USAID Retracts Request for ‘Positive Images’ of Work in Afghanistan

After posting a contract for a flattering photographer Monday, the agency pulled its request.

Soldiers with the United States Army's 3rd Battalion, 41st Infantry Regiment are seen on a joint patrol with the Afghan National Army prepare for a joint patrol with near Command Outpost Siah Choy on March 28, 2013 in Kandahar Province, Zhari District, Afghanistan.
National Journal
Jordain Carney
Feb. 14, 2014, 10:48 a.m.

The U.S. Agency for In­ter­na­tion­al De­vel­op­ment — which has faced ac­cus­a­tions of mis­man­age­ment and waste with its fund­ing in Afgh­anistan — re­cently can­celed a con­tract for “at­tract­ive visu­al im­ages” about its work in the war-torn coun­try.

The re­quest — which the agency pos­ted Monday — has since been taken off USAID’s web­site. But the agency called for “timely, at­tract­ive visu­al im­ages,” not­ing that in Afgh­anistan “neg­at­ive im­ages flood both so­cial and con­ven­tion­al me­dia with little counter,” ac­cord­ing to a cached Web page of the re­quest.

The Spe­cial In­spect­or Gen­er­al for Afgh­anistan Re­con­struc­tion sorts through the more than $100 bil­lion in fund­ing the United States has al­loc­ated to re­con­struc­tion and re­lief ef­forts in the coun­try. Ac­cord­ing to an audit re­leased last month, USAID agreed to give dir­ect as­sist­ance to sev­en Afghan min­is­tries des­pite de­term­in­ing that “it could not rely on the min­is­tries it as­sessed to man­age donor funds without a host of mit­ig­a­tion meas­ures in place.”

Don­ald Sampler Jr., USAID’s as­sist­ant to the ad­min­is­trat­or for the Of­fice of Afgh­anistan and Pakistan Af­fairs, said Monday that while the me­dia provides an ac­cur­ate — but lim­ited — view of USAID’s work in the coun­try, he ex­pects “the re­port­ing will con­tin­ue to be some­what neg­at­ive.”

His com­ments echo the agency’s re­quest for the pho­to­graphy pro­pos­als, which notes that “the over­whelm­ing ma­jor­ity of pic­tures re­cord­ing that ef­fort are neg­at­ive and at least to some ex­tent mis­lead­ing.”

The Web page doesn’t note how much an in­di­vidu­al would be paid for the pho­to­graphs.

A spokes­man for USAID told USA Today that the pho­to­graphs are sup­posed to “help in­form Afghans about the as­sist­ance Amer­ic­an tax­pay­ers are provid­ing,” but ac­know­ledged that “the word­ing of the [re­quest] did not ap­pro­pri­ately ar­tic­u­late that pur­pose and is be­ing ree­valu­ated.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×