Watchdog: U.S. Struggles to Track Nuclear-Arms Design Records

None

Technicians perform maintenance on W-76 nuclear warhead. The United States has failed to keep an adequate paper trail from the assembly and maintenance of individual bombs in its nuclear arsenal, an Energy Department auditor said in a report issued last week.  
National Journal
Diane Barnes
March 31, 2014, 10:55 a.m.

A U.S. En­ergy De­part­ment in­vest­ig­at­or has lashed nuc­le­ar-arms of­fices for fail­ing to keep a de­tailed pa­per trail of how they build and care for each bomb.

The Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion has not con­sist­ently tracked each of the thou­sands of nuc­le­ar weapons un­der its charge with a com­pre­hens­ive file of “draw­ings, spe­cific­a­tions, en­gin­eer­ing au­thor­iz­a­tions, man­u­fac­tur­ing re­cords” and oth­er doc­u­ments from its as­sembly and main­ten­ance, says a new re­port by the En­ergy De­part­ment’s in­spect­or gen­er­al.

The miss­ing data ex­poses the U.S. nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al to an ar­ray of un­ne­ces­sary costs and risks, Gregory Fried­man said his team had found.

In one case, of­fi­cials in­cor­rectly ap­proved two com­pon­ents to be ad­ded to a vari­ant of the W-76 nuc­le­ar war­head. The er­ror, they said, cost between $20 mil­lion and $25 mil­lion, and held up pre­par­a­tion of new parts by an ex­tra 12 months.

The United States nev­er “treated the main­ten­ance of ori­gin­al nuc­le­ar weapons [re­cords] as a pri­or­ity” dur­ing or after the Cold War, ac­cord­ing to the March 26 as­sess­ment. The aud­it­ors ar­gued, though, that “re­cap­tur­ing the de­part­ment’s ori­gin­al nuc­le­ar weapons data in a con­fig­ur­able format can po­ten­tially save tens of mil­lions of dol­lars.”

The re­port also warns that lax con­trols on the na­tion’s nuc­le­ar-arms re­cords left an open­ing for pos­sible saboteurs to tamper with arms designs.

In a pos­sible vi­ol­a­tion of En­ergy De­part­ment rules, Los Alam­os Na­tion­al Labor­at­ory gran­ted about 30 design per­son­nel ac­cess to sens­it­ive design in­form­a­tion, “re­gard­less of wheth­er they were as­signed to a nuc­le­ar-weapon pro­ject,” aud­it­ors wrote.

Ac­cord­ing to the New Mex­ico fa­cil­ity’s ad­min­is­trat­ors, re­strict­ing the in­form­a­tion fur­ther would not help se­cur­ity, and “they be­lieved that their in­tern­al pro­cesses were more ef­fi­cient.”

En­ergy De­part­ment of­fi­cials agreed with the in­vest­ig­at­ors’ calls for re­cord-keep­ing up­dates.

“Up­grade re­quire­ments con­tin­ue to be iden­ti­fied and an ac­quis­i­tion strategy will be de­term­ined in [fisc­al year] 2015,” the re­port states.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×