Debt-Ceiling Debate Takes Shape

None

WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 04: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) speaks to reporters after attending the weekly Democrat policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol on February 4, 2014 in Washington, DC. Senate Democrats gathered at a luncheon to discuss various issues inlcluding todays Farm Bill vote.
National Journal
Billy House Michael Catalini
Feb. 4, 2014, 3:44 p.m.

The fight over the debt ceil­ing has be­gun in earn­est.

Just hours after House Re­pub­lic­ans emerged from a strategy ses­sion in the re­cesses of the Cap­it­ol, where they dis­cussed con­ces­sions they’d like to see the White House and Sen­ate Demo­crats agree to, Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic lead­ers un­pack­aged their pre­for­mu­lated re­sponses and shot down any such sug­ges­tion.

“Let me be clear: We can­not and will not play games with the full faith and cred­it of our coun­try,” Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id said. “We can’t again have to worry about host­age-takers, if that’s what they want.”

After largely stay­ing on the side­lines in re­cent weeks, House Re­pub­lic­ans have now of­fi­cially joined the de­bate over hik­ing the more-than-$17 tril­lion debt ceil­ing. In re­sponse to Demo­crats’ re­fus­al to ne­go­ti­ate on the na­tion’s debt lim­it — a stance that served them well dur­ing the show­down in the fall — GOP House mem­bers are con­sid­er­ing a strategy that would force the Sen­ate in­to a series of un­pop­u­lar votes.

“Look, if this is about ass cov­er­ing — I get it,” said Rep. Jim McGov­ern, D-Mass., a mem­ber of the House Rules Com­mit­tee. “If they want to throw a little red meat out to their con­stitu­ents by for­cing votes on things that won’t pass, that’s fine — as long as they don’t hold things up. It’s when they do that, draw­ing things out, that there are prob­lems.”

The House strategy, which is still evolving, may in­volve for­cing the Sen­ate to vote on a num­ber of Re­pub­lic­an ini­ti­at­ives, but without mak­ing pas­sage of those meas­ures a re­quire­ment for rais­ing the na­tion’s bor­row­ing lim­it.

Un­der the plan, the House would vote sep­ar­ately on two or more meas­ures. One of those would per­mit rais­ing the ceil­ing on the na­tion­al debt. The oth­ers would con­tain items sought by Re­pub­lic­ans, such as ap­prov­al of the Key­stone XL pipeline or re­peal of the so-called risk-cor­ridor pro­vi­sions in the Af­ford­able Care Act, which some call a bail­out for in­sur­ance com­pan­ies.

These mul­tiple res­ol­u­tions would be brought un­der a rule that al­lows the Sen­ate to pass the first meas­ure as a “clean” debt-ceil­ing in­crease, but only after sen­at­ors vote on the oth­er res­ol­u­tions, which could con­tain meas­ures that Re­pub­lic­ans be­lieve would be polit­ic­ally dif­fi­cult for Demo­crats to re­ject.

Re­id did not ad­dress any of the spe­cif­ic meas­ures, oth­er than to dis­miss the no­tion of passing any­thing but a clean ex­ten­sion.

But Demo­crats did seize upon a Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice re­port re­leased Tues­day that said the risk-cor­ridor pro­vi­sions would bring in $8 bil­lion for the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment. Re­peal­ing them, Demo­crats ar­gue, would only in­crease the de­fi­cit.

“It’s a re­mind­er that Re­pub­lic­ans are so des­per­ate to at­tack the Af­ford­able Care Act that they will do or say just about any­thing, in­clud­ing throw­ing their own sup­posed prin­ciples on debt re­duc­tion un­der the bus,” Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Patty Mur­ray said in a state­ment.

The House strategy to tie a debt-ceil­ing res­ol­u­tion un­der one rule with an­oth­er bill was floated last fall. House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor pro­posed a sim­il­ar move as House con­ser­vat­ives were in­sist­ing on de­fund­ing or delay­ing Obama­care in re­turn for a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion to keep gov­ern­ment fun­ded.

That strategy was re­jec­ted by con­ser­vat­ives as not provid­ing enough real lever­age to force Demo­crats to aban­don their res­ist­ance to the GOP’s Obama­care ef­forts. What res­ul­ted was a stan­doff that led to the gov­ern­ment shut­down.

But Re­pub­lic­an of­fi­cials say that same strategy could be well suited to the cur­rent cli­mate, in which Re­pub­lic­ans are clearly not in­ter­ested in a ma­jor show­down. As one House Re­pub­lic­an put it, “There’s been an edu­ca­tion­al curve.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×