Clapper Would Be Shocked If Russia Wasn’t Trying Hard to Coopt Snowden

House Intel Chairman not happy journalists “selling” classified material

A bus drives past a banner supporting Edward Snowden, a former CIA employee who leaked top-secret documents about sweeping U.S. surveillance programs, at Central, Hong Kong's business district, Tuesday, June 18, 2013. Snowden, the National Security Agency leaker, is defending his disclosure of top-secret U.S. spying programs in an online chat Monday with Britain's Guardian newspaper and attacked U.S. officials for calling him a traitor.
National Journal
Sara Sorcher
Feb. 4, 2014, 7:44 a.m.

Be­ing a former FBI spe­cial agent cer­tainly helps when ques­tion­ing a pan­el of star-stud­ded in­tel­li­gence lead­ers about an is­sue you’re pas­sion­ate about: quelling em­bar­rass­ing na­tion­al se­cur­ity leaks.

House In­tel­li­gence Chair­man Mike Ro­gers went all FBI in a rap­id-fire cross-ex­am­in­a­tion of Dir­ect­or of Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence James Clap­per at a com­mit­tee hear­ing on Tues­day. It mostly went the Michigan Re­pub­lic­an’s way, be­cause the in­tel chief was more than ready to hint — without dir­ectly say­ing — that Rus­sia’s in­tel­li­gence ser­vices were try­ing hard to co-opt former NSA con­tract­or Ed­ward Snowden, who was gran­ted refugee status in that coun­try after his dis­clos­ures about gov­ern­ment spy­ing rocked the in­tel­li­gence world and raised wide­spread pri­vacy con­cerns in the U.S.

The Rus­si­ans are not only cap­able of in­vest­ig­at­ing Snowden, the U.S. in­tel­li­gence ser­vices as­sume they did, Clap­per said.

The ex­change is worth read­ing (and watch­ing).

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4706) }}

RO­GERS: Would you ex­pect the Rus­si­an in­tel­li­gence ser­vices to have had con­ver­sa­tions with this in­di­vidu­al already?

CLAP­PER: I would find it in­cred­u­lous if they didn’t.

RO­GERS: Would you ex­pect someone liv­ing in [Rus­sia] — and be­ing taken care of, and in the be­lieved cus­tody of the Rus­si­ans — to be co­oper­at­ing with the Rus­si­ans in or­der to re­main liv­ing there?

CLAP­PER: That is cer­tainly a pos­sib­il­ity.

Ro­gers also ap­peared to be try­ing to get law-en­force­ment of­fi­cials to agree that re­port­ers’ “selling” of ac­cess to clas­si­fied gov­ern­ment in­form­a­tion — pre­sum­ably, through their art­icles sold to news out­lets — was a crime. Me­dia out­lets across the world have pub­lished hun­dreds of art­icles de­tail­ing the agency’s secret pro­grams, in­clud­ing the col­lec­tion of tele­phone and In­ter­net metadata, and mon­it­or­ing of the com­mu­nic­a­tions of for­eign lead­ers.

But wheth­er their stor­ies ac­tu­ally con­sti­tute a crime, FBI Dir­ect­or James Comey said, is not ex­actly black-and-white.

RO­GERS: So, if I’m a news­pa­per re­port­er for, fill-in-the-blank, and I sell stolen ma­ter­i­al, is that a crime?

COMEY: If you’re a news­pa­per re­port­er, and you’re hawk­ing stolen jew­elry, it’s still a crime.

RO­GERS: And if I’m a news­pa­per re­port­er hawk­ing clas­si­fied ma­ter­i­al I’m not leg­ally in pos­ses­sion of, for per­son­al gain and profit, is that not a crime?

COMEY: That’s a harder ques­tion”¦. [It] could have First Amend­ment im­plic­a­tions.

Comey de­clined to dis­cuss spe­cif­ics in this case, be­cause of the pending in­vest­ig­a­tion, which he hin­ted may in­volve any prob­ing po­ten­tial ac­com­plices, journ­al­ists or oth­er­wise, in the massive leaks.

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.