Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Obama's 'Crisis of Confidence' Obama's 'Crisis of Confidence'

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member or subscriber? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Obama's 'Crisis of Confidence'

When it comes to his signature health care law, the president's margin for error is shrinking.

Sen. Mikulski: 'There's Been a Crisis of Confidence Created'
Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., sounds the alarm on Obamacare at a Senate hearing on Tuesday.

When Sen. Barbara Mikulski speaks, President Obama ought to listen.

 

Attentively.

Mikulski, after all, was a social worker before Obama was 5 and a successful community organizer before he was 10. She led a campaign to stop a proposed 16-lane highway from plowing through her native Highlandtown neighborhood in East Baltimore. She was elected to the City Council in 1971, the U.S. House in 1976, and the Senate in 1986. Mikulski is the dean of the Senate women, and she sports a career voting record of 93.3 with Americans for Democratic Action. She passionately supports Obamacare.

Before questioning Marilyn Tavenner, the head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, at a congressional hearing Tuesday, Mikulski said something that ought to make Obama’s blood run cold.

 

“The launching of the Affordable Care Act has been more than bumpy,” Mikulski said. “I believe there’s been a crisis of confidence created in the dysfunctional nature of the website, the canceling of policies, and sticker shock from some people. We read in The Baltimore Sun this morning that 73,000 Marylanders’ policies will be canceled. So there has been fear, doubt, and a crisis of confidence.”

“Crisis of confidence.” The last time that phrase was memorably uttered was in 1979. It did not turn out well for President Carter.

Mikulski’s worries are profound and cut to the heart of the law’s unsteady implementation.

“What I worry about is that there’s such a crisis of confidence, people won’t enroll. And the very people we need to enroll, particularly our young people, to make this whole system work, won’t happen.”

 

A more devastating assessment of the law’s woes and the long-term consequences of the “fear” and “doubt” surrounding policy cancellations, a still-troubled website, and Obama’s own credibility gap could not have been uttered.

As anyone in politics will tell you, nothing wounds deeper in times of woe than truth told by a friend. It cuts in private. In public, it leaves a bleeding gash.

“The president shares Senator Mikulski’s frustration with the problems that we have seen,” White House press secretary Jay Carney said.

When I asked if Mikulski’s rhetoric was unduly alarmist, Carney said it was not. There you have it: White House confirmation that its signature legislative achievement now suffers from a crisis of confidence.

Time for triage. Not for Healthcare.gov but for the fundamentals of the law Mikulski identified. If young people don’t sign up, the system crashes. Hitting Ctrl+Alt+Delete won’t fix it.

Young and healthy Americans (so-called invincibles) must sign up to create large risk pools and absorb the costs of providing better insurance to the old and sick who were uninsured or who had what Obama considers meager coverage. If they don’t, costs rise because the risk pool is too shallow—not enough healthy enrollees are offsetting the costs of older, sicker consumers. Then premiums rise. That begets more sticker shock. The only phrase Mikulski left out in foreshadowing the end result of a “crisis of confidence” was “death spiral.”

One component of this crisis is Obama’s own credibility. The federal website lacks credibility. The promise that people who liked their plan could keep their plan lacks credibility. Promises of transparency about the website's privacy protections lack credibility. Vows of transparency on enrollment numbers, now apparently to be released next week, lack credibility.

To paraphrase the White House, the crisis of confidence for Obamacare is more than a website.

For the crisis to be lifted, credibility has to be restored. In 2008, I remember Obama telling town-hall audience after town-hall audience the hallmark of his politics would be candor. Said Obama: “What we need from the next president is somebody who will not just tell you what they think you want to hear but will tell you what you need to hear.”

What the public needs to hear is that insurance plans change, and that, in some cases, Americans won’t be able to keep the plan Obama promised they could keep. What the public needs to hear is how few people have enrolled on the federal health care website and what the administration will do to increase enrollment. What the public needs to hear is that website privacy, compromised by the poor initial design, is locked down. What the public needs to hear is something as declarative, direct, and memorable as this.

Obama has to eat those words. It won’t be easy. And the president is off to a bad start.

“In politics, when you have to eat shit, you don’t nibble,” said Democratic strategist Chris Kofinis.

For Kofinis, the colorful metaphor is universal, meaning it applies to all political catastrophes. In this particular case, Kofinis and other Democrats believe Obama would be wise to admit his like-your-plan-keep-your-plan dodge was a mistake and apologize immediately and conspicuously.

Obama took a halting step in that direction Monday, telling a crowd of supporters this: “If you have or had one of these plans before the Affordable Care Act came into law and you really like that plan, what we said was you could keep it if it hasn’t changed since the law was passed.”

That’s nibbling.

A good number of Democrats also think the White House should publish health care plan enrollment numbers (which the House Ways and Means Committee subpoenaed late Tuesday) weekly or even daily just to get the data out there and lift the veil of secrecy. That’s a bad story that’s going to be told anyway, they argue, so tell it now and track the numbers as they rise to try to turn around the narrative. Some Democrats, like Sen. Dianne Feinstein, believe the federal website should be taken down for full repairs and not restarted until it can function fully.

No president wants to admit he misspoke, let alone misled. The administration is terrified of frequently publicizing pitifully small enrollment numbers. And it cannot fathom taking the website offline for weeks of retooling.

Each of these choices tastes like shit.

But they sit at the heart of Mikulski’s “crisis of confidence.”

The time for nibbling has passed.

The author is National Journal correspondent-at-large and chief White House correspondent for CBS News. He is also a distinguished fellow at the George Washington University School of Media and Public Affairs.

Affordable Horror Story

This article appears in the November 6, 2013 edition of NJ Daily as ‘A Crisis of Confidence’.

Comments
comments powered by Disqus
 
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL
 
 
 
 
Make your Election Night headquarters.
See more ▲
 
Hide