U.S. Regulators Find No Need to Hasten Spent Nuclear Fuel Transfers

None

Global Security Newswire Staff
May 28, 2014, 10:25 a.m.

U.S. reg­u­lat­ors have op­ted against or­der­ing the ex­ped­ited trans­fer of spent atom­ic fuel from above-ground pools to dry casks, the As­so­ci­ated Press re­ports.

The Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion de­cided to abide by an in­tern­al ad­vise­ment to cease ex­plor­ing the idea of re­quir­ing atom­ic en­ergy plants to speed up the re­mov­al of used fuel from stor­age pools to met­al and con­crete con­tain­ers, ac­cord­ing to a Fri­day com­mis­sion memo.

“The com­mis­sion has ap­proved the staff’s re­com­mend­a­tion that this … activ­ity be closed and that no fur­ther gen­er­ic as­sess­ments be pur­sued re­lated to pos­sible reg­u­lat­ory ac­tions to re­quire the ex­ped­ited trans­fer of spent fuel to dry cask stor­age,” states the memo by Rochelle Ba­vol, act­ing com­mis­sion sec­ret­ary.

A num­ber of U.S. law­makers and act­iv­ists have cri­ti­cized the nuc­le­ar en­ergy in­dustry’s long­stand­ing prac­tice of keep­ing large quant­it­ies of highly ra­dio­act­ive atom­ic ma­ter­i­al in lightly pro­tec­ted stor­age pools. Their con­cern is that wa­ter sur­round­ing the used fuel could es­cape its con­tain­er and lead to the dis­pers­al of harm­ful ra­di­ation in­to the en­vir­on­ment in the event of an earth­quake, flood or ter­ror­ist at­tack.

Last year, com­mis­sion staff con­cluded that mov­ing spent fuel to dry cask stor­age would not res­ult in safety im­prove­ments great enough to war­rant the ex­tra fin­an­cial cost that would come with im­ple­ment­ing the meas­ure.

Bill Dean, Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion north­east re­gion­al ad­min­is­trat­or, in an in­ter­view said the reg­u­lat­or had de­term­ined that both dry casks and pools were “ad­equate stor­age pro­cesses for spent fuel, and there is not a sig­ni­fic­ant safety be­ne­fit to re­quir­ing full trans­fer to dry cask stor­age.”

U.S. Sen­at­or Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) was one of five sen­at­ors to write to the com­mis­sion’s head in re­cent weeks to warn against eas­ing safety and se­cur­ity reg­u­la­tions for moth­balled ci­vil­ian re­act­ors.

“We are one nat­ur­al dis­aster, mech­an­ic­al fail­ure or ter­ror­ist at­tack away from a dis­aster,” Sanders said in a Tues­day state­ment. “If the NRC will not change the rules, I will con­tin­ue to work with my col­leagues to change the rules through le­gis­la­tion.”

Cla­ri­fic­a­tion: This art­icle was mod­i­fied after pub­lic­a­tion to cla­ri­fy the po­ten­tial for ra­di­ation leaks.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×