Threatened Lawsuit Against Obama Viewed With Both Gravitas and Humor

Republican leaders plan to have the House vote in July to sue the president for overreach, but a court case could drag on for years.

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 14: US President Barack Obama (R) walks with Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) after a luncheon at the US Capitol, on March 14, 2014 in Washington, DC. Speaker Boehner hosted a lunch for Prime Minister Enda Kenny of Ireland in honor of St. Patricks Day on Sunday. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
National Journal
George E. Condon Jr.
July 6, 2014, 4:42 p.m.

Even though Speak­er John Boehner has an­nounced his in­ten­tion to have the House sue Pres­id­ent Obama for al­leged non­en­force­ment of laws, don’t ex­pect that suit to come to a court­house near you any­time soon. For now, the threatened lit­ig­a­tion will re­main a handy punch­line for a pres­id­ent scorn­ful of what he sees as a par­tis­an stunt and a heavy prom­ise from a speak­er frus­trated by what he sees as ex­ec­ut­ive over­reach.

In the long run, the suit faces con­sti­tu­tion­al and leg­al hurdles al­most guar­an­teed to drag the pro­cess out for sev­er­al years. These in­clude the his­tor­ic re­luct­ance of the Su­preme Court to ref­er­ee spats between the oth­er two co­equal branches of gov­ern­ment as well as the al­ways-prickly ques­tion of wheth­er Boehner and the Re­pub­lic­ans have stand­ing to file the suit.

Boehner has been ex­plor­ing the pos­sible suit for six months, dis­clos­ing it last month to his caucus. In a memo to his fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans, he ar­gued that the House has stand­ing if the full House au­thor­izes the ac­tion, if “harm is be­ing done to the gen­er­al wel­fare,” and if “there is no le­gis­lat­ive rem­edy.” Those skep­tic­al of the suit have con­ten­ded that the House has le­gis­lat­ive rem­ed­ies with its con­trol of the purse strings and its im­peach­ment power.

Boehner spokes­man Mi­chael Steel said the meas­ure will first go to the Rules Com­mit­tee for either a hear­ing or a markup. “At that point, it will be clear what spe­cif­ic ac­tion or ac­tions the law­suit will tar­get. After that, we’ll have a vote in the full House,” he said. Re­pub­lic­ans hope to have that vote in Ju­ly.

After that, Steel said, the Bi­par­tis­an Leg­al Ad­vis­ory Group (BLAG) “will work with the House coun­sel to file the law­suit it­self.” He stressed that many de­cisions still must be made be­fore any law­suit can be craf­ted.

Des­pite the “bi­par­tis­an” part of BLAG’s name, it is a group ready to do Boehner’s bid­ding. The pan­el, cre­ated in 1993, con­sists of the speak­er, the ma­jor­ity lead­er and ma­jor­ity whip, and the minor­ity lead­er and minor­ity whip—guar­an­tee­ing a 3-2 vote to file the suit.

Steel would not com­mit to a suit be­ing filed be­fore Labor Day. But he vig­or­ously re­futed sug­ges­tions that talk of the suit is a ploy solely de­signed to gin up the GOP base pri­or to the Novem­ber elec­tions. “That’s simply not true,” he said. The speak­er also denied that mo­tiv­a­tion, telling re­port­ers, “No. This is about de­fend­ing the in­sti­tu­tion in which we serve.”

Des­pite these prot­est­a­tions, that is ex­actly how the threatened suit is be­ing treated by the White House. Even if a suit is filed, they be­lieve it could not be de­cided dur­ing Obama’s pres­id­ency. And they see it in purely polit­ic­al terms. To them, it has be­come a punch­line, with Obama draw­ing laughs and cheers when he joked, “So sue me.” In Min­nesota last week, he said he may “in the heat of the mo­ment” have chal­lenged Re­pub­lic­ans to take him to court. But, he ad­ded, “I didn’t think they’d take it lit­er­ally.”

Re­pub­lic­ans are not laugh­ing, though, and are in­creas­ingly ir­rit­ated by the pres­id­ent’s re­sponse. “I just find it pretty troub­ling,” said Steel. “This isn’t something that should be treated flip­pantly.”

What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Preet Bharara Learned at the Foot of Chuck Schumer
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."

Source:
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
×