Obama and U.S. Catholics: A Complicated Relationship

Pope Francis speaks with President Obama during a private audience on March 27, 2014 at the Vatican.
SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images
George E. Condon Jr.
Add to Briefcase
George E. Condon Jr.
Sept. 13, 2015, 8 p.m.

When Pres­id­ent Obama wel­comes Pope Fran­cis to the White House next week, nobody will be watch­ing more closely than the na­tion’s 79 mil­lion Cath­ol­ics, most of whom ad­mire and re­spect their re­li­gious lead­er but have a much more con­flic­ted view of their polit­ic­al lead­er.

Twice, they voted for Obama, but not by big mar­gins. Sev­er­al times, their in­sti­tu­tions have sued him, but not with great suc­cess. And all this while their bish­ops have al­tern­ated between strong de­nun­ci­ations of parts of his health care law and en­thu­si­ast­ic en­dorse­ments of his im­mig­ra­tion and Ir­an policies. “Obama has largely been per­ceived as someone who has not been a friend of the Cath­ol­ic Church in Amer­ica,” said Chad C. Pecknold, who teaches in the School of Theo­logy and Re­li­gious Stud­ies at The Cath­ol­ic Uni­versity. The re­la­tion­ship, he told Na­tion­al Journ­al, is “com­plic­ated.”

But the pres­id­ent ap­pears to have found an ally in Fran­cis.

Be­hind the scenes, the two lead­ers worked to­geth­er to end the five-dec­ade es­trange­ment between the United States and Cuba. The pres­id­ent has wel­comed the pope’s em­phas­is on fight­ing poverty and his de-em­phas­is of ec­cle­si­ast­ic­al scold­ing on so­cial and sexu­al mat­ters. Obama also cheered Fran­cis’s en­cyc­lic­al de­clar­ing that cli­mate change is mostly man-made. “I think when he meets with the pres­id­ent, I ex­pect there to be a warm per­son­al ex­change and that it will be viewed as an ex­change between per­sons who like each oth­er,” said Pecknold.

That kind of big-pic­ture bon­homie and dip­lo­mat­ic nicety al­most cer­tainly will dom­in­ate the ses­sions Wed­nes­day when Fran­cis be­comes the third pope to vis­it the White House. No one ex­pects the pope to go in­to the de­tails of the many is­sues that have the U.S. Cath­ol­ic bish­ops at odds with the ad­min­is­tra­tion. But nev­er far from any dis­cus­sion between Obama and U.S. Cath­ol­ics is the Health and Hu­man Ser­vices man­date in the Af­ford­able Care Act that re­quires health in­sur­ance plans to provide cov­er­age for con­tra­cept­ives, in­clud­ing some abor­ti­fa­cients such as the “day-after pill.”

The Cath­ol­ic hier­archy felt it was misled by the White House in­to be­liev­ing some ex­emp­tion could be giv­en Cath­ol­ic in­sti­tu­tions, in­clud­ing hos­pit­als, schools, and Cath­ol­ic Char­it­ies. Car­din­al Timothy Dolan of New York, who had been work­ing with the White House, stated that the bish­ops could have been the “biggest cheer­lead­ers” for Obama­care had the ex­emp­tions been gran­ted. In­stead, they are among the biggest crit­ics, of­ten go­ing to court to avoid the man­date.

“We see the Little Sis­ters of the Poor versus the U.S. gov­ern­ment,” said Pecknold. “We see these stor­ies which look like the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has been very heavy-handed with the Church, not in­ter­ested in provid­ing ex­emp­tions it is quite happy to give to busi­nesses but not to the Church. … It has been the agenda of this pres­id­ent to push a total ac­cept­ance of the HHS con­tra­cept­ive man­date on cel­ib­ate nuns. It just doesn’t look good for Obama.”

