A Lesson in Humanity From Bob Dole

The former Republican leader worked with one of the Senate’s most liberal members on hunger issues.

Lasting legacy: Dole takes pride in his work on the ADA.
National Journal
Jerry Hagstrom
Dec. 15, 2013, 7:11 a.m.

Could former Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Bob Dole be a role mod­el in con­vin­cing a new gen­er­a­tion of con­ser­vat­ive House Re­pub­lic­ans to vote for a farm bill that cuts food stamps by only $8 bil­lion over 10 years?

On Wed­nes­day, ru­mors were fly­ing that the bill’s four lead ne­go­ti­at­ors — House Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee Chair­man Frank Lu­cas, R-Okla., and rank­ing mem­ber Col­lin Peterson, D-Minn., and Sen­ate Ag­ri­cul­ture Chair­wo­man Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., and rank­ing mem­ber Thad Co­chran, R-Miss. — had settled on cut­ting the $80 bil­lion-per-year pro­gram by less than $1 bil­lion per year rather than any­thing close to the $39 bil­lion over 10 years that House Re­pub­lic­ans voted for last sum­mer. At the same time, Dole was back on Cap­it­ol Hill to re­ceive an award from World Food Pro­gram USA for his role in al­le­vi­at­ing world hun­ger.

Lu­cas, Peterson, Stabenow, and Co­chran all say they ex­pect the con­fer­ence re­port to be brought up in both cham­bers in Janu­ary, though they have de­clined to dis­cuss any of their agree­ments. But on the side­lines of the Dole event in the Kennedy Caucus Room of the Rus­sell Sen­ate Of­fice Build­ing, Rep Jim McGov­ern, D-Mass., told Na­tion­al Journ­al last week that he ex­pects the cut to be $8 bil­lion. McGov­ern, one of the most vig­or­ous an­ti­hun­ger ad­voc­ates in Con­gress and a con­fer­ee on the bill, be­lieves there should be no cut be­cause food-stamp be­ne­fi­ciar­ies already ex­per­i­enced a cut on Nov. 1 when the boost from the Re­cov­ery Act ex­pired and the long-term un­em­ployed will see their be­ne­fits end on Dec. 28 since Con­gress failed to ex­tend them.

“It will be dif­fi­cult,” McGov­ern said, for mem­bers to go home for the hol­i­days and tell low-in­come or no-in­come people to ex­pect more bad news.

McGov­ern’s op­pos­i­tion to a farm bill that, as he puts it, in­creases hun­ger, raises the like­li­hood that he will vote against the bill and the ques­tion of how many Demo­crats might fol­low him. But the big­ger is­sue is how many of the House Re­pub­lic­an ma­jor­ity will vote for a bill with only a small cut and few of the policy changes that they vig­or­ously ad­voc­ated.

Con­ser­vat­ives wanted to re­duce be­ne­fits and cut as many as 4 mil­lion people off food stamps by elim­in­at­ing the abil­ity of states to ad­just the fed­er­al defin­i­tion of poverty or to ease as­set tests and even al­low states to keep part of the money saved by kick­ing people off the pro­gram. None of those ideas would fly with the Sen­ate, and the con­fer­ence lead­ers ap­pear to have settled on a pro­gram that would in­crease to $20 per year the amount states have to provide people in heat­ing and en­ergy as­sist­ance for those pay­ments to trig­ger high­er food stamp be­ne­fit levels. Pro­grams to try to make sure the states help food-stamp be­ne­fi­ciar­ies find jobs and train­ing will prob­ably also be ad­ded.

Dur­ing the Dole ce­re­mony, Vice Pres­id­ent Joe Biden, who presen­ted the award, and oth­ers made much of the part­ner­ship between the Kan­sas Re­pub­lic­an and the late Sen. George McGov­ern, D-S.D., in passing both do­mest­ic and in­ter­na­tion­al food-as­sist­ance pro­grams.

But Biden, who served in the Sen­ate with both men, noted that McGov­ern and Dole had provided in­di­vidu­al lead­er­ship on hun­ger is­sues be­fore there was a na­tion­al con­sensus on hun­ger but that it was easi­er for McGov­ern as a lib­er­al to deal with the is­sue than for Dole, a con­ser­vat­ive, to deal with his own party.

“Bob, you got the liv­ing hell kicked out of you,” Biden said.

The 90-year-old Dole, phys­ic­ally frail but speak­ing with a strong voice, said there seemed to be more bi­par­tis­an friend­li­ness in Con­gress when he was a mem­ber than there is today, but he also ac­know­ledged that McGov­ern had led him to un­der­stand the hun­ger is­sue.

“I was a skep­tic, but after be­ing with McGov­ern for about three days I un­der­stood we had a real prob­lem in Amer­ica,” Dole said, speak­ing of hear­ings he and McGov­ern had held. He ad­ded that after McGov­ern lost his 1972 pres­id­en­tial cam­paign, the two of them had worked more on in­ter­na­tion­al hun­ger.

“I con­sidered my­self a tra­di­tion­al Amer­ic­an con­ser­vat­ive and he con­sidered him­self a lib­er­al, but we did not talk about polit­ics,” he said. Rather, they would dis­cuss girls in Africa not go­ing to school and boys go­ing to school but get­ting only one meal a day.

But Dole also re­called that he and McGov­ern “knew there were budget­ary lim­its” be­cause the people who testi­fy be­fore con­gres­sion­al com­mit­tees al­ways want more than Con­gress can provide.

These days the im­pres­sion has been cre­ated that Demo­crats do not fa­vor any cuts, but in fact Stabenow and Lu­cas have fol­lowed the McGov­ern-Dole mod­el of re­cog­niz­ing “budget­ary lim­its.”

Rather than go­ing along with an­ti­hun­ger ad­voc­ates who wanted no cuts what­so­ever, Stabenow has said all year that lot­tery win­ners should not get be­ne­fits, that there should be stricter rules on col­lege stu­dents, and that the way the states have sent tiny amounts of money to people un­der the Low In­come Heat­ing and En­ergy As­sist­ance Pro­gram is a “loop­hole.” Peterson has re­peatedly cri­ti­cized the struc­ture of the food-stamps pro­gram, say­ing there should be a whole­sale re­write of the eli­gib­il­ity re­quire­ments to bring them up to date and then scale back the states’ abil­ity to ad­just them.

As the farm-bill vote ap­proaches, House mem­bers might keep both sides of Dole’s world view in mind as they con­sider how to vote on the le­gis­la­tion. Lu­cas, Peterson, Stabenow, and Co­chran do seem to be act­ing in the bi­par­tis­an spir­it of McGov­ern and Dole.

Con­trib­ut­ing Ed­it­or Jerry Hag­strom is the founder and ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of The Hag­strom Re­port, which may be found at www.Hag­strom­Re­port.com.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×