Democrats Just Threw Down a Deadline For Immigration Reform. Here’s What Happens Next.

Their message: Act by July 31, or President Obama will take strong executive action.

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY), center, with Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV), from left, Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL), and Sen. Patty Murray (D-NV) hold a press conference to urge the House to enact immigration reform at the U.S. Capitol on May 22, 2014 in Washington, DC. Senate democrats called out House Speaker John Boehner for letting nearly a year pass without taking action since the Senate sent over a bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform bill.
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
May 22, 2014, 3:59 p.m.

It’s been al­most a year since the Sen­ate passed com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form.

The Cap­it­ol was packed with ad­voc­ates. Vice Pres­id­ent Joe Biden presided over the vote, and Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id had sen­at­ors cast votes from their desks, a rare move to un­der­score the his­tor­ic nature of the day. Un­doc­u­mented stu­dents filled the Sen­ate gal­lery, and shook their hands in the air — a si­lent ges­ture in place of ap­plause — with each “aye” vote cast.

The kind of op­tim­ism that per­meated that day has all but dis­ap­peared from Cap­it­ol Hill.

Now, Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic lead­ers have set a hard dead­line for the Re­pub­lic­an-con­trolled House to move on com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form: Ju­ly 31, that last day the House is in ses­sion be­fore Au­gust re­cess.

“They have about a six-week win­dow, from June 10 after the last Re­pub­lic­an primary till the Au­gust re­cess,” the Sen­ate’s No. 3 Demo­crat, Chuck Schu­mer, said Thursday at a press con­fer­ence. “If they don’t pass im­mig­ra­tion re­form then, the pres­id­ent will have no choice but to act on his own.”

Re­id gave one of his strongest en­dorse­ments yet of Pres­id­ent Obama tak­ing strong ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion on de­port­a­tion policy this year. Un­der pres­sure from im­mig­ra­tion ad­voc­ates, in­clud­ing the Na­tion­al Coun­cil of La Raza pres­id­ent call­ing him “de­port­er-in-chief,” Obama ordered Home­land Se­cur­ity Sec­ret­ary Jeh John­son in March to re­view the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s ap­proach to de­port­a­tions and re­com­mend pos­sible changes. The res­ult of that re­view could come in June.

“We’re will­ing to wait an­oth­er six weeks, but at the end of six weeks, if something hasn’t been done, then there’s go­ing to have to be a move made,” Re­id said. “And it’s too bad we have to do that, be­cause we all know things can be done ad­min­is­trat­ively, but it’s bet­ter to change the law.”

The concept of a threat of ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion in the face of House GOP in­ac­tion has ac­tu­ally been floated be­fore, by Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Marco Ru­bio. Re­call that Ru­bio was one of the sen­at­ors who craf­ted the Sen­ate im­mig­ra­tion bill, but he’s largely turned away from the is­sue since.

Demo­crats have also called out House Re­pub­lic­ans for say­ing they can’t pass im­mig­ra­tion re­form be­cause they can’t trust Pres­id­ent Obama to en­force the law. “Let’s pass im­mig­ra­tion re­form today, make it take ef­fect at the be­gin­ning of 2017,” Re­id said. “If Re­pub­lic­ans don’t trust Pres­id­ent Obama, let’s give them a chance to im­ple­ment the bill un­der Pres­id­ent Rand Paul or Pres­id­ent Theodore Cruz.”

(Sen. Ted Cruz’s first name is ac­tu­ally Ra­fael, but mov­ing on….) Schu­mer has pre­vi­ously brought up the idea of chan­ging the Sen­ate bill so that it doesn’t take ef­fect un­til Obama is out of of­fice. Now, Re­id has form­al­ized it and pack­aged it as a “com­prom­ise.”

It’s un­clear how ex­actly that would hap­pen. And House Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship im­me­di­ately shot the plan down. “Such a scen­ario would elim­in­ate any in­cent­ive for the ad­min­is­tra­tion to act on bor­der se­cur­ity or en­force the law for the re­mainder of Pres­id­ent Obama’s term,” said Boehner spokes­man Mi­chael Steel.

House Re­pub­lic­ans haven’t ruled out im­ple­ment­ing im­mig­ra­tion re­form this year. “There’s nobody more in­ter­ested in fix­ing this prob­lem than I am,” Boehner said Thursday.

But the grow­ing sense on the Hill is that the win­dow for any sort of im­mig­ra­tion-re­lated bill is rap­idly clos­ing. Just take this mod­est House pro­pos­al to al­low “Dream­ers” to en­list in the mil­it­ary and earn leg­al status. Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor has said he sup­ports it in prin­ciple, but it was blocked from com­ing to the House floor this week on a must-pass de­fense bill. And its pro­spects as a stan­dalone meas­ure later this year are un­cer­tain.

Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Jeff Flake of Ari­zona, who also helped craft last year’s Sen­ate im­mig­ra­tion bill, agreed that if the House doesn’t move by Ju­ly 31, then re­form is “not get­ting done.”

But Flake ac­know­ledged the mis­trust that House Re­pub­lic­ans say is pre­vent­ing them from mo­bil­iz­ing now. “My point has al­ways been, 95 per­cent of this will be en­acted by a fu­ture pres­id­ent any­way if we don’t do any­thing,” he told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “I don’t think it’s a reas­on­able ex­cuse not to move ahead, but there is a lot of mis­trust, and to talk about fur­ther ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion just fur­thers that, so it’s not a good thing.”

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is in­creas­ingly look­ing at ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions to take where Con­gress won’t act. On de­port­a­tions, Obama is walk­ing a thin line. On the one hand, ad­voc­ates have taken the pres­id­ent to task for what they view as his dis­mal re­cord on de­port­a­tions, and His­pan­ic sup­port for the pres­id­ent has been drop­ping. On the oth­er, strong ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion could be in­ter­preted as killing im­mig­ra­tion re­form.

The cal­cu­la­tion rests with House ac­tion this year, and once it be­comes abund­antly clear that there won’t be any, Obama will be in a more flex­ible po­s­i­tion to act.

Re­pub­lic­ans are now try­ing to cri­ti­cize Demo­crat­ic ef­forts on im­mig­ra­tion re­form as politi­ciz­ing an is­sue rather than look­ing for com­prom­ise. A Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee spokes­per­son poin­ted out that Demo­crats failed to act in 2009 and 2010, when they held the House, Sen­ate, and White House.

“Im­mig­ra­tion re­form be­comes im­port­ant to Demo­crats when it is elec­tion time,” said RNC spokes­wo­man Izzy Santa. “Where was Harry Re­id’s daily in­dig­na­tion about the pres­id­ent’s in­ac­tion on fam­ily uni­fic­a­tion when Demo­crats had a su­per­ma­jor­ity?”

But the GOP will have to come to grips with the polit­ic­al rami­fic­a­tions, should their party end up be­ing per­ceived as killing im­mig­ra­tion re­form. That sense of ur­gency hasn’t taken hold just yet, giv­en how so few Re­pub­lic­ans are viewed as vul­ner­able in this year’s elec­tions over the is­sue of im­mig­ra­tion.

“For the midterm elec­tion, I don’t think it makes much dif­fer­ence,” Flake said. “For the pres­id­en­tial elec­tion, I think it’s dev­ast­at­ing for Re­pub­lic­ans. I do think we gotta move.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×