Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Can the Library of Congress Rescue Silent Movies? Can the Library of Congress Rescue Silent Movies?

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation


Can the Library of Congress Rescue Silent Movies?


A splice of the silent film "Little Brother" at the Library of Congress Packard Campus for Audio Visual Conservation in Culpeper, Va.(JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)

The Library of Congress may be able to archive billions of tweets, but when it comes to preserving some of our nation’s earliest motion pictures, much of the battle has already been lost.

Just 14 percent of some 11,000 American silent films exist in an original and complete format; an additional 11 percent survive as foreign versions or in low-quality formats, according to a new study commissioned by the LOC’s National Film Preservation Board. Seventy percent of the works from the American silent-film era—defined as lasting from 1912 to 1929 and including such treasured flicks as The Mark of Zorro (1920) and The Jazz Singer (1927)—are believed to be gone forever.


“The Library of Congress can now authoritatively report that the loss of American silent-era feature films constitutes an alarming and irretrievable loss to our nation’s cultural record,” James Billington, the librarian of Congress, wrote in the study’s foreword. “Even if we could preserve all the silent-era films known to exist today in the U.S. and in foreign film archives—something not yet accomplished—it is certain that we and future generations have already lost 75 percent of the creative record from [that] era.”

The irretrievable loss of movies is something hard to imagine in the age of YouTube and Netflix, when any electronic media produced and shared online leaves a virtually permanent footprint, assuming that the Internet doesn’t go anywhere. But while archivists always knew that poor-quality film stock, fires, and movie-studio neglect have forever deleted a significant portion of the early chapters of our cinematic heritage, the new data reveal the extent of the damage and catalogue the films that can still be rescued.

Many of the silents that are still in usable condition are stuck overseas, because many were sent to foreign countries for exhibitions—and stayed there because the cost of transporting the film rolls back proved too costly, said Steve Leggett, program coordinator for the National Film Preservation Board. “If the studios know Congress is interested, they might come in here with some money and some help to get their titles back from overseas,“ Leggett said. “To do everything would cost hundreds of millions of dollars, but with a much smaller amount of money, you can pick and choose a few titles to save.”


He pointed to a recent repatriation project that the National Film Preservation Foundation, funded by Congress to the tune of $530,000 annually, undertook in New Zealand to salvage films that had been decaying in archives for decades. The work led to the rediscovery of several silent titles, including The White Shadow (1924), which now boasts the earliest surviving Alfred Hitchcock credits.

This article appears in the December 5, 2013 edition of NJ Daily as Can the Library of Congress Rescue Silent Movies?.

comments powered by Disqus