President Obama Still Has His Base. It Just Isn’t All That Crazy About Him.

The president has sky-high approval among liberal Democrats. But fewer and fewer of them are big fans.

Demonstrators near a McDonald's restaurant outside of the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum as part of a nationwide protest of fast food workers, stand on a poster of US President Barack Obama December 5, 2013 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Matt Berman
Dec. 17, 2013, 5:25 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama hasn’t had the greatest 2013. Ac­cord­ing to a new ABC News/Wash­ing­ton Post poll, the pres­id­ent is end­ing the year with a 43 per­cent ap­prov­al rat­ing, match­ing the low­est point of his pres­id­ency. And his sup­port­ers aren’t nearly as bois­ter­ous as his de­tract­ors. Just 23 per­cent of all re­spond­ents strongly ap­prove of his job per­form­ance, com­pared with the 41 per­cent who strongly dis­ap­prove.

The pres­id­ent still has his fan base. It’s just that, these days, it isn’t too ra­bid.

While the pres­id­ent has a 90 per­cent ap­prov­al rat­ing among self-de­scribed lib­er­al Demo­crats, only 54 per­cent of that group “very strongly” ap­prove of Obama, ac­cord­ing to new data from the Pew Re­search Cen­ter. Thirty-two per­cent of that group ex­pli­citly ap­prove of the pres­id­ent “not so strongly.”

It hasn’t al­ways been this way. This past June, Obama had strong sup­port from 73 per­cent of lib­er­al Demo­crats, and had “not so strong” sup­port from just 17 per­cent. The nose­dive is most pro­nounced among lib­er­als ages 18-49, only 46 per­cent of whom now strongly sup­port the pres­id­ent, com­pared wth 65 per­cent of lib­er­als over 50.

(Pew Re­search)The drop in strong ap­prov­al among lib­er­als — wheth­er be­cause of the NSA scan­dals, the stale­mate on im­mig­ra­tion re­form, the Obama­care rol­lout, or any­thing else — presents a strong con­trast to George W. Bush’s base five years in. Even though Bush’s base was smal­ler, it was far more vehe­ment in its sup­port.

Tues­day’s Wash­ing­ton Post poll is ob­vi­ously bad news for the pres­id­ent, es­pe­cially head­ing in­to an­oth­er round of midterm elec­tions. But the ap­par­ent en­thu­si­asm gap, if it con­tin­ues on its cur­rent trend, could be a har­binger of much big­ger 2014 prob­lems — al­though the out­look is slightly bet­ter be­cause older Amer­ic­ans vote in high­er num­bers in mid­ter­rm elec­tions than do young­er Amer­ic­ans. Demo­crats will have to hope that the pres­id­ent’s on-again, off-again re­la­tion­ship with lib­er­als hits a hot streak next fall.

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
2 days ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.