Conservatives on Debt-Limit Plan: What’s In It for Us?

Spending cuts 10 years down the line don’t cut it for the Far Right.

A view of the US Capitol on January 27, 2014 in Washington.
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
Feb. 10, 2014, 2:56 p.m.

House Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship un­veiled a debt-lim­it strategy to mem­ber­ship on Monday night, leav­ing many con­ser­vat­ives won­der­ing what ex­actly is in the bill for Re­pub­lic­ans.

“The bot­tom line is this: This plan in­creases spend­ing and raises the debt ceil­ing. So it makes our fin­an­cial con­di­tion as a coun­try more pre­cari­ous in the years go­ing for­ward,” Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama said of the plan, which would add an ex­tra year of man­dat­ory se­quest­ra­tion cuts in or­der to off­set the cost of elim­in­at­ing re­duc­tions to mil­it­ary pen­sions.

Brooks and oth­ers called the ad­di­tion­al se­quest­ra­tion cuts, which won’t come un­til 2024, a gim­mick, not­ing that little Con­gress might do that far down the line is set in stone. Just look at the ori­gin­al se­quest­ra­tion cuts, which were altered in Decem­ber’s budget agree­ment, only nine months after they first took ef­fect.

“Yeah, a dec­ade from now [we’ll get the off­set], which to me is no off­set at all,” Brooks said. “You have to go through 10 years of Con­gresses be­fore you have a pay-for for an ex­pendit­ure that is im­me­di­ate.”

This is the second time in re­cent months that Con­gress has looked to se­quest­ra­tion to off­set new spend­ing. Once viewed as cuts so ter­ri­fy­ing that no mem­ber of Con­gress would al­low them to take ef­fect, a ma­jor­ity of mem­bers in both parties and both cham­bers passed the budget deal in Decem­ber that ad­ded an­oth­er two years to the man­dat­ory se­quester cuts.

“When you have a pres­id­ent that doesn’t want to go to the man­dat­ory side of spend­ing and we’ve cut be­low what even the Re­pub­lic­ans put out there on the dis­cre­tion­ary side, you’re left with no oth­er op­tions,” Rep. Dev­in Nunes, R-Cal­if., ar­gued.

“Look, nobody likes any of this. But there’s prob­lems with every bill we put up. I just think the lead­er­ship feels this one gives the best chance for us to get Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats to vote for it, get us to 218 votes,” Nunes ad­ded.

Rep. Paul Broun, R-Ga., in­dic­ated that he’ll be a “no” vote but agreed that lead­er­ship is do­ing its best to get mem­bers from both parties to pass a debt-ceil­ing hike. “They’re try­ing their best to find their an­swer,” he said.

House Re­pub­lic­ans were ex­pec­ted to post the bill with the Rules Com­mit­tee Monday even­ing, set­ting up a Wed­nes­day-morn­ing vote and leav­ing little time for ar­gu­ment with­in the caucus. Still, mem­bers over­all ex­pect the bill to pass eas­ily with Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic sup­port. One House Re­pub­lic­an es­tim­ated that as much as 50 per­cent of his caucus would sup­port the meas­ure.

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.