Today, Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ings pale next to the pope’s. In June, the Pew Re­search Cen­ter broke his ap­prov­al num­bers down by groups. Obama had an ap­prov­al rat­ing of 47 per­cent among white Cath­ol­ics com­pared to 42 per­cent among whites over­all. He also en­joyed a 74 per­cent ap­prov­al from His­pan­ic Cath­ol­ics. In con­trast, Fran­cis is ex­ceed­ingly pop­u­lar in the United States—even after suf­fer­ing a drop in his num­bers when many con­ser­vat­ives pro­tested his cli­mate-change en­cyc­lic­al. A Quin­nipi­ac Poll taken Aug. 20-25 showed that 66 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans have either a fa­vor­able or very fa­vor­able view of the pope. That poll showed 87 per­cent of Cath­ol­ics and 61 per­cent of Prot­est­ants ap­prov­ing.

The fight over the man­date was ra­ging in 2012 even as the pres­id­ent was ap­peal­ing for Cath­ol­ic votes in key states like Ohio, Col­or­ado, Wis­con­sin, and Flor­ida. But for the fifth time in the last six pres­id­en­tial elec­tions, the can­did­ate who won the Cath­ol­ic vote won the elec­tion. (The only ex­cep­tion was 2000 when Al Gore won the Cath­ol­ic vote but lost in the Elect­or­al Col­lege.) On Elec­tion Day 2012, Obama saw a slight drop in his share of the Cath­ol­ic vote from his first elec­tion in 2008. He re­ceived 50 per­cent of the Cath­ol­ic vote, down four points from 2008. Among white Cath­ol­ics, he suffered a sev­en-point drop, get­ting only 40 per­cent of the vote com­pared to 47 per­cent four years earli­er. That was still a bet­ter show­ing than Obama en­joyed from white voters over­all, at only 39 per­cent. From His­pan­ic Cath­ol­ics, the pres­id­ent re­ceived 75 per­cent, up three points from 2008.

Even with those strong num­bers, 2012 is viewed as a po­ten­tial turn­ing point in the re­la­tion­ship between Cath­ol­ics and the Demo­crat­ic Party. Be­fore 2012, there had been a fray­ing of the ties between Cath­ol­ics and the party that most of their par­ents and grand­par­ents auto­mat­ic­ally aligned with. But for some, the party’s con­ven­tion in Char­lotte was par­tic­u­larly un­set­tling, with what seemed to be a nightly parade of sup­port­ers of abor­tion rights, gay mar­riage, and the HHS man­date. Even worse was the em­bar­rass­ing dis­pute when the plat­form writers stripped the phrase “God-giv­en” out of the plat­form, for­cing a pub­lic de­bate on wheth­er to re­store God to the party.

When some on the floor loudly booed the vote on God, it was too much for some Demo­crats. Bish­op Thomas To­bin of the dio­cese of Provid­ence in Rhode Is­land, spoke for them when he an­nounced he was drop­ping his long­time re­gis­tra­tion as a Demo­crat and be­com­ing a Re­pub­lic­an. “I just can’t be as­so­ci­ated struc­tur­ally with that group, in terms of abor­tion and NARAL and Planned Par­ent­hood and the same-sex mar­riage and the cul­tur­al de­struc­tion I saw go­ing on,” he said, adding, “The a-ha mo­ment for me was the 2012 Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Con­ven­tion. … It was just aw­ful.”

Jay W. Richards, who teaches at the School of Busi­ness and Eco­nom­ics at The Cath­ol­ic Uni­versity, said what many re­membered from Char­lotte was “that boo­ing of God.” But, he ad­ded, “It was really over the course of the con­ven­tion you re­mem­ber the ro­bust de­fense of abor­tion rights. I really think it was the cul­min­a­tion of the Af­ford­able Care Act and lack of ac­com­mod­a­tion on these pro­vi­sions on abor­ti­fa­cient drugs. … For the pres­id­ent, surely he could come up with an ex­cep­tion for this. But he dug in his heels and he made it very dif­fi­cult for a prac­ti­cing Cath­ol­ic.”

