Most Americans Want Tougher Food-Stamp Requirements

National Journal poll finds two in three people think the biggest problems with the program are waste, fraud, and abuse.

NEW YORK, NY - SEPTEMBER 18: A woman and her daughter counts out Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) coupons, more commonly known as Food Stamps, while shoping for groceries in the GrowNYC Greenmarket in Union Square on September 18, 2013 in New York City. According to a Gallup poll released earlier this month, 20% of American adults struggled to buy enough food at some point in the last year. The rate of hungry people in America has gone relatively unchanged since 2008, suggesting the economic recovery since the 2008 recession may be disproportionately affecting the wealthy. More than 50 of GrowNYC's Greenmarket's now accept EBT; over $800,000 in sales were complete with EBT payment at the Greenmarket's in 2012. GrowNYC is also currently offering a program known as Health Bucks: for ever $5 spent using EBT at a Greenmarket, GrowNYC provides an additional $2, which can be spent specifically on fresh fruits and vegetables. 
National Journal
Alex Roarty
Dec. 18, 2013, 3:44 p.m.

Driv­en by a strong sense the food-stamp pro­gram is rife with ab­use, two-thirds of Amer­ic­ans say they want to make it harder for people to re­ceive as­sist­ance by re­quir­ing re­cip­i­ents to be drug-free and look­ing for work.

A Na­tion­al Journ­al poll found broad sup­port for tightened eli­gib­il­ity. Even Demo­crats, tra­di­tion­ally res­ist­ant to lim­it­ing ac­cess to so­cial-wel­fare pro­grams, are split: 45 per­cent of them sup­port the change while 49 per­cent do not.

The res­ults sug­gest that the coun­try wel­comes Re­pub­lic­an ef­forts to cut and re­form the Sup­ple­ment­al Nu­tri­tion As­sist­ance Pro­gram, a rar­ity for a party at odds with pub­lic opin­ion on is­sues like gun con­trol, en­ti­tle­ment re­form, and im­mig­ra­tion. Demo­crats’ op­pos­i­tion, mean­while, shows they’re squarely out of step with the pub­lic.

Re­spond­ents were asked how they felt about changes to the food-stamp pro­gram like tight­en­ing eli­gib­il­ity, lim­it­ing how long be­ne­fi­ciar­ies can col­lect, in­creas­ing work re­quire­ments, and ad­min­is­ter­ing drug tests. They were told the Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice es­tim­ated such changes would re­duce its rolls by 4 mil­lion people.

If the pre­dicted re­mov­al of that many people failed to change minds, it’s be­cause the pub­lic thinks many be­ne­fi­ciar­ies don’t de­serve the be­ne­fits they re­cord. Asked what the biggest prob­lem with food stamps was, 66 per­cent of people said there was “too much waste, fraud, and ab­use” — by far the most pop­u­lar of the five op­tions lis­ted.

An­oth­er 12 per­cent said too many people were eli­gible to re­ceive as­sist­ance.

Only 6 per­cent of re­spond­ents said too few were on the pro­gram, while 9 per­cent said the be­ne­fits were too small.

Na­tion­al Journ­al poll show­ing al­most all parties in sup­port of new rules for the na­tion’s food-stamp pro­gram; however, Demo­crats’ views are split down the middle. (Stephanie Stamm)Even 57 per­cent of Demo­crats lis­ted waste as the pro­gram’s biggest li­ab­il­ity. A plur­al­ity — 47 per­cent — of Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans did the same.

Food-stamp us­age has bal­looned since the Great Re­ces­sion, from 32 mil­lion to 47 mil­lion. The pub­lic is re­l­at­ively split on wheth­er this surge is be­cause of loose eli­gib­il­ity re­quire­ments or the slow pace of the eco­nom­ic re­cov­ery — 23 per­cent blame eli­gib­il­ity stand­ards while 34 per­cent say the eco­nomy is the cul­prit. A plur­al­ity, 41 per­cent, say both are to blame.

That’s a 22-point shift from the same sur­vey taken in early June: Then, only 12 per­cent blamed loose eli­gib­il­ity re­quire­ments while 45 per­cent fingered the slow eco­nom­ic re­cov­ery.

The poll was con­duc­ted by land­line and cell-phone in­ter­views with a na­tion­ally rep­res­ent­at­ive sample of 1,000 adults by Prin­ceton Sur­vey Re­search As­so­ci­ates In­ter­na­tion­al from Dec. 12-15. The mar­gin of er­ror is plus or minus 3.6 per­cent­age points.

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.