AT&T to FCC: Give the TV Stations What They Want

The cell-phone carrier wants the agency to cave rather than delay an auction of valuable airwaves.

A view of cellular communication towers on March 6, 2014 in Emeryville, California. The U.S. Labor Department is asking mobile phone providers to increase safety training for crews who perform work on cell tower sites in the United States. According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), more tower site workers died in 2013 than in the previous two years combined and four workers have died in the first weeks of 2014.
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Aug. 22, 2014, 3:39 a.m.

TV sta­tions have found an un­likely ally in their leg­al fight with the Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion: AT&T.

The TV broad­casters and cell-phone car­ri­ers are usu­ally at each oth­er’s throats as they each fight for ac­cess to as much of the pub­lic air­waves as pos­sible.

But in a blog post Wed­nes­day, AT&T said the FCC should cave (at least par­tially) to the broad­casters’ latest de­mands rather than risk delay­ing an auc­tion of air­wave li­censes. Joan Marsh, AT&T’s head of reg­u­lat­ory af­fairs, said she be­lieves the broad­casters are “will­ing to con­sider a reas­on­able com­prom­ise.”

“Com­prom­ise must con­tin­ue to be the hall­mark of the in­cent­ive auc­tion pro­ceed­ing,” she wrote, adding that in­dustry groups and the FCC have com­prom­ised on a range of is­sues re­lated to the up­com­ing auc­tion. “And we be­lieve that the is­sues raised by [the Na­tion­al As­so­ci­ation of Broad­casters] can sim­il­arly be re­solved—and re­solved quickly.”

Earli­er this week, the NAB sued over the FCC’s plan to buy back their broad­cast li­censes for auc­tion to the cell-phone in­dustry.

TV sta­tions don’t have to par­ti­cip­ate in the auc­tion, and the air­waves will mean faster smart­phone con­nec­tions for mil­lions of con­sumers. But the broad­casters claimed that the sta­tions that skip the auc­tion could reach few­er view­ers and could be forced to pay mil­lions of dol­lars to re­vamp their equip­ment to work on new chan­nels.

The group wants the FCC to re­work its rules but is not try­ing to stop the auc­tion en­tirely. The broad­casters are ur­ging the FCC to set aside an ad­di­tion­al $500 mil­lion to com­pensate the TV sta­tions for their ex­penses and to use a dif­fer­ent for­mula to en­sure that the sta­tions can reach the same num­ber of view­ers as be­fore the auc­tion.

An FCC spokes­per­son said the agency is “con­fid­ent” the plan com­plies with the law. 

But a pro­longed leg­al battle could force the agency to delay the auc­tion, which is sched­uled for next year. The cell-phone in­dustry has been clam­or­ing for more air­waves as soon as pos­sible, warn­ing that their net­works could soon be­come con­ges­ted due to skyrock­et­ing traffic.

In a note to in­vestors, Paul Gal­lant of Gug­gen­heim Part­ners said the law­suit could delay the auc­tion by six months to a year. That is, of course, un­less the FCC just gives the broad­casters what they want.

A broad­cast in­dustry of­fi­cial said it’s a “good sign” that AT&T has in­dic­ated it wants a com­prom­ise on the is­sue.

“So now the ques­tion is, will the FCC com­prom­ise?” the of­fi­cial said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×