It took Congress three years to pass a bill that deals with the most fundamentally universal aspect of American life: eating.
The Senate gave the final stamp of approval on the five-year farm bill Tuesday, voting 68-32. The 959-page, nearly $1 trillion bill is a massive overhaul of food policy, and covers all sorts of food-related items, such as eliminating direct payments to farmers in lieu of crop insurance and cutting $8 billion in food-stamp funding.
The final bill is a product of on-again, off-again conference-committee negotiations. "It's done!" Senate Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow exclaimed after its final passage. Fellow Democratic Sen. Barbara Mikulski had given her a high-five on the Senate floor during the vote.
But not everyone was pleased with the final product.
Nine Senate Democrats, including Kirsten Gillibrand and Elizabeth Warren, joined 23 Republicans in opposing the bill.
Sen. Robert Casey of Pennsylvania and other Democrats cited cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, aka food stamps, in their decision to oppose the bill.
"There's a lot in the bill that I could certainly support.... Debbie Stabenow deserves a lot of credit for dropping it down from where the House was," Casey said Tuesday. The House version of the bill called for $39 billion in SNAP cuts. "But I just couldn't at this time support a cut of that dimension."
Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders also worried about the food-stamp cuts but said he voted for the bill after receiving assurances from Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin that the state will be able "to protect lower-income Vermonters from these cuts" through state funding. At the same time, Sanders said, he could not ignore the needs of Vermont's well-known dairy industry.
Passing farm bills has historically been an easy and bipartisan effort, but progress on pushing this legislation through had been impeded over disagreements on food-stamp, dairy, and sugar programs, as well as crop insurance and other aspects of agricultural policy. The previous farm bill had been temporarily extended during last year's fiscal-cliff deal, but expired at the end of September.
Such swift approval in Congress this time around belies how tough of a go it's been to reach passage. The farm bill unexpectedly failed in the House last summer when conservatives voted against it because cuts to the food-stamp program didn't go deep enough, while a bloc of liberals voted no because the cuts went too far. This time around, the momentum was there for passage, bolstered by the prospect of another "dairy cliff" and a spike in milk prices, as well as by the support of a broad range of interest groups.
As with so many aspects of legislating, it's not pretty to watch how the sausage is made (or in this case, how the corn is grown). Things were so rough that House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas had said that if he died during the final run-up to the bill, "I want a glass of milk carved on my tombstone—because it's what killed me."
Sarah Mimms contributed to this article.
This article appears in the February 5, 2014 edition of NJ Daily.
DON'T MISS TODAY'S TOP STORIES
Chock full of usable information on today's issues."
Michael, Executive Director
Concise coverage of everything I wish I had hours to read about."
Chuck, Graduate Student
The day's action in one quick read."
Stacy , Director of Communications
Great way to keep up with Washington"
Ray, Professor of Economics