President Obama Still Has His Base. It Just Isn’t All That Crazy About Him.

The president has sky-high approval among liberal Democrats. But fewer and fewer of them are big fans.

Demonstrators near a McDonald's restaurant outside of the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum as part of a nationwide protest of fast food workers, stand on a poster of US President Barack Obama December 5, 2013 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Matt Berman
Dec. 17, 2013, 5:25 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama hasn’t had the greatest 2013. Ac­cord­ing to a new ABC News/Wash­ing­ton Post poll, the pres­id­ent is end­ing the year with a 43 per­cent ap­prov­al rat­ing, match­ing the low­est point of his pres­id­ency. And his sup­port­ers aren’t nearly as bois­ter­ous as his de­tract­ors. Just 23 per­cent of all re­spond­ents strongly ap­prove of his job per­form­ance, com­pared with the 41 per­cent who strongly dis­ap­prove.

The pres­id­ent still has his fan base. It’s just that, these days, it isn’t too ra­bid.

While the pres­id­ent has a 90 per­cent ap­prov­al rat­ing among self-de­scribed lib­er­al Demo­crats, only 54 per­cent of that group “very strongly” ap­prove of Obama, ac­cord­ing to new data from the Pew Re­search Cen­ter. Thirty-two per­cent of that group ex­pli­citly ap­prove of the pres­id­ent “not so strongly.”

It hasn’t al­ways been this way. This past June, Obama had strong sup­port from 73 per­cent of lib­er­al Demo­crats, and had “not so strong” sup­port from just 17 per­cent. The nose­dive is most pro­nounced among lib­er­als ages 18-49, only 46 per­cent of whom now strongly sup­port the pres­id­ent, com­pared wth 65 per­cent of lib­er­als over 50.

(Pew Re­search)The drop in strong ap­prov­al among lib­er­als — wheth­er be­cause of the NSA scan­dals, the stale­mate on im­mig­ra­tion re­form, the Obama­care rol­lout, or any­thing else — presents a strong con­trast to George W. Bush’s base five years in. Even though Bush’s base was smal­ler, it was far more vehe­ment in its sup­port.

Tues­day’s Wash­ing­ton Post poll is ob­vi­ously bad news for the pres­id­ent, es­pe­cially head­ing in­to an­oth­er round of midterm elec­tions. But the ap­par­ent en­thu­si­asm gap, if it con­tin­ues on its cur­rent trend, could be a har­binger of much big­ger 2014 prob­lems — al­though the out­look is slightly bet­ter be­cause older Amer­ic­ans vote in high­er num­bers in mid­ter­rm elec­tions than do young­er Amer­ic­ans. Demo­crats will have to hope that the pres­id­ent’s on-again, off-again re­la­tion­ship with lib­er­als hits a hot streak next fall.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×