New House Ukraine Package Unveiled

The bill could cause a clash with the Senate over IMF provision.

People hold a huge flag, a combination of a Ukrainian, Crimean and Tatar flags, on Independence Square in Kiev on March 23, 2014.
National Journal
Billy House
March 21, 2014, 11:13 a.m.

Key House law­makers on Fri­day un­veiled le­gis­la­tion to aid Ukraine and pun­ish Rus­sia, but the bill did not in­clude In­ter­na­tion­al Mon­et­ary Fund re­forms con­tained in a Sen­ate pro­pos­al that were op­posed by House lead­ers and many con­ser­vat­ives.

The ex­clu­sion of IMF re­forms, con­tained in a bill ap­proved last week by the Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee, sets up a clash. The Sen­ate bill backs the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s call to shift $63 bil­lion from an IMF crisis ac­count to its gen­er­al fund.

Re­pub­lic­ans who op­pose that shift, in­clud­ing House Speak­er John Boehner, say such a move really has noth­ing to do with the Ukraine crisis. They note that Pres­id­ent Obama and Demo­crats have been push­ing the move for some time, and that the pres­id­ent in­cluded it in his budget pro­pos­al for fisc­al 2015.

There was no men­tion of the IMF flap Fri­day by House For­eign Af­fairs Com­mit­tee Chair­man Ed Royce when he an­nounced the new bill, which his com­mit­tee will con­sider Tues­day.

“The U.S. and our European friends should be bol­ster­ing the sov­er­eignty and in­de­pend­ence of Ukraine. That means aid­ing Ukraine’s fledgling demo­cracy, with its May elec­tions loom­ing, and bol­ster­ing its eco­nomy, in­clud­ing by help­ing break Putin’s en­ergy grip over East­ern Europe,” Royce said in a state­ment.

Royce said the U.S. should act im­me­di­ately to in­crease nat­ur­al-gas ex­ports to Europe, un­der­min­ing Rus­sia’s mono­poly, and also that “strong sanc­tions against those Rus­si­ans re­spons­ible for this ag­gres­sion against Ukraine are crit­ic­al.”

Rank­ing mem­ber Eli­ot En­gel, a New York Demo­crat, de­scribed the bill as one that “sup­ple­ments the Pres­id­ent’s ef­forts to im­pose sanc­tions on those re­spons­ible for vi­ol­at­ing Ukraine’s sov­er­eignty and ter­rit­ori­al in­teg­rity, loot­ing Ukraine’s eco­nomy, and vi­ol­at­ing hu­man rights in Ukraine. It sends a clear mes­sage to Pres­id­ent Putin and his cor­rupt cronies that we will not tol­er­ate Rus­si­an ag­gres­sion.”

The bill, dubbed the Ukraine Sup­port Act, would co­di­fy ex­ist­ing ex­ec­ut­ive or­ders that sanc­tion in­di­vidu­als in­volved in the vi­ol­ence in Ukraine or who un­der­mine the in­de­pend­ence, sov­er­eignty, or ter­rit­ori­al or eco­nom­ic in­teg­rity of Ukraine.

It also au­thor­izes the pres­id­ent to im­pose tar­geted sanc­tions, in­clud­ing as­set freezes and visa bans, on any­one in­volved in Novem­ber 2013 in un­der­min­ing the demo­crat­ic pro­cesses or ser­i­ous hu­man-rights ab­uses in Ukraine — vi­ol­at­ing Ukraine’s ter­rit­ori­al in­teg­rity — or in sig­ni­fic­ant acts of cor­rup­tion, in­clud­ing mis­ap­pro­pri­ation of Ukrain­i­an as­sets. In ad­di­tion, the bill would al­low the ad­min­is­tra­tion to care­fully scru­tin­ize banks, es­pe­cially Rus­si­an banks, to de­term­ine if they are in­volved in the plun­der­ing of Ukraine’s as­sets; money laun­der­ing; ter­ror­ist fin­an­cing; act­ively help­ing to skirt sanc­tions; or help­ing to an­nex Crimea.

In terms of sup­port for Ukraine, the bill would provide for a surge in tar­geted broad­cast­ing by re­quir­ing Ra­dio Free Europe/Ra­dio Liberty and Voice of Amer­ica to in­crease broad­casts in­to east­ern Ukraine (in­clud­ing Crimea) and tar­get eth­nic Rus­si­an com­munit­ies.

It also would en­cour­age the Over­seas Private In­vest­ment Cor­por­a­tion to pri­or­it­ize in­vest­ments in Ukraine; en­hance se­cur­ity co­oper­a­tion among NATO states in Cent­ral and East­ern Europe through mil­it­ary train­ing and ex­er­cises; and as­sist Ukrain­i­an law en­force­ment to im­prove pro­tec­tion of hu­man rights.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4838) }}

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.