In 1920, This Campaign Ad Told Women to Vote ‘For Your Own Good’

Oh, how times have changed. Or have they?

National Journal
Marina Koren
April 24, 2014, 9:06 a.m.

Barely three months be­fore the pres­id­en­tial elec­tion in 1920, politi­cians sud­denly had mil­lions of new voters to win over: wo­men.

The race to draw fe­male voters to the polls was on. The Re­pub­lic­an Party, polit­ic­ally dis­sim­il­ar from its mod­ern-day ver­sion, went with a straight­for­ward mes­sage to at­tract wo­men, who had gained the right to vote that Au­gust with the rat­i­fic­a­tion of the 19th Amend­ment.

“Wo­men!” pro­claimed an ad­vert­ise­ment from the Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee in the Novem­ber is­sue of Needle­craft Magazine (whose old is­sues you can buy on eBay). “For Your Own Good Vote the Re­pub­lic­an Tick­et.”

Wo­men may have fi­nally won the abil­ity to elect their rep­res­ent­at­ives, but those rep­res­ent­at­ives were still go­ing to tell them what was good for them. You can view the full ad here.

The ad ap­pealed dir­ectly to moth­ers just slightly re­moved from World War I, say­ing that Demo­crat­ic policy un­der then-Pres­id­ent Woo­drow Wilson would “put rifles in the hands of their sons” and send them to war. Here’s the plea from the Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial tick­et of War­ren G. Hard­ing and Calv­in Coolidge, who would go on to win the elec­tion by a land­slide:

Amer­ic­an wo­men are be­ing asked in this cam­paign to vote for the Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate for Pres­id­ent be­cause he is pledged to the Treaty of Ver­sailles and the Cov­en­ant for a league of na­tions con­tained therein. They are told this cov­en­ant cre­ates the league of peace of which good and great men have dreamed through many cen­tur­ies. They are told it is a cov­en­ant of peace that will end all war.

Four years ago the same party asked for votes for the Demo­crat­ic Pres­id­ent be­cause “he kept us out of war.” He got them and five months later the United States entered the world war.

Is it wise to re­call that, now that we are asked once more to vote for a Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate be­cause he will com­mit us to a cov­en­ant that will keep the world out of war?

The ad sur­pris­ingly — giv­en the gender role ex­pect­a­tions of the time — re­cog­nized wo­men as fin­an­cial pro­viders:

You know how doubly hard it has been for you as man­ager of the fam­ily funds. Yours has been one con­stant struggle try­ing to keep the home and the table sup­plied — try­ing to pay big bills with little dol­lars.

It even prom­ised that the Re­pub­lic­ans would im­prove wo­men’s em­ploy­ment pro­spects, with this quote at­trib­uted to Hard­ing:

I be­lieve in hold­ing fast to every for­ward step in un­shack­ling child labor and el­ev­at­ing con­di­tions of  wo­man’s [sic] em­ploy­ment.

But, un­sur­pris­ingly, wo­men were viewed as moth­ers and wives first, and voters and cit­izens second:

Your in­terest as a wo­man, your in­terest as a moth­er, your in­terest as a cit­izen, your in­terest as the fin­an­cial man­ager of the home, com­bine to re­quire the re­turn to Re­pub­lic­an prin­ciples.”

An es­tim­ated one-third of eli­gible fe­male voters voted that year, com­pared with two-thirds of eli­gible male voters.

Such a con­des­cend­ing call to the bal­lot would re­ceive tre­mend­ous back­lash today (ima­gine the tweets). But nearly a cen­tury later, politi­cians are still tar­get­ing wo­men voters based on tra­di­tion­al roles, such as mar­riage status, as Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Alex Roarty re­cently re­por­ted. The Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee is us­ing a new na­tion­al voter mod­el that will help it identi­fy single wo­men and cre­ate the best mes­sages to reach them. Con­ser­vat­ives, on the oth­er hand, have been blast­ing TV ads aimed at mar­ried wo­men.

And nearly a cen­tury later, some of these at­tempts can go wrong. A re­cent in­fograph­ic ex­plain­ing the White House’s ini­ti­at­ives on equal pay pic­tured two wo­men who wouldn’t look out of place on the set of the 1960s-era show Mad Men: Both wore mod, brightly colored dresses and high heels; one car­ried a hand­bag. “It screams Sex and the City, not 9 to 5,” wrote The Wash­ing­ton Post‘s Nia-Ma­lika Hende­r­son of the pain­fully out­dated de­pic­tion.

Let’s hope it doesn’t take an­oth­er 100 years to get voter out­reach for Amer­ic­an wo­men right.

What We're Following See More »
‘PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE’
Priebus Asks Party to Unite Behind Trump
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
FEELING THE MIDWESTERN BERN
Sanders Upsets Clinton in Indiana
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

Despite trailing Hillary Clinton by a significant margin, Bernie Sanders wasn't going the way of Ted Cruz tonight. The Vermont senator upset Clinton in Indiana, with MSNBC calling the race at 9pm. Sanders appears poised to win by a five- or six-point spread.

Source:
TRUMP IS PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE
Ted Cruz Bows Out, Effectively Ceding the Contest to Trump
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

And just like that, it's over. Ted Cruz will suspend his presidential campaign after losing badly to Donald Trump in Indiana tonight. "While Cruz had always hedged when asked whether he would quit if he lost Indiana; his campaign had laid a huge bet on the state." John Kasich's campaign has pledged to carry on. “From the beginning, I’ve said that I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory,” said Cruz. “Tonight, I’m sorry to say it appears that path has been foreclosed."

Source:
TAKES AT LEAST 45 DELEGATES
Trump Wins Indiana, All but Seals the Nomination
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Republican establishment's last remaining hope—a contested convention this summer—may have just ended in Indiana, as Donald Trump won a decisive victory over Ted Cruz. Nothing Cruz seemed to have in his corner seemed to help—not a presumptive VP pick in Carly Fiorina, not a midwestern state where he's done well in the past, and not the state's legions of conservatives. Though Trump "won't secure the 1,237 delegates he needs to formally claim the nomination until June, his Indiana triumph makes it almost impossible to stop him. Following his decisive wins in New York and other East Coast states, the Indiana victory could put Trump within 200 delegates of the magic number he needs to clinch the nomination." Cruz, meanwhile, "now faces the agonizing choice of whether to remain in the race, with his attempt to force the party into a contested convention in tatters, or to bow out and cede the party nomination to his political nemesis." The Associated Press, which called the race at 7pm, predicts Trump will win at least 45 delegates.

Source:
THE QUESTION
What’s the Average Household Income of a Trump Voter?
12 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Seventy-two thousand dollars, according to FiveThirtyEight. That's higher than the national average, as well as the average Clinton or Sanders voter, but lower than the average Kasich voter.

Source:
×