NSA Panel Member Recommends Increased Data Collection

Former CIA chief says controversial “bulk” collection of data should be expanded to include email, and could prevent the next 9/11.

Former Acting CIA Director Michael Morell at the Capitol on November 15, 2012 in Washington, DC. 
National Journal
Michael Hirsh
Dec. 22, 2013, 10:06 a.m.

Mi­chael Mo­rell, the former act­ing dir­ect­or of the CIA and a mem­ber of Pres­id­ent Obama’s task force on sur­veil­lance, said in an in­ter­view on Sunday that a con­tro­ver­sial tele­phone data-col­lec­tion pro­gram con­duc­ted by the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency should be ex­pan­ded to in­clude emails. He also said the pro­gram, far from be­ing un­ne­ces­sary, could pre­vent the next 9/11.

Mo­rell, seek­ing to cor­rect any mis­per­cep­tion that the pres­id­en­tial pan­el had called for a rad­ic­al cur­tail­ment of NSA pro­grams, said he is in fa­vor of re­start­ing a pro­gram the NSA dis­con­tin­ued in 2011 that in­volved the col­lec­tion of “metadata” for In­ter­net com­mu­nic­a­tions. That pro­gram gets only a brief men­tion in a foot­note on page 97 of the task-force re­port, “Liberty and Se­cur­ity in A Chan­ging World.” “I would ar­gue ac­tu­ally that the email data is prob­ably more valu­able than the tele­phony data,” Mo­rell told Na­tion­al Journ­al in a tele­phone in­ter­view. “You can bet that the last thing a smart ter­ror­ist is go­ing to do right now is call someone in the United States.”

Mo­rell also said that while he agreed with the re­port’s con­clu­sion that the tele­phone data pro­gram, con­duc­ted un­der Sec­tion 215 of the USA Pat­ri­ot Act, made “only a mod­est con­tri­bu­tion to the na­tion’s se­cur­ity” so far, it should be con­tin­ued un­der the new safe­guards re­com­men­ded by the pan­el. “I would ar­gue that what ef­fect­ive­ness we have seen to date is totally ir­rel­ev­ant to how ef­fect­ive it might be in the fu­ture,” he said. “This pro­gram, 215, has the abil­ity to stop the next 9/11, and if you ad­ded emails in there it would make it even more ef­fect­ive. Had it been in place in 2000 and 2001, I think that prob­ably 9/11 would not have happened.”

The pres­id­en­tial pan­el’s 304-page re­port touched off a fresh back­lash against NSA sur­veil­lance pro­grams, com­ing only days after U.S. Dis­trict Judge Richard Le­on ruled that the agency’s reg­u­lar col­lec­tion of most Amer­ic­ans’ phone re­cords was prob­ably un­con­sti­tu­tion­al. The pan­el, which con­sisted of Mo­rell; former coun­terter­ror­ism ad­viser Richard A. Clarke; Uni­versity of Chica­go law pro­fess­or Geof­frey Stone; Peter Swire, an ex­pert in pri­vacy law at the Geor­gia In­sti­tute of Tech­no­logy; and former Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion reg­u­la­tion czar Cass Sun­stein, con­cluded that the Sec­tion 215 pro­gram needed to be sub­stan­tially reined in. It said the tele­phone metadata col­lec­tion — in­volving the track­ing of num­bers of calls and where, when and to whom they’re made, without ex­amin­ing con­tent — should be taken out of the hands of the gov­ern­ment and left to the ser­vice pro­viders, or to a private “third party,” and sub­jec­ted to in­di­vidu­al court or­ders.

“Al­though this pro­cess might be less ef­fi­cient for the gov­ern­ment, NSA Dir­ect­or Gen­er­al Keith Al­ex­an­der in­formed the Re­view Group that NSA it­self has ser­i­ously con­sidered mov­ing to a mod­el in which the data are held by the private sec­tor,” the re­port said.

But Mo­rell em­phas­ized in a sep­ar­ate ap­pear­ance on CBS’s Face the Na­tion on Sunday that these pro­ced­ures would slow down ne­ces­sary data col­lec­tion by only a few days, and that the pan­el has called for an emer­gency ex­cep­tion that would al­low the NSA to oc­ca­sion­ally by­pass a For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court judge.

The task-force re­port also de­livered an en­thu­si­ast­ic en­dorse­ment of an­oth­er email col­lec­tion pro­gram un­der Sec­tion 702 of the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Act, which al­lows the mon­it­or­ing of sus­pi­cious emails abroad. After the pan­el re­viewed 54 coun­terter­ror­ism in­vest­ig­a­tions since 2007 “that res­ul­ted in the pre­ven­tion of ter­ror­ist at­tacks in di­verse na­tions and the United States,” it con­cluded that “in all but one of these cases, in­form­a­tion ob­tained un­der Sec­tion 702 con­trib­uted in some de­gree to the suc­cess of the in­vest­ig­a­tion.”

The dis­con­tin­ued pro­gram for col­lect­ing metadata on In­ter­net com­mu­nic­a­tions that Mo­rell was re­fer­ring to was ori­gin­ally sus­pen­ded for “com­pli­ance” is­sues in 2009, the re­port notes, after “it came to light that NSA had in­ad­vert­ently been col­lect­ing cer­tain types of in­form­a­tion that were not con­sist­ent with the FISC’s au­thor­iz­a­tion or­ders.” Al­ex­an­der re­star­ted that pro­gram in 2010 but then let it ex­pire at the end of 2011 be­cause “for op­er­a­tion­al and tech­nic­al reas­ons, the pro­gram was in­suf­fi­ciently pro­duct­ive to jus­ti­fy the cost,” the re­port says, adding that “the pos­sib­il­ity of re­vis­ing and re­in­sti­tut­ing such a pro­gram was left open.” The re­port says that if the email metadata pro­gram is star­ted up again, it “should be gov­erned by the same re­com­mend­a­tions we make with re­spect to the sec­tion 215 pro­gram.”

Mo­rell and oth­er in­tel­li­gence ex­perts be­lieve that the new and var­ied threats from ex­trem­ist and Qaida-linked groups from Syr­ia to the un­gov­erned areas of Afgh­anistan jus­ti­fy con­tinu­ing such mass sur­veil­lance pro­grams.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4639) }}

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.