Rep. Stutzman Invokes Sept. 11 Attacks in Pitch for House Whip Job

In his bid to set himself apart from the field, Stutzman’s 9/11 reference strikes an odd note.

Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
June 16, 2014, 11:50 a.m.

Rep. Marlin Stutz­man has taken an in­ter­est­ing tac­tic in ur­ging his fel­low House Re­pub­lic­ans to elect him as ma­jor­ity whip: I’m run­ning be­cause of 9/11.

The In­di­ana Re­pub­lic­an, who launched a bid for the whip job late last week, cir­cu­lated a let­ter to his col­leagues Monday, pitch­ing for votes against Rep. Steve Scal­ise of Louisi­ana and cur­rent Deputy Whip Peter Roskam of Illinois.

Scal­ise, who chairs the con­ser­vat­ive Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee, of which Stutz­man is a mem­ber, has the lead head­ing in­to Thursday’s likely con­test if early whip counts can be trus­ted. (And, giv­en that the elec­tion will be con­duc­ted via secret bal­lot when earli­er prom­ises can be ig­nored without re­per­cus­sion, they prob­ably can’t.) Even so, per­cep­tion mat­ters. And it puts Stutz­man and Roskam in the po­s­i­tion of try­ing to force a second bal­lot and hope to pick up the oth­ers’ sup­port­ers.

Both have writ­ten let­ters to col­leagues lay­ing out their po­s­i­tions in re­cent days to do just that. Stutz­man’s missive high­lights his ped­i­gree as an as­sist­ant whip in his state Le­gis­lature and as ad­viser to a strongly re­spec­ted con­ser­vat­ive voice: then-In­di­ana Gov. Mitch Daniels.

Stutz­man goes on to lay out his plan to run a dif­fer­ent kind of Re­pub­lic­an con­fer­ence, one in which law­makers are giv­en “timely” no­tice of le­gis­la­tion and amend­ments, and giv­ing mem­bers more power to ad­dress loc­al is­sues in their dis­tricts through le­gis­la­tion.

The let­ter, which can be read in full in the Wash­ing­ton Ex­am­iner, is an im­pli­cit shot at House Ma­jor­ity Whip Kev­in Mc­Carthy, who is the front-run­ner in the race for ma­jor­ity lead­er, as well as Roskam.

Stutz­man’s let­ter also high­lights his his­tory as a “fourth-gen­er­a­tion farm­er,” com­par­ing the House Ma­jor­ity con­fer­ence to farm ma­chinery and high­light­ing the im­port­ance of “the minu­tia of the en­gine parts” — lower-tier mem­bers who entered the con­fer­ence dur­ing the tea party wave of 2010, like him­self.

The meta­phor helps to cast Stutz­man — who rep­res­ents North­east­ern In­di­ana — as a vi­able al­tern­at­ive to Scal­ise as a true red-state Re­pub­lic­an. The lan­guage ap­pears to be aimed at ap­peal­ing to mem­bers from con­ser­vat­ive states who feel that they are un­der­rep­res­en­ted in a lead­er­ship roster that rep­res­ents dis­tricts in Cali­for­nia, Ohio, and Wash­ing­ton state. Roskam, mean­while, has tried to gath­er up some of those mem­bers as well by vow­ing in his own let­ter to col­leagues that he will choose a South­ern­er as his own deputy.

The let­ter is clearly tar­geted and rep­res­ents one of Stutz­man’s few op­por­tun­it­ies to present his case to his col­leagues; the House left for the week­end just hours after he an­nounced his can­did­acy and won’t re­turn un­til Tues­day night.

But giv­en the clear cal­cu­la­tion of the let­ter in draw­ing con­trasts between Stutz­man and his op­pon­ents, his clos­ing re­marks are a little puzz­ling. “I’m run­ning be­cause on Septem­ber 11, 2001 I prom­ised my three-week-old son a bet­ter, more se­cure Amer­ica, and I see a way for­ward that will help me keep that prom­ise,” Stutz­man writes.

The lan­guage is strik­ingly sim­il­ar to the Re­pub­lic­an’s bio­graphy on his cam­paign web­site. It reads: “When the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and Shanks­ville, Pennsylvania, be­came the front lines of Amer­ica’s war on ter­ror on Septem­ber 11, 2001, Marlin, as a new fath­er, held his three-week-old son in his arms, watch­ing the hor­rif­ic events un­fold. Like so many Amer­ic­ans struck by the un­cer­tainty and chal­lenges their chil­dren would face, Marlin and his wife Christy soon made the de­cision to be­come more in­volved in their com­munity.”

Clearly the mes­sage worked for voters. Per­haps it will work again.

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.