­el said that such “baseline” know­ledge may prove cru­cial to de­term­in­ing wheth­er vir­uses or bac­teria in a dis­ease out­break are sig­ni­fic­antly dif­fer­ent from what is nor­mal for their en­vir­on­ment. That in­form­a­tion, in turn, could aid in as­sess­ing “wheth­er the pres­ence of that patho­gen is nat­ur­al or the res­ult of a de­lib­er­ate or in­ad­vert­ent re­lease,” ac­cord­ing to the re­port.

The au­thors warned, though, that col­lect­ing such “meta­ge­n­om­ic” data would re­quire a ma­jor glob­al ef­fort.

“Form­al in­ter­na­tion­al sci­entif­ic col­lab­or­a­tions will need to be cre­ated to en­sure that tech­no­lo­gic­al re­sources are ac­cess­ible to all na­tions, in­clud­ing de­vel­op­ing coun­tries that cur­rently lack such re­sources, and that fund­ing can be lever­aged bet­ter,” the find­ings state. “This is a high-pri­or­ity need for the re­search and fund­ing agen­das both in­side and out­side the United States that re­quires a co­ordin­ated ef­fort on an in­ter­na­tion­al scale.”

The Na­tion­al Re­search Coun­cil ex­pert pan­el pre­pared its find­ings in con­sulta­tion with the Brit­ish Roy­al So­ci­ety, the Croa­tian Academy of Sci­ence and Arts and the In­ter­na­tion­al Uni­on of Mi­cro­bi­o­lo­gic­al So­ci­et­ies.

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
2 days ago

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.