Luck­ily for Obama and the Demo­crats, many Amer­ic­an Cath­ol­ics do not really prac­tice what the Church preaches on mat­ters of birth con­trol, ho­mo­sexu­al­ity, and abor­tion. For Cath­ol­ics who em­phas­ize acts of char­ity and fight­ing poverty, Obama has dis­tinct ap­peal. And Fran­cis is the pope they have been wait­ing for.

The pres­id­ent re­ferred to this when he ad­dressed the Cath­ol­ic-Evan­gel­ic­al Lead­er­ship Sum­mit on Over­com­ing Poverty at Geor­getown Uni­versity in May. Not­ing that his first job in Chica­go was for a Cath­ol­ic so­cial-justice or­gan­iz­a­tion, with his of­fice in a Cath­ol­ic church, Obama said fight­ing poverty should be cent­ral to any min­istry. “When it comes to … what’s the thing that is really go­ing to cap­ture the es­sence of who we are as Chris­ti­ans or as Cath­ol­ics or what have you, … this is of­ten­times viewed as a ‘nice to have’ re­l­at­ive to an is­sue like abor­tion.”

In­stead, he said re­li­gious lead­ers have to fo­cus on ac­tions in the com­munity. “Nobody has shown that bet­ter than Pope Fran­cis, who I think has been trans­form­at­ive just through the sin­cer­ity and in­sist­ence that he’s had that this is vi­tal to who we are, this is vi­tal to fol­low­ing what Je­sus Christ, our Sa­vior, talked about,” said Obama. That, he said, is why Fran­cis has “such in­cred­ible ap­peal” to young people. “And,” Obama con­cluded, “I hope that is a mes­sage that every­body re­ceives when he comes to vis­it here. I can’t wait to host him be­cause I think it will help to spark an even broad­er con­ver­sa­tion.”

What We're Following See More »
TOOTHLESS?
UN Security Council Condemns N. Korea Launch
34 minutes ago
THE LATEST
HAD SOUGHT INFO ON LOBBYISTS IN ADMINISTRATION
White House Snubs OGE’s Request for Info on Waivers
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Trump administration, in a significant escalation of its clash with the government’s top ethics watchdog, has moved to block an effort to disclose any ethics waivers granted to former lobbyists who now work in the White House or federal agencies." The White House sent a letter to OGE head Walter Shaub, which "challenged his legal authority to demand the information. Dozens of former lobbyists and industry lawyers are working in the Trump administration, which has hired them at a much higher rate than the previous administration. Keeping the waivers confidential would make it impossible to know whether any such officials are violating federal ethics rules or have been given a pass to ignore them."

Source:
NIKKI HALEY HEADING FOR ANKARA
Turkey Summons U.S. Ambassador
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
THOMAS JOINS COURT’S LIBERALS
Court Rules Against NC Voting Districts, Says They Were Racially Motivated
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Supreme Court ruled Monday that racial considerations pervaded the way North Carolina lawmakers drew congressional maps after the 2010 Census in order to maximize Republicans' advantage. The 5-3 ruling, written by Justice Elena Kagan, was the latest in a series of decisions by the justices against the excessive use of race in redistricting, the decennial process of drawing new district lines for Congress and state legislatures. Justice Clarence Thomas joined the court's four liberal justices in striking down the state's maps."

Source:
UNANIMOUS DECISION
SCOTUS Rules Against Venue Shopping in Patent Cases
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Writing for an 8-0 Supreme Court on Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that patent lawsuits "must be brought in the state where the defendant company is incorporated. ... The ruling likely spells an end to the near-monopoly the federal court in the Eastern District of Texas holds in handling patent cases. Plaintiffs for decades have filed suits in that pro-plaintiff district based on a broader interpretation of venue that made suits possible almost anywhere."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login