We Now Know Who’s to Blame for Benghazi

A Senate intelligence committee report released Wednesday assigns the blame for the confusion surrounding the 2012 terrorist attacks, but questions remain.

A picture taken on Sept. 10, 2013 shows the main gate of the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on the eve of the anniversary of the 2012 attack.
National Journal
Marina Koren
Jan. 15, 2014, 6:09 a.m.

The en­dur­ing ques­tion of blame sur­round­ing the ter­ror­ist at­tacks in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Amer­ic­ans in 2012 has fi­nally been answered, at least ac­cord­ing to a Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee re­port re­leased Wed­nes­day.

The re­port found that the State De­part­ment failed to in­crease se­cur­ity at the U.S. dip­lo­mat­ic com­pound, des­pite warn­ings of de­teri­or­at­ing safety meas­ures in the area. The re­port also blamed in­tel­li­gence agen­cies, such as the CIA, for not shar­ing in­form­a­tion with the U.S. mil­it­ary com­mand in the area, which it­self lacked the re­sources re­quired to de­fend the con­su­late dur­ing an emer­gency.

These short­falls, which cre­ated a risky en­vir­on­ment at the con­su­late, led the com­mit­tee to de­term­ine that the at­tacks were “likely pre­vent­able.”

“In spite of the de­teri­or­at­ing se­cur­ity situ­ation in Benghazi and ample stra­tegic warn­ings, the United States Gov­ern­ment simply did not do enough to pre­vent these at­tacks and en­sure the safety of those serving in Benghazi,” said Com­mit­tee Vice Chair­man Saxby Cham­b­liss, R-Ga.

Here are the re­port’s key find­ings.

  • Al­though the in­tel­li­gence com­munity has iden­ti­fied sev­er­al people re­spons­ible for the siege in Libya, the ter­ror­ists who car­ried out the at­tack have not been ar­res­ted or charged. The FBI in­vest­ig­a­tion in Libya is on­go­ing, and 15 people who co­oper­ated with agents have since been killed.
  • There were no U.S. mil­it­ary re­sources at the con­su­late to in­ter­vene and help de­fend it im­me­di­ately after it was at­tacked.
  • In the months be­fore the at­tacks, the in­tel­li­gence com­munity re­ceived nu­mer­ous re­ports about the crum­bling se­cur­ity situ­ation near Benghazi, in­dic­at­ing that the Amer­ic­an fa­cil­it­ies there were at risk.
  • Based on those re­ports, the State De­part­ment should have upped se­cur­ity around the con­su­late, es­pe­cially after two at­tacks against West­ern­ers in the area in April and June of 2012.
  • After the at­tacks, in­tel­li­gence re­ports in­ac­cur­ately re­por­ted that a protest con­duc­ted near the con­su­late earli­er that day played a role in the at­tack, but there was not enough in­tel­li­gence or eye­wit­ness re­ports to cor­rob­or­ate that al­leg­a­tion. The in­tel­li­gence com­munity stuck with this as­ser­tion long after the at­tacks, con­fus­ing both poli­cy­makers and the pub­lic.

The re­port of­fers no kind words for the White House and its “lack of co­oper­a­tion.” “Im­port­ant ques­tions re­main un­answered as a dir­ect res­ult of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s fail­ure to provide the Com­mit­tee with ac­cess to ne­ces­sary doc­u­ments and wit­nesses,” it reads.

The FBI, too, has not been forth­com­ing, the com­mit­tee re­ports. “We have also learned that the Fed­er­al Bur­eau of In­vest­ig­a­tion has de­veloped sig­ni­fic­ant in­form­a­tion about the at­tacks and the sus­pec­ted at­tack­ers that is not be­ing shared with Con­gress, even where do­ing so would not in any way im­pact an on­go­ing in­vest­ig­a­tion.”

Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein, D-Cal­if. said in a state­ment that she hopes the re­port “will put to rest many of the con­spir­acy the­or­ies and polit­ic­al ac­cus­a­tions about what happened in Benghazi.” With many ques­tions ap­par­ently still left un­answered, a sig­ni­fic­ant lull in the Benghazi de­bate seems un­likely.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×