Rude and bullying, Rep. Darrell Issa silenced the microphone of Rep. Elijah Cummings during a congressional hearing into the IRS’ targeting of tea party groups. “Mr. Chairman,” the Democrat fumed as Republican Issa walked away, “what are you hiding?”
Issa didn’t answer. “He’s taking the Fifth, Elijah,” Democratic Rep. Gerald Connolly joked, a reference to the committee’s reluctant witness, former IRS official Lois Lerner, who refused again to explain the agency’s actions, citing her constitutional right not to self-incriminate. Partisans rejoice!
- Conservatives are applauding Issa for shutting down a Democrat. Without evidence, the Right has convicted Lerner, the IRS, the White House, and President Obama of abuse of power.
- Liberals are applauding Cummings for standing up to Issa. Without evidence, the Left exonerated everybody. The fact that liberal nonprofits also were targeted is relevant, but not conclusive.
To the rest of the country, the “investigations” of the IRS — self-serving inquiries conducted separately by the GOP House and the Obama administration — are partisan jokes. We still don’t know the facts. We still have no reason to trust the Republican Party, the Democratic Party, the IRS, Congress, or the White House.
Rather than a political circus like the one disguising itself as a House Oversight and Government Reform hearing Wednesday, a credible Congress would jointly agree to:
1. Grant immunity to Lerner for her sworn testimony about the IRS’s targeting of political groups. What was done, why, and under whose orders?
2. Demand from the administration every IRS and White House document pertaining to the IRS tea-party probes, including emails, text messages, meeting notes, and diaries. If the White House has legal grounds to duck its promise of transparency, a joint Democratic-GOP demand would create insurmountable political pressure.
3. Embrace the new rule for 501(c)(4) nonprofits. The root of this controversy is a law that says nonprofits needs to “exclusively” focus on social welfare to be tax-exempt. The IRS inexcusably ruled that social welfare must be the groups’ “primary focus,” creating a loophole that both parties have abused. Groups such as Crossroads GPS, created by former George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove, and the liberal-leaning Patriot Majority are blatantly political — to the point that they are replicating, if not replacing, the traditional roles of the Democratic and Republican parties. Now that a chastened IRS is trying to close the loophole, partisans on the right and left are objecting.
4. Stop lying. Both sides are distorting the facts for political gain, but Issa is the worst abuser. As Dana Milbank pointed out in his Washington Post column:
Earlier in his capricious tenure, he banned Democratic witness Sandra Fluke from a panel about birth control, leaving an all-male slate of witnesses and giving his Republican Party a major embarrassment. His hearings have been chaotic affairs in which he talks over members of his panel, and he has often discredited his committee’s investigations by making incendiary accusations that turn out to be unfounded.
His latest: speculating at a fundraiser last month about why Pentagon assets were not mobilized to protect American facilities in Benghazi, Libya, when they were attacked in 2012 because Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton “told them to stand down.” But the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee found that there were no such orders. “Well,” Issa told Fox News’s Chris Wallace when pressed about this on Sunday, “the use in answering questions in a political fundraiser, that was in response to a question, the term ‘stand down’ is not used in some sort of an explicit way.”
On the IRS, similarly, Issa had said that it was “the targeting of the president’s political enemies effectively and lies about it,” and that he would prove it was directed “out of Washington headquarters.” But Issa found no such proof, and on Wednesday he acknowledged that “roads lead to Ms. Lerner.”
Milbank is right: Issa has found no proof, and he should be held accountable for suggesting otherwise. But it’s almost as dishonest for Democrats to claim that there is no proof. We don’t know what a full and fair investigation would yield. We don’t know the truth. It’s been silenced.
What We're Following See More »
"A State Department audit has faulted Hillary Clinton and previous secretaries of state for poorly managing email and other computer information and slowly responding to new cybersecurity risks. ... It cites 'longstanding, systemic weaknesses' related to communications. These started before Clinton's appointment as secretary of state, but her failures were singled out as more serious."
Donald Trump "was on course to win more than three-quarters of the vote in Washington's primary" last night. Ted Cruz's defunct candidacy still pulled about 10 percent. "Cruz dropped out of the race on May 3, but won 40 of the state's 41 delegates up for grabs at last weekend's state GOP convention."
"What started as a calm protest outside Donald Trump’s rally Tuesday erupted into fiery violence as protesters jumped on police cars, smashed windows and fought with Trump supporters and police. Police faced such an angry crowd that they called in reinforcements from around the state, seeking to double their numbers to counter the protesters, whose numbers swelled beyond 600." Protesters threw rocks and bottles at police, who broke up several fights.
Concerned that she's become too divisive, "Democrats on Capitol Hill are discussing whether Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz should step down as Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman before the party’s national convention in July. ... Wasserman Schultz has had an increasingly acrimonious relationship with the party’s other presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, and his supporters, who argue she has tilted the scales in Clinton’s favor." The money quote, from a Democratic senator who backs Clinton: “There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on." Meanwhile, Newsweek takes a look at why no one seems to like Wasserman Schultz.
"The U.S. House of Representatives plans to vote Wednesday on a Republican bill that would block the District of Columbia from spending locally raised tax revenue without congressional approval, prompting President Obama to pledge to veto it. In issuing the veto threat on Tuesday, the Obama White House made one of the strongest statements to date in support of the District’s attempt to win financial independence from Congress."