Clinton administration officials considered awarding famed astronomer Carl Sagan the Presidential Medal of Freedom after his death in 1996, new documents reveal.
Sagan, who is famous for attempting to popularize science through movies, books, and television, had just been honored by NASA when the agency dubbed the Mars Rover landing spot as the Carl Sagan Memorial Station. White House staffers then talked about taking it a step further.
“I wonder if that boosts Carl Sagan postumously [sic] for a Medal of Freedom,” Shelly Fidler, the chief of staff for the White House Council on Environmental Quality, wrote in a 1997 email released Friday. “You know he was one of the very first to sound the warning on climate as well.”
She then tossed around a few other names for possible medal winners: Frank Sherwood Rowland, who discovered the hole in the ozone layer, and environmentalist Ansel Adams. But the White House was coming across a common problem.
“We’re having trouble thinking up great living people,” Fidler wrote to Todd Stern, an assistant to the president and staff secretary for the Clinton administration. “I guess that’s everyone’s affliction these days.”
Earlier in the email, Fidler called Adams “another good dead person” for the award.
Sagan didn’t end up winning the medal, but the idea does show that the Clinton administration was attempting to boost the profile of climate change and the environmental movement.
One of Sagan’s better-known contributions to space exploration happened in 1990, when he asked NASA to take what is now one of the most famous photos of Earth. The Voyager 1 spacecraft was leaving the solar system when NASA commanded it to turn around and take a photo. From 3.7 billion miles away, you can see a “pale blue dot,” Earth.
“There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world,” Sagan wrote in his book Pale Blue Dot. “To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we’ve ever known.”
What We're Following See More »
"As Donald Trump captures the mantle of presumptive Republican nominee, a new poll finds he begins his general election campaign well behind Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton. The new CNN/ORC Poll, completed ahead of Trump's victory last night, found Clinton leads 54% to 41%, a 13-point edge over the New York businessman, her largest lead since last July. Clinton is also more trusted than Trump on many issues voters rank as critically important, with one big exception. By a 50% to 45% margin, voters say Trump would do a better job handling the economy than Clinton would."
In an editorial, the Wall Street Journal sets out to relieve conservatives of the temptation to back a third-party candidate over Donald Trump. "The thought is more tempting this year than most, but it’s still hard to see how this would accomplish more than electing Hillary Clinton and muddling the message from a Trump defeat. ... The usual presidential result is that the party that splinters hands the election to the other, more united party." But in the Weekly Standard, Bill Kristol is having none of it: "Serious people, including serious conservatives, cannot acquiesce in Donald Trump as their candidate. ... Donald Trump should not be president of the United States. The Wall Street Journal cannot bring itself to say that. We can say it, we do say it, and we are proud to act accordingly."
- Nate Cohn, New York Times: "There have been 10-point shifts over the general election season before, even if it’s uncommon. But there isn’t much of a precedent for huge swings in races with candidates as well known as Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton. A majority of Americans may not like her, but they say they’re scared of him."
- Roger Simon, PJ Media: "He is particularly fortunate that his opposition, Hillary Clinton, besides still being under threat of indictment and still not having defeated Bernie Sanders (go figure), is a truly uninspiring, almost soporific, figure. ... She's not a star. Trump is. All attention will be on him in the general election. The primaries have shown us what an advantage that is. What that means for American politics may not all be good, but it's true."
- The editors, The Washington Examiner: "At the very least, Trump owes it to the country he boasts he will 'make great again' to try to demonstrate some seriousness about the office he seeks. He owes this even to those who will never consider voting for him. He can start by swearing off grand displays of aggressive and apparently deliberate ignorance. This is not too much to ask."
Humana announced it plans to "exit certain statewide individual markets and products 'both on and off [Obamacare] exchange,' the insurer said in its financial results released Monday." The company also said price hikes may be forthcoming, "commensurate with anticipated levels of risk by state." Its individual-market enrollment was down 21% in the first quarter from a year ago.