Democrats are furious with Republicans for refusing to extend unemployment insurance benefits. On Tuesday, they’ll take that fight to the next level — forcing their colleagues to stand face-to-face with some of the long-term unemployed who lost their benefits exactly one month earlier.
A cadre of House Democrats are organizing a sort of sit-in at the State of the Union with about 10 members each bringing an unemployed person from their districts as their plus-one. These guests will sit inside the House chamber, just feet from the Republican members who last month refused to include a short-term extension of the insurance program in the budget agreement.
Democratic Reps. Mark Pocan of Wisconsin and Alan Lowenthal of California organized the movement, urging colleagues to bring one of the long-term unemployed with them to the State of the Union on Tuesday. Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich., who led the fight to extend unemployment benefits during December’s budget debate, has also signed on.
Pocan is bringing Brian Krueger of Mount Horeb, Wisc., with him. Krueger was laid off from his job as a steamfitter in June and has struggled over the last month to make mortgage payments. He and his wife have applied for food stamps and they’ve reduced lunches for their two children, according to Pocan’s office. Krueger has applied for two to three jobs every day, but has still not been able to find work.
More than 1 million Americans, many of whom had already been out of work for 26 weeks, lost their benefits on Dec. 28. That number has since climbed to 1.6 million people and continues to grow as Congress wrangles over the issue.
With both sides attempting to score political points, Congress seems far from reaching a solution. Democrats are pushing for an immediate, if short-term, extension of the program, while Republicans argue that an extension must be paid for. So far, Democrats have been reluctant to find offsets to fund the program, arguing that the expiration of unemployment insurance benefits constitutes an “emergency”.
In reality, the disagreement is an election-year winner for both sides, allowing Democrats to accuse Republicans of not caring for the poor and jobless, while Republicans say their opponents want to expand government without paying for it and continue to drive up the nation’s debt.
The presence of the long-term unemployed could have particular resonance during President Obama’s speech, which is expected to focus on income inequality and economic fairness.
What We're Following See More »
“A bill headed for President Barack Obama this week includes a provision that would ban U.S. imports of fish caught by slaves in Southeast Asia, gold mined by children in Africa and garments sewn by abused women in Bangladesh, closing a loophole in an 85-year-old tariff law.” The Senate approved the bill, which would also ban Internet taxes and overhaul trade laws, by a vote of 75-20. It now goes to President Obama.
Bernie Sanders has closed to within seven points of Hillary Clinton in a new Morning Consult survey. Clinton leads 46%-39%. Consistent with the New Hampshire voting results, Clinton does best with retirees, while Sanders leads by 20 percentage points among those under 30. On the Republican side, Donald Trump is far ahead with 44% support. Trailing by a huge margin are Ted Cruz (17%), Ben Carson (10%) and Marco Rubio (10%).
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.