The Clinton Administration Considered Awarding Carl Sagan the Medal of Freedom

Efforts by officials to boost famous environmentalists and other “good dead” people, though, were unsuccessful.

National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros
March 14, 2014, 9:39 a.m.

Clin­ton ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials con­sidered award­ing famed as­tro­nomer Carl Sagan the Pres­id­en­tial Medal of Free­dom after his death in 1996, new doc­u­ments re­veal.

Sagan, who is fam­ous for at­tempt­ing to pop­ular­ize sci­ence through movies, books, and tele­vi­sion, had just been honored by NASA when the agency dubbed the Mars Rover land­ing spot as the Carl Sagan Me­mori­al Sta­tion. White House staffers then talked about tak­ing it a step fur­ther.

“I won­der if that boosts Carl Sagan pos­tum­ously [sic] for a Medal of Free­dom,” Shelly Fidler, the chief of staff for the White House Coun­cil on En­vir­on­ment­al Qual­ity, wrote in a 1997 email re­leased Fri­day. “You know he was one of the very first to sound the warn­ing on cli­mate as well.”

She then tossed around a few oth­er names for pos­sible medal win­ners: Frank Sher­wood Row­land, who dis­covered the hole in the ozone lay­er, and en­vir­on­ment­al­ist An­sel Adams. But the White House was com­ing across a com­mon prob­lem.

“We’re hav­ing trouble think­ing up great liv­ing people,” Fidler wrote to Todd Stern, an as­sist­ant to the pres­id­ent and staff sec­ret­ary for the Clin­ton ad­min­is­tra­tion. “I guess that’s every­one’s af­flic­tion these days.”

Earli­er in the email, Fidler called Adams “an­oth­er good dead per­son” for the award.

Sagan didn’t end up win­ning the medal, but the idea does show that the Clin­ton ad­min­is­tra­tion was at­tempt­ing to boost the pro­file of cli­mate change and the en­vir­on­ment­al move­ment.

One of Sagan’s bet­ter-known con­tri­bu­tions to space ex­plor­a­tion happened in 1990, when he asked NASA to take what is now one of the most fam­ous pho­tos of Earth. The Voy­ager 1 space­craft was leav­ing the sol­ar sys­tem when NASA com­manded it to turn around and take a photo. From 3.7 bil­lion miles away, you can see a “pale blue dot,” Earth.

“There is per­haps no bet­ter demon­stra­tion of the folly of hu­man con­ceits than this dis­tant im­age of our tiny world,” Sagan wrote in his book Pale Blue Dot. “To me, it un­der­scores our re­spons­ib­il­ity to deal more kindly with one an­oth­er and to pre­serve and cher­ish the pale blue dot, the only home we’ve ever known.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×