Congress: Obama Went Behind Our Backs on Bergdahl and There’s Almost Nothing We Can Do About It

Angry as many Republicans and some Democrats are about the violation of the 30-day rule, Congress is acknowledging that they can’t enforce it.

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during an East Room event at the White House June 9, 2014 in Washington, DC. President Obama signed a presidential memorandum on 'reducing the burden of student loan debt.'
National Journal
Sarah Mimms and Elahe Izadi
June 11, 2014, 1 a.m.

To con­gres­sion­al crit­ics, Pres­id­ent Obama ap­pears to have cir­cum­ven­ted fed­er­al law by not in­form­ing Con­gress 30 days in ad­vance of re­leas­ing five Taliban pris­on­ers from Guantanamo Bay. That’s surely a re­cipe for Re­pub­lic­an out­rage, enough to fuel calls for law­suits, im­peach­ment, or new le­gis­la­tion.

But in terms of re­spond­ing to the pres­id­ent’s ac­tions, or pre­vent­ing the ad­min­is­tra­tion from act­ing sim­il­arly in the fu­ture, there isn’t much Con­gress can do. And Re­pub­lic­ans know it.

“I guess we have to go through the at­tor­ney gen­er­al, who does he work for?” Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Jeff Miller quipped Monday as he ex­ited a closed brief­ing on the mat­ter. “It’s un­for­tu­nate. This is a very im­port­ant ques­tion that has to get answered: the con­sti­tu­tion­al­ity of the [Na­tion­al De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act], and I’m very hope­ful that we will pro­ceed through and get it cla­ri­fied and answered be­cause this is a total shift in the way the United States does busi­ness.”

Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Chuck Grass­ley like­wise noted the fu­til­ity of the situ­ation this week. “There’s noth­ing we can do about the fact that he didn’t no­ti­fy us and vi­ol­ate the law. There’s a lot that we can do to get an un­der­stand­ing of how the pres­id­ent ar­rived at that con­clu­sion, like the con­sti­tu­tion­al­ity, the leg­al­ity.”

The spe­cif­ic leg­al is­sue here is a pro­vi­sion in the NDAA that Pres­id­ent Obama signed in­to law in Decem­ber 2013, which stated the ad­min­is­tra­tion must no­ti­fy Con­gress 30 days be­fore re­leas­ing Guantanamo Bay pris­on­ers. At the time, Obama is­sued a sign­ing state­ment call­ing out that spe­cif­ic re­quire­ment, em­phas­iz­ing the flex­ib­il­ity the ex­ec­ut­ive branch has “to act swiftly in con­duct­ing ne­go­ti­ations with for­eign coun­tries re­gard­ing the cir­cum­stances of de­tain­ee trans­fers.”

Even still, Re­pub­lic­ans be­lieve Obama clearly vi­ol­ated the law. 

And the an­swers Con­gress is get­ting so far from the White House aren’t sat­is­fact­ory, many mem­bers say. “At what point are the Amer­ic­an people be­ing dis­respec­ted by the fail­ure to give us in­form­a­tion, be­fore or after [the pris­on­er swap]?” Rep. Brad­ley Byrne, R-Ala., asked after a clas­si­fied brief­ing with ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials on Monday. “I mean they clearly vi­ol­ated the law by not do­ing it be­fore and [they] did not ar­tic­u­late a leg­al reas­on why they had to do that.”

Byrne, who sits on the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, noted that the House would hold hear­ings in­to the mat­ter, but ad­ded that even in the con­text of a hear­ing, mem­bers rarely get the an­swers they’re look­ing for. Asked if there’s any­thing else Con­gress can do about the situ­ation, Byrne said bluntly: “Noth­ing.”

There is one thing that House mem­bers could do: Be­gin the pro­cess of re­mov­ing Obama from the pres­id­ency. But Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Michele Bach­mann of Min­nesota said that while there are many out­side of Wash­ing­ton bring­ing up im­peach­ment, she isn’t call­ing for such an ac­tion.

Why not? It’s an ac­know­ledge­ment of a polit­ic­al real­ity.

“Even if the House would be suc­cess­ful in im­peach­ing the pres­id­ent, the power of re­mov­al lies with the United States Sen­ate and with Harry Re­id lead­ing that cham­ber, I don’t fore­see any scen­ario whereby Harry Re­id would lead an ef­fort to re­move” the pres­id­ent, Bach­mann said. “So there wouldn’t be a fi­nal res­ult if we im­peached.”

Some law­makers are us­ing the in­cid­ent to push bills they say will ad­dress an un­der­ly­ing con­cern. Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Ted Cruz poin­ted to his pro­pos­al to freeze all trans­fers from Guantanamo Bay for six months as one re­sponse. Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., agreed that fur­ther re­stric­tions on trans­fer­ring de­tain­ees could help al­le­vi­ate the prob­lem.

“The top pri­or­ity here is pre­vent­ing the fur­ther re­lease of ter­ror­ists,” Cruz said this week.

But the 30-day rule re­mains an is­sue for many mem­bers, in­clud­ing Demo­crats like Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein of Cali­for­nia and Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va.

Sen. John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz., who has been a vo­cal crit­ic of the Ber­g­dahl swap, said Tues­day he wasn’t aware of any­thing Con­gress could do to en­force the 30-day rule. “I don’t know.”¦ If the pres­id­ent wants to dis­obey the law, then what hap­pens in these things, when they break the trust, then they pay prices in oth­er areas,” he said, but did not elab­or­ate.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×